Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-zdfhw Total loading time: 1.147 Render date: 2022-08-10T12:23:13.078Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 22 - Examining Violence Among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity State Hospital Inpatients Across Multiple Time Points: The Roles of Criminogenic Risk Factors and Psychiatric Symptoms

from Part IV - Nonpsychopharmacological Treatment Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2021

Katherine Warburton
University of California, Davis
Stephen M. Stahl
University of California, San Diego
Get access


Institutional violence and associated risk factors within state hospitals have largely remained unexamined in the literature in spite of high violence prevalence rates: almost one-third (31.4%) of state hospital inpatients will engage in a violent assault during their hospitalization course. This dearth of research is particularly true for state hospital inpatients adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). An NGRI status indicates that an individual has been evaluated and deemed guilty of a criminal act but, due to mental disease or defect, was incapable of either knowing or understanding the nature of their act or was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of their crime.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Broderick, C, Azizian, A, Kornbluh, R, Warburton, K. Prevalence of physical violence in a forensic psychiatric hospital system during 2011–2013: patient assaults, staff assaults, and repeatedly violent patients. CNS Spectr. 2015; 20(3): 319330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
§CA Penal Code 1026.Google Scholar
Vitacco, MJ, Balduzzi, E, Rideout, K, Banfe, S, Britton, J. Reconsidering risk assessment with insanity acquittees. Law Hum Behav. 2018; 42(5): 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, F, Moreira, D, Moura, H, Mota, V. Psychiatric monitoring of not guilty by reason of insanity outpatients. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016; 38: 5863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, BE, Edens, JF, Quanbeck, CD, Busse, D, Scott, CL. Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient violence: variable- and person-focused analyses. Law Hum Behav. 2008; 32(4): 325338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grevatt, M, Thomas-Peter, B, Hughes, G. Violence, mental disorder and risk assessment: can structured clinical assessments predict the short-term risk of inpatient violence? J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2004; 15(2): 278292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D, Hart, S, Webster, C. Aggression in Psychiatric Patients: Using the HCR-20 to Assess Risk for Violence in Hospital and in the Community. Port Coquitlam, Canada: Riverview Hospital; 1998.Google Scholar
Douglas, KS, Guy, LS, Hart, SD. Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(5): 679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iozzino, L, Ferrari, C, Large, M, Nielssen, O, De Girolamo, G. Prevalence and risk factors of violence by psychiatric acute inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6): e0128536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flannery, RB, Wyshak, G, Tecce, JJ, Flannery, GJ. Characteristics of American assaultive psychiatric patients: review of published findings, 2000–2012. Psychiatr Q. 2014; 85(3): 319328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenk, AM, Fremouw, WJ. Individual characteristics related to prison violence: a critical review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012; 17(5): 430442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, RD, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, et al. Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012; 36(1): 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeem, JL, Steadman, HJ, Manchak, SM. Applicability of the risk-need-responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatr Serv. 2015; 66(9): 916922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draine, J, Salzer, MS, Culhane, DP, Hadley, TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2002; 53(5): 565573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, DAB. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 5th edn. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company; 2010.Google Scholar
Dack, C, Ross, J, Papadopoulos, C, Stewart, D, Bowers, L. A review and meta-analysis of the patient factors associated with psychiatric inpatient aggression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013; 127(4): 255268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, GD. Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: a meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2003; 27(5): 541558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, KS, Strand, S, Belfrage, H, Fransson, G, Levander, S. Reliability and validity evaluation of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV) in Swedish correctional and forensic psychiatric samples. Assessment. 2005; 12(2): 145161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loza, W. Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): a tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. In: Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2018: 165.Google Scholar
Loza, W, Conley, M, Warren, B. Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2004; 48(1): 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, O, Caudy, MS, MacKenzie, DL. A reanalysis of the Self Appraisal Questionnaire: psychometric properties and predictive validity. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013; 57(4): 445459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loza, W, Neo, LH, Shahinfar, A, Loza-Fanous, A. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2005; 49(5): 547560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, LR, Melisaratos, N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983; 13(3): 595605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derogatis, LR. BSI Brief Symptom Inventory. Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems (NCS); 1993.Google Scholar
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG. Measures of criminal attitudes and associates: user guide. Unpublished instrument and user guide; 1999.Google Scholar
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG, Forth, AE. Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment. 2002; 9(3): 240253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaPray, M, Ross, H. San Diego quick assessment. J Reading. 1969; 12: 305307.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013.Google Scholar
Lussier, P, Verdun-Jones, S, Deslauriers-Varin, N, Nicholls, T, Brink, J. Chronic violent patients in an inpatient psychiatric hospital: prevalence, description, and identification. Crim Justice Behav. 2010; 37(1): 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, C. Violence report: DSH violence 2010–2017. Sacramento, CA: Department of State Hospitals; 2019.Google Scholar
Warburton, K. The new mission of forensic mental health systems: managing violence as a medical syndrome in an environment that balances treatment and safety. CNS Spectr. 2014; 19(5): 368373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, RD, Fisher, WH, Duan, N, Mandracchia, JT, Murray, D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2010; 34(4): 324336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeem JL, Winter E, Kennealy PJ, Louden JE, Tatar I, Joseph R. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38(3):212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørkly S,Hartvig P,HeggenF-A,BrauerH,MogerT.Developmentofa brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: an introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, Belfrage H. HCR-20V3: Assessing Risk for Violence: User Guide. British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University; 2013.Google Scholar
Webster C, Martin M, Brink J, Nicholls T, Desmarais S. Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START; Version 1.1). Coquitlam, Canada: British Columbia Mental Health & Addiction Services; 2009.Google Scholar
Morgan RD, Kroner D, Mills JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness: Changing Lives and Changing Outcomes: Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan RD, Kroner DG, Mills JF, Bauer RL, Serna C. Treating justice involved persons with mental illness: preliminary evaluation of a comprehensive treatment program. Crim Justice Behav. 2014;41 (7):902–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar M, Brown L, Ramler T, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of changing lives and changing outcomes for male and female justice involved persons with mental illness. Crim Justice Behav. 2019: 0093854819879743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeem JL, Schubert C, Odgers C, Mulvey EP, Gardner W, Lidz C. Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-riskGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats