Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy
- The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Prologue
- Acknowledgements
- Extant Plays by Plautus and Terence
- Abbreviations Used for References to Fragments
- Introduction: Roman Comedy
- Part I The World of Roman Comedy
- Part II The Fabric of Roman Comedy
- Part III The Sociology of Roman Comedy
- Part IV The Reception of Roman Comedy
- Bibliography
- Index Rerum
- Index Locorum
- Cambridge Companions to …
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy
- The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Prologue
- Acknowledgements
- Extant Plays by Plautus and Terence
- Abbreviations Used for References to Fragments
- Introduction: Roman Comedy
- Part I The World of Roman Comedy
- Part II The Fabric of Roman Comedy
- Part III The Sociology of Roman Comedy
- Part IV The Reception of Roman Comedy
- Bibliography
- Index Rerum
- Index Locorum
- Cambridge Companions to …
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy , pp. 367 - 406Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ahrens, H.-J. (1970) ‘Arbiter und iudex in den plautinischen Komödien’. Diss. Kiel.
Alexander, J. (1998) ‘Illumination for Cardinal Antoniottio Pallavicini (1442–1507)’ in Brown, M. P. and McKendrick, S. (eds.) Illuminating the Book: Makers and Interpreters: Essays in Honour of Janet Backhouse. London: 191–208.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1962) ‘Le “Piccolo”, Bertolazzi et Brecht (Notes sur un théatre matérialiste)’, Esprit 30.12: 946–65.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. (1979) ‘Plautus’ Trinummus: The Absurdity of Officious Morality’, Traditio 35: 333–45.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. (1993) Scripts and Scenarios: The Performance of Comedy in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (1622) ‘Farce plaisante et récréative, tirée d’un des plus gentils esprits de ce temps’ in Tragédie nouvelle de la perfidie d’Aman, mignon et favori du roi Assuérus. Paris: 28–33.
Apter, E. (2013) Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. New York.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1963) ‘The End of Terence’s Adelphoe. A Postscript’, Greece and Rome 10: 140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1964a) ‘The Confrontation of Sostratos and Gorgias’, Phoenix 18: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1964b) ‘A Note on the Parallels between Menander’s Dyscolos and Plautus’ Aulularia’, Phoenix 18: 232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1970) ‘Phormio parasitus: A Study in Dramatic Methods of Characterisation’, Greece & Rome 17: 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1972) ‘Targets, Techniques and Traditions in Plautus’ Stichus’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 19: 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1985) ‘Terence’s Prologues’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 1–7.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1995) ‘Menander’s Manipulation of Language for the Individualization of Character’ in de Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. H. (eds.) Lo spettacolo delle voci ii. Bari: 147–64.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (2001) ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and Greek Comedy’ in Auhagen, U. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Epidicus. Tübingen: 71–90.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (2003) ‘Diphilus’ ΚΛΗΡΟΥΜΕΝΟΙ and Plautus’ Casina’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates VI: Casina. Urbino: 23–44.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (2007) ‘Surus cor perfrigefacit: Elephants in Plautus’ Pseudolus’, Philologus 151: 177–82.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (2013) ‘Hrotsvit of Gandersheim Christianizes Terence’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustakis, A., and Traill, A. (eds.) (2013) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2004) ‘Das Hetärenfrühstück (Cist. I 1) – Griechisches und Römisches bei Plautus’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 187–210.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2009) Die Hetäre in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, B. (1970) ‘Szenentitel und Szeneneinteilung bei Plautus’. Diss. Tübingen.
Bagordo, A. (2001) Beobachtungen zur Sprache des Terenz: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der umgangssprachlichen Elemente. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, D. (1977) Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bain, D. (1979) ‘Plautus Vortit Barbare: Plautus, Bacchides 526–61 and Menander, Dis exapaton 102–12’ in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.) Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. (1944) William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke (2 vols). Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2002) ‘Palingenre: Death, Rebirth and Horatian Iambos’ in Paschalis, M. (ed.) Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry. Rethymnon: 47–69.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2009) ‘Roman Perspectives on the Greeks’ in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B. and Vasunia, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies. Oxford: 98–113.Google Scholar
Barner, W. (1989) ‘Studia toto amplectenda pectore. Zu Peter Luders Programmrede vom Jahre 1546’ in Buck, A. and Bircher, M. (eds.) Respublica Guelpherbytana. Amsterdam: 227–51.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (1993) ‘Problems of Adaptation in the Eunuchus of Terence’ in Slater, N. W. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart: 160–79.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (2002) ‘Terence and his Greek Models’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 251–77.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (2004a) ‘Actors and Act-divisions in Poenulus and its Greek Original’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus. Tübingen: 93–111.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (2004b) ‘Some Aspects of the Language of Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 335–45.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (2007) ‘Native Roman Rhetoric: Plautus and Terence’ in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.) A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, MA and Oxford: 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomä, A. (2018) ‘Epigenes’ Kampf gegen das Gesetz (Ar. Eccl. 976–1111)’ in Nesselrath, H.-G. and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 1–16.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2005) ‘Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom: An Essay on the Value of Metatheatre’ in Batstone, W. W. and Tissol, G. (eds.) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: 13–46.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2009) ‘The Drama of Rhetoric at Rome’ in Gunderson, E. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge: 212–37.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. (forthcoming) Living Theatre: Roman Theatricalism in the Domestic Sphere. New Haven.
Bean, J. R. (1984) ‘Terence Chastened: Two Character Types from the Plays of Hrotsvitha of Gandersheim’, Michigan Academician 16: 383–90.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2003) ‘The Triumph of the Absurd: Roman Street Theatre’ in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.) Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 21–43.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1930) ‘Plautus and the fabula Atellana’, Classical Review 44: 165–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, W. (2nd edn 1955, 3rd edn 1964) The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic. London.Google Scholar
Beck, E. (1973) ‘Terence Improved: the Paradigm of the Prodigal Son in English Renaissance Comedy’, Renaissance Drama 6: 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, E. I. (1892) ‘Die römischen Komiker als Rechtszeugen’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 13: 53–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, L. (1990) ‘Megaronides Censorius – Eine anticatonische Konzeption im plautinischen Trinummus?’ in Blänsdorf, J. (with André, J.-M. and Frick, N.) (eds.) Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Tübingen: 55–68.Google Scholar
Benz, L. (1995) ‘Die römisch-italische Stegreifspieltradition zur Zeit der Palliata’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 139–54.Google Scholar
Benz, L. (2000) ‘Ein Ausrufermimus im plautinischen Stichus (vv. 218–233)’ in Gödde, S. and Heinze, T. (eds.) Skenika: Beiträge zum antiken Theater und seiner Rezeption. Darmstadt: 165–73.Google Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (1995) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. (1993) ‘Albrecht von Eyb’ in Füssel, S. (ed.) Deutsche Dichter der frühen Neuzeit (1450–1600). Berlin: 96–110.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. (1998) Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Berschin, W. (2005) ‘Tradition und Neubeginn bei Hrotsvit von Gandersheim († nach 968)’ in Berschin, W. (ed.) Mittellateinische Studien. Heidelberg: 237–48.Google Scholar
Bertalot, L. (1915) ‘Humanistische Vorlesungsankündigungen in Deutschland im 15. Jahrhundert’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Erziehung und des Unterrichts N.F. 5: 1–24.Google Scholar
Bertini, F. (1980) Il ‘Teatro’ di Rosvita – con un saggio di traduzione e di interpretazione del Callimaco. Genoa.Google Scholar
Bertini, F. (1985) ‘Simbologia e struttura drammatica nel Gallicanus e nel Pafnutius di Rosvita’ in Braet, H., Nowé, J. and Tournoy, G. (eds.) The Theatre in the Middle Ages. Leuven: 45–59.Google Scholar
Best, S. (2004) The Fugitive’s Properties: Law and the Poetics of Possession. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. (2002) ‘I “Witz” di Gelasimus: clichés, modelli culturali, pragmatica dell’umorismo’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 227–49.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2012) Vertere: un’antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Turin.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. (2014) ‘Plautus and Terence in Performance’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 462–76.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1974) ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’ in Reinhardt, U., Sallmann, K., and Chelius, H. (eds.) Musa Iocosa. Arbeiten über Humor und Witz, Komik und Komödie der Antike. Hildesheim and New York: 141–57.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1996) ‘Un trait original de la comédie de Plaute: le goût de la parodie’, Cahiers du groupe interdisciplinaire du théâtre antique 9: 133–51.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (2003) ‘Atellana fabula’ in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.) The New Pauly: Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. Leiden and Boston: vol. 2, cols. 224–6.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (2011) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Boas, M. (1914) ‘De librorum Catonianorum historia atque compositione’, Mnemosyne 42: 17–46.Google Scholar
Boas, M. (ed.) (1952) Disticha Catonis. Opus post Marci Boas mortem edendum curavit Henricus Johannes Botschuyver. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Booth, K. (1998) ‘National Mother, Global Whore, and Transnational Femocrats: the Politics of AIDS and the Construction of Women at the World Health Organization’, Feminist Studies 24.1: 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughner, D. C. (1954) The Braggart in Renaissance Comedy. A Study in Comparative Drama from Aristophanes to Shakespeare. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Bramante, M. V. (2007) ‘Patres, filii et filiae nelle commedie di Plauto. Note sul diritto nel teatro’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma’. Milan: 95–116.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (2000) ‘Moribus vivitur antiquis – Bemerkungen zur Moral im Trinummus’ in Braun, M., Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F. H. (eds.) Moribus antiquis res stat Romana. Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. Munich and Leipzig: 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenk, F. E. (1987) ‘Heteros tis eimi: on the Language of Menander’s Young Lovers’, Illinois Classical Studies 12: 31–66.Google Scholar
Briguglio, F. (2010) ‘Barthold Georg Niebuhr und die Entdeckung der Gaius-Institutionen – tatsächlich ein “Glückstern”?’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 128: 263–97.Google Scholar
Brophy, R. H. (1974) ‘Mancupium and Mancipatio in Plautus: One Specimen of Plautine Legal Humor and Metaphor’. Diss. Univ. Michigan.
Brown, M. P. (1990, rev. edn 1993) A Guide to Western Historical Scripts from Antiquity to 1600. London and Toronto.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. McC. (1995) ‘Aeschinus at the Door: Terence, Adelphoe 623–43 and the Traditions of Greco-Roman Comedy’ in Brock, R. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8. Leeds: 71–88.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. McC. (2000) ‘Knocking at the Door in Fifth-century Greek Tragedy’ in Gödde, S. and Heinze, T. (eds.) Skenika: Beiträge zum antiken Theater und seiner Rezeption. Darmstadt: 1–16.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. McC. (2005) ‘The Legal and Social Framework of Plautus’ Cistellaria’, PLLS 12: 53–70.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. McC. (2013) ‘Greek Comedy and the Atellana’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana Preletteraria. Atti della seconda giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino: 7–27.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. (2004) ‘Hrotsvit’s Sapientia as a Foreign Woman’ in Brown, P. R., McMillin, L. A. and Wilson, K. (eds.) Hrotsvit of Gandersheim – Contexts, Identities, Affinities, and Performances. Toronto: 160–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. R., and Wailes, S. L. (eds.) (2012) A Companion to Hrotsvit of Gandersheim (fl. 960): Contextual and Interpretive Approaches. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. R. (2013) ‘Terence and Greek New Comedy’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 17–32.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. (2014) ‘The Beginnings of Roman Comedy’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 401–8.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1957) ‘Summum ius summa iniuria’ in Büchner, K. (ed.) Humanitas Romana. Studien über Werke und Wesen der Römer. Heidelberg: 80–105.Google Scholar
Buonocore, M. (ed.) (1996) Vedere i classici: l’illustrazione libraria dei testi antichi dall’età romana al tardo Medioevo (exhibition catalogue). Rome.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2000) ‘“Stumm wie ein Menander-Chor”: Ein zusätzliches Testimonium’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 131: 23–4.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990, 1999 rev. repr.) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York.Google Scholar
Cain, A. (2013) ‘Terence in Late Antiquity’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA and Oxford: 380–96.Google Scholar
Candiard, C. (2017) Esclaves et valets vedettes dans les comédies de la Rome antique et de la France d'Ancien Régime. Paris.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E., and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) (2007) Diritto e teatro a Grecia e a Roma. Milan.Google Scholar
Capitani, P. de (2005) Du spectaculaire à l’intime: un siècle de commedia erudita en Italie et en France, début du xvie siècle–milieu du xviie siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Cardelle de Hartmann, C. (2003) ‘Die Roswitha-Edition des Humanisten Conrad Celtis’ in Henkes, C., Hettche, W., Radecke, G., and Senne, E. (eds.) Schrift – Text – Edition. Tübingen: 137–47.Google Scholar
Cardoso, I. T. (2005) ‘Ars Plautina: Metalinguagem em gestos e figurino’. Unpublished Diss. University of São Paulo (USP).
Cardoso, I. T. (2009) ‘Theatrum mundi: Philologie und Nachahmung’ in Schwindt, J. (ed.) Was ist eine philologische Frage?. Frankfurt am Main: 82–111.Google Scholar
Cardoso, I. T. (2010) ‘Ilusão e engano em Plauto’ in Cardoso, Z. A. and Duarte, A. S. (eds.) Estudos sobre o teatro antigo. São Paulo: 95–126.Google Scholar
Carney, T. F. (1964) ‘The Words sodes and quaeso in Terentian Usage’, Acta Classica 7: 57–63.Google Scholar
Casson, L. (1976) ‘The Athenian Upper Class and New Comedy’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 106: 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, R. R. (2014) ‘Reinvention in Terence’s Eunuchus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 144: 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavarero, A. (2016) Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude, transl. A. S. Sitze and A. Minervini. Stanford.Google Scholar
Cerulli, E. (1970) ‘Le calife ‘Abd ar-Rahmān III de Cordove et le martyr Pélage dans un poème de Hrotsvitha’, Studia Islamica 32: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. (1980) ‘Musical Learning and Dramatic Action in Hrotsvit’s Pafnutius’, Studies in Philology 77: 319–43.Google Scholar
Charitonidis, S., Kahil, L., and Ginouvès, R. (1970) Les Mosaïques de la Maison du Ménandre à Mytilène. Bern.Google Scholar
Chelius, K. H. (1989) Die Codices minores des Plautus: Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kritik. Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2008) Plautus: Four Plays (Casina, Amphitryon, Captiui, Pseudolus). Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2010) Roman Comedy: Five Plays by Plautus and Terence. Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2013) ‘Eunuchus’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 262–80.Google Scholar
Clackson, J., and Horrocks, G. (2007) The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. (2007) Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clementi, G. (2009) La filologia plautina negli Adversaria di Adrien Turnèbe. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Cloud, J. D. (1989) ‘Satirists and the Law’ in Braund, S. H. (ed.) Satire and Society in Ancient Rome. Exeter: 49–67.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. (2009) The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K. (1977) ‘Eisenstein’s Subversive Adaptation’ in Peary, G. and Shatzkin, R. (eds.) The Classic American Novel and the Movies. New York: 245–56.Google Scholar
Comerci, G. (1994) ‘Humanitas, liberalitas, aequitas: Nuova paideia e mediazione sociale negli Adelphoe di Terenzio’, Bollettino di studi latini 24: 3–44.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (2004) ‘Monkey Business: Imitation, Authenticity and Identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, Classical Antiquity 23: 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrady, K. O. (1954) ‘Zu den deutschen Plautusübertragungen. Ein Überblick von Albrecht von Eyb bis zu J. M. R. Lenz’, Euphorion 48: 373–96.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. (1922) An Aristotelian Theory of Comedy: With an Adaptation of The Poetics, and a Translation of the Tractatus Coislinianus. New York.Google Scholar
Corno, D. del. (1975) ‘Alcuni aspetti del linguaggio di Menandro’, Studi classici e orientali 23: 13–48.Google Scholar
Costa, E. (1890) Il diritto privato romano nelle commedie di Plauto. Turin. (Reprint Rome 1968).Google Scholar
Costa, E. (1893) Il diritto privato nelle commedie di Terenzio. Bologna. (Reprint Rome 1970.)Google Scholar
Coulter, C. C. (1929) ‘The “Terentian” Comedies of a Tenth-Century Nun’, Classical Journal 24: 515–29.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. (1972) ‘Ambroise de Milan face aux comiques latins’, Revue des études latines 50: 223–31.Google Scholar
Creizenach, W. (1893) Geschichte des neuren Dramas I (Mittelalter und Frührenaissance). Halle.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (1999) ‘Performance and Iconographic Tradition in the Illustrations of Menander’ in Porter, J. (ed.) Crossing the Stages: The Production, Performance and Reception of Ancient Theater. Iowa City: 154–77.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (2000) ‘From Aristophanes to Menander? Genre Transformation in Greek Comedy’ in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA: 115–34.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (2010) ‘Cooking with Menander: Slices from the Ancient Home Entertainment Industry?’ in Csapo, E. (ed.) Actors and Ancient Theater. Malden, MA: 140–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlheim, A. W. (1968) Struktur und Entwicklung des römischen Völkerrechts im 3. und 2. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Damen, M. L. (1990) ‘Structure and Symmetry in Terence’s Adelphoe’, Illinois Classical Studies 15: 85–106.Google Scholar
Damen, M. L. (1992) ‘Translating Scenes: Plautus’ Adaptation of Menander’s Dis Exapaton’, Phoenix 46: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. L. (1995) ‘“By the Gods, Boy … Stop Bothering Me! Can’t You Tell Menander from Plautus?” Or How Dis Exapaton Does Not Help Us Understand Bacchides’, Antichthon 29: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danese, R. M. (1985) ‘Plauto, Pseud. 702–705a: la “costruzione stilistica” di un eroe perfetto’, Materiali e discussioni 14: 101–12.Google Scholar
Danese, R. M. (2006) ‘Plauto e l’urbanitas del dialetto’, Linguistica e Letteratura 31: 37–66.Google Scholar
Danese, R. M. (2002) ‘Modelli letterari e modelli culturali del teatro plautino’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 133–53.Google Scholar
Dareste, R. (1892) ‘Review of Costa 1890’, Journal de Savants 1892: 145–54, reprinted with slight modifications in R. Dareste (1902) Nouvelles études d’histoire du droit, as part of ‘Le droit romain et le droit grec dans Plaute’. Paris: 149–63.Google Scholar
Dareste, R. (1900) ‘Review of Costa 1890, Becker 1892, Pernard 1900 et al.’, Nouvelle revue historique de droit français et étranger 24: 677–87, reprinted with slight modifications in R. Dareste (1902) Nouvelles études d’histoire du droit, as part of ‘Le droit romain et le droit grec dans Plaute’. Paris: 163–75.
De Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1985) ‘“Conclusions”, Walter Benjamin’s “The Task of the Translator” Messenger Lecture, Cornell University, March 4, 1983’, Yale French Studies 69: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2007) The Early Latin Verbal System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2010) ‘The Language of Atellan Farce’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana letteraria: Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana: Succivo (CE) 30 Ottobre 2009. Urbino: 121–55.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2011a) ‘The Language of Roman Comedy’ in Clackson, J. (ed.) A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden, MA: 321–43.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2011b) Plautus: Amphitryon; The Comedy of Asses; The Pot of Gold; The Two Bacchises; The Captives. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2011c) Plautus: Casina; The Casket Comedy; Curculio; Epidicus; The Two Menaechmuses. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. D. C. (2013) Plautus: Stichus; Three-Dollar Day; Truculentus; The Tale of a Travelling-Bag; Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
De Zulueta, F. (1946) The Institutes of Gaius. Part 1. Text with Critical Notes and Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Debouy, E. (2010) ‘The Titles of the Atellanae: an Attempt at a Typology’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana letteraria: Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana: Succivo (CE) 30 Ottobre 2009. Urbino: 157–68.Google Scholar
Dees, R. L. (1988) ‘Aspects of the Roman Law of Marriage in Plautus’ Casina’, Iura 39: 107–20.Google Scholar
Del Zotto, C. (2009) Rosvita – La poetessa degli imperatori sassoni (Donne d’Oriente e d’Occidente 22). Milan.Google Scholar
Delehaye, H. (1936) Étude sur le légendier romain – Les saints de novembre et de décembre. Brussels: 227–35.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1986) Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, transl. D. Polan and R. Bensmaïa. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Denard, H. (2007) ‘Lost Theatre and Performance Traditions in Greece and Italy’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 139–60.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1985) ‘Deconstruction in America: An Interview with Jacques Derrida’, Critical Exchange 17: 1–33.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1996) Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, transl. E. Prenowitz. Chicago.Google Scholar
Dessen, C. S. (1977) ‘Plautus’ Satiric Comedy: the Truculentus’, Philological Quarterly 56: 145–68.Google Scholar
Dessen, C. S. (1995) ‘The Figure of the Eunuch in Terence’s Eunuchus’, Helios 22: 123–39.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., and Vernant, J.-P. (1991) Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, transl. J. Lloyd. Chicago.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2002) Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, A. (1962) ‘Echi terenziani in Orazio’, Rendiconti della Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti di Napoli, N.S. 37: 35–57.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. (1981) ‘The Disavowal of Invidia in Roman Iamb and Satire’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 3: 183–208.Google Scholar
Dietl, C. (2005) Die Dramen Jacob Lochers und die frühe Humanistenbühne im süddeutschen Raum. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittrich, P. (1915) ‘Plautus und Terenz in Pädagogik und Schulwesen der deutschen Humanisten’. Diss. Leipzig.
Dolezal, M. L. (1996) ‘The Elusive Quest for the “Real Thing”: The Chicago Lectionary Project Thirty Years On’, Gesta 35: 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donadio, N. (2007) ‘Le auctiones private all’epoca di Plauto’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma’. Milan: 117–97.Google Scholar
Donderer, M. (2008) ‘Antike Musterbücher und (k)ein Ende: Ein neuer Papyrus und die Aussage der Mosaiken’, Musiva et Sectilia 2–3: 81–113.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1999) Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology. London and Boston.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2016) ‘Plautus and the Politics of Property: Reification, Recognition, and Utopia’, MD 77: 9–56.Google Scholar
Dronke, P. (1984) ‘Hrotsvitha’ in Dronke, P. (ed.) Women Writers of the Middle Ages – A Critical Study of Texts from Perpetua († 203) to Marguerite Porete († 1310). Cambridge: 55–83.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1952/1994) The Nature of Roman Comedy. A Study in Popular Entertainment, Princeton, NJ. Second edition (1994) with a foreword and bibliographical appendix by R. Hunter, Norman, OK, and Bristol.Google Scholar
Dunn, W. R. (1984) ‘Formal Language in Plautus’. Diss. Harvard.
Dutsch, D. (2002) ‘Towards a Grammar of Gesture. A Comparison Between Types of Hand Movements of the Actor and the Orator in Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria 11.3.85–184’, Gesture 2.2: 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2004) ‘Female Furniture: a Reading of Plautus’ Poenulus 1141–6’, Classical Quarterly 54.2: 625–30.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2005) ‘Roman Pharmacology: Plautus’ blanda venena’, Greece and Rome 52.2: 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2008) Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutsch, D., and Konstan, D. (2011) ‘Women’s Emotions in New Comedy’ in Munteanu, D. (ed.) Emotion, Genre, Gender in Antiquity. London: 57–88.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D., James, S., and Konstan, D. (2015) Women in Republican Roman Drama. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Easterling, P., and Hall, E. (eds.) (2002) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ehrman, R. K. (1985) ‘Terentian Prologues and the Parabases of Old Comedy’, Latomus 44: 370–6.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R., et al. (eds.) (2004) Records of Early English Drama (2 vols). Oxford and Toronto.Google Scholar
Fachechi, G. M. (1998) ‘Amphitruo Illustrato’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (ed.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates I Amphitruo. Urbino: 89–96.Google Scholar
Fachechi, G. M. (2002) ‘Plauto illustrato fra Medioevo e Umanesimo’, Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei 13: 177–242.Google Scholar
Falcone, G. (1988) ‘Testimonianze Plautine in tema di interdicta’, Annali del Seminario Giuridico dell’Univ. di Palermo 40: 175–213.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1965) ‘The Curculio of Plautus: An Illustration of Plautine Methods in Adaptation’, Classical Quarterly 59: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1968a) ‘Terence, Diphilus and Menander: A Reexamination of Terence Adelphoe Act II’, Philologus 112: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1968b) ‘Act IV of the Menaechmi: Plautus and His Greek Original’, Classical Philology 63: 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1975) ‘Sex, Status, and Survival in Hellenistic Athens: a Study of Women in New Comedy’, Phoenix 29: 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978) ‘Adaptation and Survival: A Genre Study of Roman Comedy in Relation to Its Greek Sources’ in Ruggiers, P. G. (ed.) Versions of Medieval Comedy. Norman, OK: 297–317.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1988) ‘Mime: The Missing Link in Roman Literary History’, The Classical World 82: 153–63.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1993) ‘The Growth of Literature and Criticism at Rome’ in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, I: Classical Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2000) ‘DOMINA-tricks’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: 287–99.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Orator and/et Actor’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 362–76.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004a) ‘Women of the Demi-monde and Sisterly Solidarity in the Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 221–38.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004b) ‘Maiden in Other-land or Broads Abroad: Plautus’ Poenulae’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus. Tübingen: 235–51.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004c) ‘Literature of the Roman Republic’ in Flower, H. I. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge: 271–93.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004d) ‘Terence and the Familiarisation of Comedy’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 20–34.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004e) ‘Disowning and Dysfunction in the Declamatory Family’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 53: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. (ed.) (1906) Early English Dramatists. Anonymous Plays, Third Series. London.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010) ‘Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus’, Classical Philology 105: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. (ed.) (2004) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, T. (2009) ‘Sermo corporis: Ancient Reflections on gestus, vultus and vox’ in Fögen, T. (ed.) Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin and New York: 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014a) ‘Between Two Paradigms: Plautus’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 516–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014b) ‘The Terentian Reformation: From Menander to Alexandria’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 538–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014c) ‘Dynamic of Appropriation in Roman Comedy: Menander’s Kolax in Three Roman Receptions (Naevius, Plautus, and Terence’s Eunuchus)’ in Olson, S. D. (ed.) Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin and Boston: 180–202.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014d) ‘The Reception of Greek Comedy in Rome’ in Revermann, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy. Cambridge: 404–23.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2015) Joannes Burmeister: Aulularia and other Inversions of Plautus. Leuven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M., and Scafuro, A. (eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forehand, W. E. (1973) ‘The Use of Imagery in Plautus’ Miles Gloriosus’, Rivista di studi classici 21: 5–16.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1922) Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin. (Translated into Italian (1960) Elementi Plautini and into English (2007) Plautine Elements.)Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1960) Elementi Plautini in Plauto. Florence. (Translation with addenda of Plautinisches im Plautus, Berlin (1922).)Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2007) Plautine Elements in Plautus, Oxford. (Translation by Tomas Drevikovsky and Frances Muecke of Plautinisches im Plautus, Berlin (1922).)Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. (1994) ‘Palaestrio as Playwright: Plautus, Miles Gloriosus 209–212’ in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VII. Brussels: 72–86.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. (1995) ‘The Parasite as Poet-playwright and the Slave as Parasite in Terence’s Phormio’, Bollettino di studi latini 25.2: 397–425.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. (1996) ‘(Meta)theatre as Therapy in Terence’s Phormio’, Classica et Mediaevalia 47: 169–206.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. (2013) ‘Phormio’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 281–94.Google Scholar
Franko, G. F. (1999) ‘Imagery and Names in Plautus’ Casina’, Classical Journal 95: 1–17.Google Scholar
Franko, G. F. (2013) ‘Terence and the Traditions of Roman New Comedy’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA and Oxford: 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, G. F. (2014) ‘Festivals, Producers, Theatrical Spaces, and Records’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, D. W. (1996) ‘Respecting Terence, Adelphoe 155–75’, Classical World 90: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredershausen, O. (1906) ‘De iure Plautino et Terentiano’. Diss. Göttingen.
Fredershausen, O. (1912) ‘Weitere Studien über das Recht bei Plautus und Terenz’, Hermes 47: 199–249.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1957–81) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud XI. London.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1971) ‘Philologische Bemerkungen zur Sentenz “Summum ius summa iniuria”’ in Studi in onore di Edoardo Volterra II. Milan: 53–81.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (2011a) Das antike Recht und die griechisch-römische Neue Komödie: Untersuchungen zu Plautus und seinen griechischen Vorbildern I (2 vols). Habil. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (2011b) Das antike Recht und die griechisch-römische Neue Komödie: Untersuchungen zu Plautus und seinen griechischen Vorbildern II (2 vols). Habil. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (2018) ‘Die Funktion des mancipium in der römischen Komödie’ in Nesselrath, H.-G and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 137–61.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2005) ‘The Unity of Greek Law’ in Gagarin, M. and Cohen, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, L. (2007) ‘La figura del giudice privato del processo civile romano. Per un’analisi storico-sociologica sulla base delle fonti letterarie (da Plauto a Macrobio)’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma. Milan: 199–217. (Reprinted in German with slight modifications as Gagliardi (2008)).Google Scholar
Gagliardi, L. (2008) ‘Zur Figur des iudex privatus im römischen Zivilprozess. Eine historisch-soziologische Untersuchung auf der Grundlage literarischer Quellen’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 55: 241–66. (= German version of Gagliardi (2007) with slight modifications.)Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. (1972) ‘Zur Eigenart der römischen Komödie: Plautus und Terenz gegenüber ihren griechischen Vorbildern’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I.2. Berlin and New York: 1027–113.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (1966) ‘Scipionic Themes in Plautus’ Amphitruo’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97: 203–35.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (1969) ‘Plautus’ Poenulus and the Cult of Venus Erycina’ in Bibauw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard I. Brussels: 358–64.Google Scholar
Germany, R. (2013) ‘Andria’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 225–42.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. H. (1913) ‘Thomas Heywood’s Debt to Plautus’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 12: 593–611.Google Scholar
Gilleland, M. E. (1979) ‘Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence’. Diss. Charlottesville.
Gilula, D. (1980) ‘The Concept of bona meretrix: A Study of Terence’s Courtesans’, Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 108: 142–65.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. (1981) ‘Who’s Afraid of Rope-walkers and Gladiators? (Ter. Hec. 1–57)’, Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. (1989) ‘Greek Drama in Rome: Some Aspects of Cultural Transposition’ in Scolnicov, H. and Holland, P. (eds.) The Play Out of Context. Transferring Plays from Culture to Culture. Cambridge: 99–109.Google Scholar
Giovini, M. (2001) ‘Riscritture Terenziane – il motivo delle “nozze simulate” nel Gallicanus’, Maia 53: 649–73.Google Scholar
Giovini, M. (2006a) ‘Elementi poetici e drammatici nel Delusor (X sec.)’, Studi umanistici piceni 26: 126–47.Google Scholar
Giovini, M. (2006b) ‘La cucina infernale e la mirabile illusione: Il Dulcitius di Rosvita fra drammaturgia e innografia’, Mediaevalia 27: 155–83.Google Scholar
Girard, P. F. (1893) ‘Review of Costa 1890, Bekker 1892 et al.’, Nouvelle revue historique de droit français et étranger 17: 789–97.Google Scholar
Giraudoux, J. (1967) Three Plays, Volume 2 – Siegfried; Amphitryon 38; Electra, transl. Phyllis La Farge and Peter Judd. London.Google Scholar
Goetting, H. (1950) ‘Die Anfänge des Reichsstifts Gandersheim’, Braunschweigisches Jahrbuch 31: 5–52.Google Scholar
Goetting, H. (1973) Die Bistümer der Kirchenprovinz Mainz – Das Bistum Hildesheim I: Das Reichsunmittelbare Kanonissenstift Gandersheim. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gold, B. (1998) ‘“Vested Interests” in Plautus’ Casina: Cross-Dressing in Roman Comedy’, Helios 25: 17–29.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1983) ‘Terence, Cato, and the Rhetorical Prologue’, Classical Philology 78: 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1989) ‘Poetry, Politics, and Ennius’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 119: 247–61.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1990) ‘Act to Action in Plautus’ Bacchides’, Classical Philology 85: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1995) ‘Improvisation, Plot, and Plautus’ Curculio’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 33–41.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1998) ‘Plautus on the Palatine’, Journal of Roman Studies 88: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2000) ‘Catullus 42 and the Comic Legacy’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: 475–89.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2004) ‘Plautus and his Alternatives. Textual Doublets in Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 385–98.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2005) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Poetry and its Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2007a) ‘Comedy and society from Menander to Terence’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 124–38.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2007b) ‘Reading Roman Tragedy’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 13.4: 571–84.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2007c) ‘The Early Republic: the Beginnings to 90 BC’ in Harrison, S. (ed.) A Companion to Latin Literature. Oxford: 15–30.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2018) ‘Theater without Theaters: Seeing Plays the Roman Way’, TAPA 148: 139–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldoni, C. (1787) Mémoires de Goldoni, pour servir à l’histoire de ma vie et à celle du théâtre. Paris.Google Scholar
Gordan, P. W. G. (1974) Two Renaissance Book Hunters: The Letters of Poggius Bracciolini to Nicholaus de Niccolis. New York and London.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. (2008) ‘Cultural Differences and Cross-Cultural Contact: Greek and Roman Concepts of Power’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 179–230.Google Scholar
Goullet, M. (1993) ‘Les drames de Hrotsvita de Gandersheim, édition critique avec introduction, traduction, et notes.’ Diss. Metz.
Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2004) ‘The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 150–66.Google Scholar
Graf, F. (1992) ‘Gestures and Conventions: the Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators’ in Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.) A Cultural History of Gesture. Ithaca, NY: 36–58.Google Scholar
Grant, J. N. (1975) ‘The Ending of Terence’s Adelphoe and the Menandrian original’, American Journal of Philology 96: 42–60.
Grant, J. N. (1986) Studies in the Textual Tradition of Terence. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London.CrossRef
Gratwick, A. S. (1973) ‘Titus Maccius Plautus’, Classical Quarterly 23: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1982a) ‘Drama’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: 77–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1982b) ‘Light Drama’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: 93–127. (= Subsection of Gratwick, (1982a).)Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1995) ‘The Schizophrenic Lover and the Logic of Farce: Plautus, Bacchides 500–511’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 97–106.Google Scholar
Green, J. R. (1985) ‘Drunk Again: A Study in the Iconography of the Comic Theater’, American Journal of Archeology 89: 465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. (1993) Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2007) ‘“Telling the Tale”: A Performing Tradition from Homer to Pantomime’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grilli, A. (1979) ‘Educazione urbana ed educazione rustica in Terenzio’ in La città antica come fatto di cultura: Atti del convegno di Como e Bellagio, 16–19 giugno 1979. Como: 23–34.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1986) ‘Analyse du Trinummus et les débuts de la philosophie à Rome’ in Grimal, P. (ed.) Rome. La literature et l’histoire I. Rome: 363–75.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. (1974) ‘Des Conradus Celtis Editio Princeps der Opera Hrotsvite von 1501 und Albrecht Dürers Anteil daran’, Philobiblon 18: 3–25.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne. (Paperback edition: Berkeley and London (1996)).Google Scholar
Guastella, G. (1988) La contaminazione e il parassita. Due studi su teatro e cultura romana. Pisa.Google Scholar
Guastella, G. (2002) ‘I monologhi di ingresso dei parassiti: Plauto e i modeli’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 155–98.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2009) Nox Philologiae. Aulus Gellius and the Fantasy of the Roman Library. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2017) ‘Rhetoric and Declamation’ in MacDonald, M. J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Oxford: 267–78.Google Scholar
Günther, O. (1886) Plautuserneuerungen in der deutschen Literatur des XV.–XVII. Jahrhunderts und ihre Verfasser. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1997) ‘Geschichte der Bildung: Artes liberales’ in Graf, F. (ed.) Einleitung in die lateinische Philologie. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 17–34.Google Scholar
Haight, A. L. (ed.) (1965) Hroswitha of Gandersheim – Her Life, Times, and Works, and a Comprehensive Bibliography. New York.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2002) ‘The Singing Actors of Antiquity’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 3–38.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1993) ‘Plautine Ingredients in the Performance of the Pseudolus’, Classical World 87: 21–6.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2008) Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halporn, J. (1993) ‘Roman Comedy and Greek Models’ in Scodel, R. (ed.)Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: 191–213.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2009) ‘What is Politics in the Ancient World?’ in Balot, R. K. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA: 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, M., Mack, A. M., and Moskalew, W. (eds.) (1963) Plautus, Miles Gloriosus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. (2001) ‘Actoris opera: Words, Action and Acting in Dis Exapaton and Bacchides’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates IV: Bacchides. Urbino: 13–36.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. (2002a) ‘Acting, Action and Words in New Comedy’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge and New York: 165–88.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. (2002b) ‘Theme and Variations. A Comparative Study in Plautine Comedy’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 105–20.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. (2011) ‘The Rediscovery of Menander’ in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. (eds.) Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 138–59.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (1959) ‘Plautus as a Source Book for Roman Religion’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 90: 48–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (1965) ‘The Glorious Military’ in Dorey, T. A. and Dudley, D. R. (eds.) Roman Drama. London: 51–85.Google Scholar
Happ, H. (1967) ‘Die lateinische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus’, Glotta 45: 60–104.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. F. (2007) ‘Encountering Plautus in the Renaissance: A Humanist Debate on Comedy’, Renaissance Quarterly 60.3: 789–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. S. (2005) ‘The Parasite’s Daughter: Metatheatrical Costuming in Plautus’ Persa’, Classical World 99: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, B. (2007) ‘Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches’ in Booth, J. (ed.) Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: 129–47.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1987) ‘“Thieves, Harlots and Stinking Goats”: Fashionable Dress and Aesthetic Attitudes in Romanesque Art’, Costume 21: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrsen, M. (1965) ‘The Manuscripts’ in Haight, A. L. (ed.) Hroswitha of Gandersheim. New York: 42–53.Google Scholar
Harsh, P. W. (1940) ‘The Position of Archaic Forms in the Verse of Plautus’, Classical Philology 35: 126–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartkamp, R. F. (2004) Von ‘leno’ zu ‘ruffiano’: die Darstellung, Entwicklung und Funktion der Figur des Kupplers in der römischen Palliata und in der italienischen Renaissancekomödie. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. B. (1986) ‘Historical Topicality in Plautus’, The Classical Word 79: 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haury, A. (1976) ‘Une “Année de la femme” à Rome, 195 avant J.-C.?’, L’Italie préromaine et la Rome républicaine. Paris: 427–36.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1999) ‘Entertaining Arguments: Terence, Adelphoe’ in Henderson, J. (ed.) Writing Down Rome. Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. Oxford: 38–68.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2004) ‘Terence’s Selbstaussöhnung: Payback Time of the Self (Heautontimorumenus)’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 53–81.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2009) (ed.) A Plautus Reader: Selections from Eleven Plays. Mundelein, IL.Google Scholar
Henry, M. M. (1985) Menander’s Courtesans and the Greek Comic Tradition. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hermand, L. (2011) ‘Homo sum: l’usage cicéronien des maximes de Térence’ in Mauduit, Ch. and Paré-Rey, P. (eds.) Les Maximes théâtrales en Grèce et à Rome: transferts, réécritures, remplois. Lyon: 295–304.Google Scholar
Herrmann, M. (1893) ‘Terenz in Deutschland bis zum Ausgang des 16. Jahrhunderts’, Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für deutsche Erziehungs- und Schulgeschichte 3: 1–28.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. (ed.) (1989) Restauration und Erneuerung. Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Heywood, T. (1874) The Dramatic Works of Thomas Heywood, ed. Shepherd, R. H. (6 vols). London.Google Scholar
Hindsholm, S. C. (1990) Plautus’ verden: økonomiske og sociale relationer i komedierne. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W. (1995) ‘Die Körpersprache der Schauspieler als Mittel des Komischen bei Plautus’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 205–18.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and his Achievement. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1994) ‘Rights of Way in Ovid (Heroides 20.146) and Plautus (Curculio 36)’, Classical Quarterly 44: 545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homeyer, H. (1968) ‘“Imitatio” and “aemulatio” im Werk der Hrotsvitha von Gandersheim’, Studi Medievali 9, 966–79.Google Scholar
Hosley, R. (1967) ‘The Formal Influence of Plautus and Terence’ in Brown, J. R. and Harris, B. (ed.) Elizabethan Theatre. New York: 130–45.Google Scholar
Höttemann, B. (1993) ‘Phlyakenposse und Atellane’ in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.) Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen: 89–112.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. (2006) ‘Review of Richlin, A. (2005)’, Rome and the Mysterious Orient: Three Plays by Plautus, translated with introductions and notes. Berkeley, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2006.05.35. Accessed on 18 September 2017 at: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006-05-35.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1980) ‘Philemon, Plautus, and the Trinummus’, Museum Helveticum 37: 216–30.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1981) ‘The Aulularia of Plautus and its Greek Original’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 27: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2002) ‘Acting Down: the Ideology of Hellenistic Performance’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 189–206.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus. Studies in the Reception of Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, J.-M. (2004) ‘Le Disexapaton de Ménandre, modèle des Bacchides de Plaute’, Revue des études anciennes 106: 23–47.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1945) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (3 vols), transl. Gilbert Highet. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jakobi, R. (1996) Die Kunst der Exegese im Terenzkommentar des Donat. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. L. (1998a) ‘Introduction: Constructions of Gender and Genre in Roman Comedy and Elegy’, Helios 25: 3–16.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1998b) ‘From Boys to Men: Rape and Developing Masculinity in Terence’s Hecyra and Eunuchus’, Helios 25: 31–47.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2005) ‘Effeminate Elegy, Comic Women and the Gender of Language: Recovering a Female Voice in Latin’, paper for the January 2005 APA Seminar ‘The Gender of Latin’. Boston.
James, S. L. (2010) ‘Trafficking Pasicompsa: A Courtesan’s Travels and Travails in Plautus’ Mercator’, New England Classical Journal 37: 39–50.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2013) ‘Gender and Sexuality in Terence’, in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 175–94.Google Scholar
Janan, M. (1994) When the Lamp is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. E. (2005) ‘At Play with Writing: Letters and Readers in Plautus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 135: 359–92.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. (1998) ‘“Like Shining from Shook Foil”: Liturgical Typology in Hrotsvit’s Legends and Dramas’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 33: 37–52.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (1997) ‘Aulus Gellius als Literaturkritiker: Impressionist oder Systematiker? Versuch einer Aufstellung seiner literaturkritischen Werttypologie’, Classica et Mediaevalia 48: 359–88.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1969) ‘The Poet Cn. Naevius, P. Cornelius Scipio and Q. Caecilius Metellus’, Antichthon 3: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1973) ‘Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto (Terence, Heauton timorumenos 77)’, Antichthon 7: 14–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1995) ‘Horace and the Reputation of Plautus in the Late First Century BC’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace. A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: 228–47.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (2000) ‘The Unpretty Boy of Plautus’ Pseudolus (767–789)’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York: 431–60.Google Scholar
Johnson Chase, W. (1922) The Distichs of Cato, A Famous Medieval Textbook. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, H. F., and Nicholas, B. (3rd edn 1972) Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, L. W., and Morey, C. R. (1930–1) The Miniatures of the Manuscripts of Terence prior to the Thirteenth Century (2 vols). Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Jonson, B. (2012) Works, eds. Bevington, D., Butler, M. and Donaldson, I. (7 vols). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jory, E. J. (1963) ‘“Algebraic” Notation in Dramatic Texts’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 10: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, H. (1972) Pompa diaboli. Die lateinischen Kirchenväter und das antike Theater. Stuttgart, Berlin, Cologne and Mainz.Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. (2015) ‘Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis’ in Johnston, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Cambridge: 119–48.Google Scholar
Karabélias, E. (1970) ‘Une nouvelle source pour l’étude du droit attique: Le “Bouclier” de Ménandre (P. Bodmer XXVI)’, Revue internationale de droit français et étranger 48: 357–89.Google Scholar
Karabélias, E. (2002) L’ épiclérat attique: Recherches sur la condition juridique de la fille épiclère athénienne. Athens.Google Scholar
Karabélias, E. (2004) Recherches sur la condition juridique et sociale de la fille unique dans le monde grec ancien excepté Athènes. Athens.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2003) ‘Legal Language in Plautus with Special Reference to “Trinummus”’, Mnemosyne 56: 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2014) ‘The Language of the Palliata’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 555–79.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (2nd edn 1971) Das Römische Privatrecht. Erster Abschnitt. Das altrömische, das vorklassische und klassische Recht. Munich.Google Scholar
Katsouris, A. G. (1975) Linguistic and Stylistic Characterisation: Tragedy and Menander. Ioannina.Google Scholar
Kauer, R., and Lindsay, W. M. (1926) Comoediae: Andria, Heauton Timorumenos, Eunuchus, Phormio, Hecyra, Adelphoe. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kauer, R., and Lindsay, W. M. (1958 and 1961) P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford. (Reprint of 1926 edn with additions by Skutsch, O..)Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (1982) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kes, B. R. (1988) Die Rezeption der Komödien des Plautus und Terenz im 19. Jahrhundert: Theorie – Bearbeitung – Bühne. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Killeen, J. F. (1973) ‘Plautus Miles Gloriosus 211’, Classical Philology 68: 53–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleve, K. (1996) ‘How to Read an Illegible Papyrus. Towards an Edition of PHerc. 78, Caecilius Statius, Obolostates sive Faenerator’, Cronache Ercolanesi 26: 5–14.Google Scholar
Knapp, C. (1907) ‘Travels in Ancient Times as Seen in Plautus and Terence’, Classical Philology 2: 1–24 and 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, T. (1986) ‘Das römische Sprichwort – Abgrenzungen, Formen, Anwendung’ in Neukam, P. (ed.) Reflexionen antiker Kulturen. Munich: 47–59.Google Scholar
Knorr, O. (1995) ‘The Character of Bacchis in Heautontimoroumenos’, American Journal of Philology 116.2: 221–35.Google Scholar
Knorr, O. (2007) ‘Metatheatrical Humor in the Comedies of Terence’ in Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W. W., and Felgentreu, F. (eds.) Terentius Poeta. Munich: 167–74.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1986) ‘Love in Terence’s Eunuch: The Origins of Erotic Subjectivity’, American Journal of Philology 107.3: 369–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D., and Raval, S. (2018) ‘Comic Violence and the Citizen Body’ in Gale, M. and Scourfield, D. (eds.) Texts and Violence in the Roman World. Cambridge and New York: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhardt, H. (1954) ‘Restitutio in integrum bei Terenz’ in Hiltbrunner, O. (ed.) Thesaurismata. Munich: 65–78.Google Scholar
Korzeniewski, U. (2003) Sophokles! Die Alten! Philoktet! Lessing und die antiken Dramatiker. Konstanz.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, M. T. (2014) ‘Autorità e no: Alcune considerazioni sul progetto antiterenziano di Rosvita di Gandersheim’ in D’Angelo, E. and Ziolkowski, J. (eds.) Auctor et Auctoritas in Latinis medii aevi litteris: Author and Authorship in Medieval Latin Literature. Florence: 555–65.Google Scholar
Krieter Spiro, M. (1997) Sklaven, Köche und Hetären: das Dienstpersonal bei Menander: Stellung, Rolle, Komik und Sprache. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2002) ‘Ist Geld die “Wurzel allen Übels”? Zur Interpretation von Plautus’ Aulularia’, Hermes 130: 146–63.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H. (1950) ‘Hrotsviths von Gandersheim dichterisches Programm’, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 24: 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2018) ‘Das Epiklerat im Phormio des Terenz und im Ἐπιδικαζόμενος des Apollodor von Karystos’ in Nesselrath, H.-G. and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 111–35.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1939) ‘Fides als schöpferisches Element im römischen Schuldrecht’ in Kaser, M., Kreller, H. and Kunkel, W. (eds.) Festschrift Paul Koschaker II (3 vols). Weimar: 1–15.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2004) ‘Authorial Voice and Theatrical Self-definition in Terence and Beyond: The “Hecyra” Prologues in Ancient and Modern Contexts’, Greece and Rome (Ser. 2) 51.1: 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lallier, R. (1878) ‘Le procès du Phormion. Etude sur les moeurs judiciaires d’Athènes’, Annuaire de l’association des études grecques en France 12: 48–62.Google Scholar
Lape, S. (2004a) ‘The Terentian Marriage-Plot: Reproducing Fathers and Sons’ in Boyle, A. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 35–52.Google Scholar
Lape, S. (2004b) Reproducing Athens: Menander’s Comedy, Democratic Culture, and the Hellenistic City. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Lawton, H. W. (1926) Contribution à l’histoire de l’humanisme: Térence en France au xvie siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B. (2014) ‘The Diffusion of Comedy from the Age of Alexander to the Beginning of the Roman Empire’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 359–77.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1969) ‘Meam quom formam noscito. Language and Characterization in Menaechmi’, Arethusa 2: 30–45.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1971) ‘Horace’s pater optimus and Terence’s Demea: Autobiographical Fiction and Comedy in sermo I. 4’, American Journal of Philology 92: 616–32.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1974) ‘Plautus’ Rudens: Venus Born from a Shell’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 15: 915–32.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1978a) ‘Plautus-Studien II: die Brief-Intrigue in Menanders Dis exapaton und ihre Verdoppelung in den Bacchides’, Hermes 106: 518–38.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1978b) Der Phormio des Terenz und der Epidikazomenos des Apollodor von Karystos. Munich.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1982) Maccus vortit barbare. Vom tragischen Amphitryon zum tragikomischen Amphitruo. Mainz and Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1990) ‘Politik und Gesellschaft in Plautus’ Trinummus’ in Blänsdorf, J. (with André, J.-M. and Frick, N.) (eds.) Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Tübingen: 45–54. (Reprinted in English in R. Scodel (ed.) (1993) Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: 177–90.)Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1998) ‘Plautus’ Captiui oder die Palliata als Prätexta’ in Benz, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.) Maccus barbarus. Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität der Captivi des Plautus. Tübingen: 9–50.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2001) ‘Menander, Dis Exapaton 6–113 und Plautus, Bacchides 500–561’ in Benz, L. (ed.) Scriptoralia Romana. Die Römische Literatur zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Tübingen: 141–68.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2010) ‘Atellana e palliata: gli influssi reciproci’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana Letteraria. Atti della Prima Giornata di Studi sull’Atellana. Succivo (CE) 30 ottobre 2009. Urbino: 89–123.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (1991) Plautus barbarus: sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. (2012) The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentano, M. (1993) ‘Parce ac duriter, Catone, Plauto e una formula felice’, Maia n.s. 45: 11–16.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1895) Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1912) Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Licht, T. (2008) ‘Hrotsvitspuren in ottonischer Dichtung (nebst einem neuen Hrotsvitgedicht)’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 43: 347–53.Google Scholar
Little, A. McN. G. (1938) ‘Plautus and Popular Drama’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 49: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwan, P. A. (1984) ‘Die Plautus-Übersetzungen des Albrecht von Eyb: Lateinisch-deutsche Textausgabe’. Diss. Basle, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, and New York.
Livingstone, I. (2004) A Linguistic Commentary on Livius Andronicus. New York and London.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. (1911) Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der lateinischen Sprache. Uppsala.Google Scholar
López Fonseca, A. (1998) ‘San Jerónimo, lector de los cómicos latinos: cristianos y paganos’, Cuadernos de filología clásica. Estudios latinos 15: 333–52.Google Scholar
Lowden, J. (1992) The Octateuchs: A Study in Byzantine Manuscript Illustration. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. (1989) ‘Plautus’ Parasites and the Atellana’ in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.) Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom. Tübingen: 161–9.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. (1992) ‘Aspects of Plautus’ Originality in the Asinaria’, Classical Quarterly 42: 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. (2001) ‘Greek and Roman Elements in Epidicus’ Intrigue’ in Auhagen, U. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Epidicus. Tübingen: 57–70.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. (2003) ‘The Lot-drawing Scene in Plautus’ Casina’, Classical Quarterly 53: 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. (2007) ‘Some Problems of Dramatic Space in Plautus’, Classical Quarterly 57: 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, N. J. (2006) ‘Aristophanic Spacecraft’ in Kozak, L. and Rich, J. (eds.) Playing Around Aristophanes. Oxford: 48–64.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2005) ‘Slander and Horse Law in Horace, Sermones 2.1’, Law and Literature 17: 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1968) ‘The Originality of Terence and His Greek Models’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 9: 169–82.Google Scholar
Lumley, E. P. (1901) The Influence of Plautus on the Comedies of Ben Jonson. New York.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (1982) ‘Love Versus the Law: An Essay on Menander’s Aspis’, Greece and Rome 29: 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKendrick, P. (1954) ‘Demetrius of Phalerum, Cato and the Adelphoe’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 32: 18–35.Google Scholar
Major, W. E. (1997) ‘Menander in a Macedonian World’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 38: 41–73.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (2001) ‘Brooklyn-on-the-Tiber: Roman Comedy on Broadway and in Film’ in Joshel, S. R., Malamud, M., and McGuire, D. T., Jr. (eds.) Imperial Projections. Ancient Rome in Modern Popular Culture. Baltimore and London: 191–208.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1976) ‘A Comparative Study of the Language of Plautus and Terence’, Diss. Cambridge.
Maltby, R. (1979) ‘Linguistic Characterisation of Old Men in Terence’, Classical Philology 74: 136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. (1983) ‘The Last Act of Terence’s Heautontimoroumenos’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 4: 27–41.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1985) ‘The Distribution of Greek Loan-words in Terence’, Classical Quarterly 35: 110–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. (1995) ‘The Distribution of Greek Loan-words in Plautus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 31–69.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2007) ‘The Distribution of Imagery by Plays and Characters in Terence’ in Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W. W., and Felgentreu, F. (eds.) Terentius Poeta. Munich: 143–65.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2001) Fabulae praetextae. Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer. Munich.Google Scholar
Maquerlot, J.-P. (1992) ‘Playing Within the Play. Towards a Semiotics of Metadrama and Metatheatre’ in Laroque, F. (ed.) The Show Within: Dramatic and Other Insets; English Renaissance Drama (1550–1642). Montpellier: 39–49.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (1999) ‘Quis Hic Loquitur?: Plautine Delivery and the ‘Double Aside’, Syllecta Classica 10: 105–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2006) The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2010) ‘Living Next Door to a Roman Comedy: Structure in Plautus’ Mercator’, New England Classical Journal 37: 65–78.Google Scholar
Marti, H. (1959) Untersuchungen zur dramatischen Technik bei Plautus und Terenz. Winterthur.Google Scholar
Marti, H. (1974) Zeugnisse zur Nachwirkung des Dichters Terenz im Altertum. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. (1995) ‘A Not-so-minor Character in Terence’s Eunuchus’, Classical Philology 90: 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzner, S., and Harrison, S. (2018) Complex Inferiorities: The Politics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ch, Mauduit., and Paré-Rey, P. (eds.) (2011) Les Maximes théâtrales en Grèce et à Rome: transferts, réécritures, remplois. Lyon.Google Scholar
Maurice, L. (2007) ‘Structure and Stagecraft in Plautus’ Miles Gloriosus’, Mnemosyne 60: 407–26.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., and Walton, M. (eds.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElduff, S. (2004) ‘More than Menander’s Acolyte: Terence on Translation’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 120–9.Google Scholar
McMillin, L. A. (2004) ‘“Weighed Down with a Thousand Evils”: Images of Muslims in Hrotsvit’s Pelagius’ in Brown, P. R., McMillin, L. A., and Wilson, K. (eds.) Hrotsvit of Gandersheim: Contexts, Identities, Affinities, and Performances. Toronto, Buffalo, NY and London: 40–55.Google Scholar
McNamee, K. (2007) Annotations in Greek and Latin Texts from Egypt. New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiss, M. (1974) French Painting in the Time of Jean de Berry. The Limbourgs and Their Contemporaries (2 vols). New York.Google Scholar
Michalka, E. (1968) ‘Studien über Intention und Gestaltung in den dramatischen Werken Hrotsvits von Gandersheim’. Diss. Heidelberg. Clausthal-Zellerfeld.
Millar, F. (1984) ‘The Political Character of the Roman Republic, 200–151 B.C.’,Journal of Roman Studies 74: 1–19.CrossRef
Millett, P. (1983) ‘Maritime Loans and the Structure of Credit in Fourth-Century Athens’ in Garnsey, P., Hopkins, K., and Whittaker, R. (eds.) Trade in the Ancient Economy. Berkeley: 36–52.Google Scholar
Minarini, A. (1987) ‘Conflitto d’amore: Terenzio in Catullo’ in Minarini, A., Studi Terenziani. Bologna: 59–79.Google Scholar
Miniconi, P. J. (1958) ‘Les termes d’injure dans le théâtre comique’, Revue des études latines 36: 159–75.Google Scholar
Monda, S. (2013) ‘La preistoria dell’Atellana nelle fonti storiche e letterarie’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana preletteraria. Atti sella seconda giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino: 95–124.Google Scholar
Moodie, E. (2009) ‘Old Men and Metatheatre in Terence: Terence’s Dramatic Competition’, Ramus 38: 145–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1991) ‘Palliata Togata: Plautus, Curculio 462–86’, American Journal of Philology 112: 343–62.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1998a) ‘Music and Structure in Roman Comedy’, American Journal of Philology 119: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1999) ‘Facing the Music: Character and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, Syllecta classica 19: 130–53.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2007) ‘Terence as Musical Innovator’ in Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W. W., and Felgentreu, F. (eds.) Terentius Poeta. Munich: 93–109.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2008) ‘When Did the Tibicen Play? Meter and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 138: 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2016) ‘The Meters of Roman Comedy’, Washington University in St. Louis Libraries: http://romancomedy.wulib.wustl.edu/
Mordden, E. (2007) All That Glittered: The Golden Age of Drama on Broadway, 1919–1959. New York.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosetti Casaretto, F. (2005) ‘Rosvita, l’osceno e la rinascita della commedia’, L’immagine riflessa N. S. 14: 71–85.Google Scholar
Mossé, C. (1983) ‘The “World of the Emporium” in the Private Speeches of Demosthenes’ in Garnsey, P., Hopkins, K. and Whittaker, R. (eds.) Trade in the Ancient Economy. Berkeley: 53–63.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. (1986) ‘Plautus and the Theater of Disguise’, Classical Antiquity 5: 216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A. (1913) ‘Die Schimpfwörter in der römischen Komödie’, Philologus 72: 492–502.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1997) Sprechen und Sprache: dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2013) ‘Terence in Latin Literature from the Second Century BCE to the Second Century CE’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Chichester: 363–79.Google Scholar
Munk Olsen, B. (1982–9) L’étude des auteurs classiques latins aux XIe et XIIe siècles (3 vols). Paris.Google Scholar
Munk Olsen, B. (1996) ‘The Production of Classics in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries’ in Chavannes-Mazel, C. A. and Smith, M. M. (eds.) Medieval Manuscripts of the Latin Classics: Production and Use. Los Altos Hills: 1–17.Google Scholar
Neiiendam, K. (1969) ‘Le théâtre de la Renaissance à Rome (1480 environ à 1530)’, Analecta Romana Instituti Danici 5: 103–97.Google Scholar
Nellhaus, T. (2000) ‘Social Ontology and (Meta)theatricality: Reflexions on Performance and Communication in History’, Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 14: 3–39.Google Scholar
Nervegna, S. (2013) Menander in Antiquity: The Contexts of Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2018) ‘Ehescheidungen bei Plautus’ in H.-G. Nesselrath and J. Platschek (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 53–73.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. (1986) ‘Hrotswitha’s Debt to Terence’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 116: 369–91.Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1962) An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford. (Reprinted (2010) with a foreword, revised bibliography, and glossary of Latin terms by E. Metzger.)Google Scholar
Nicoll, A. (1963) The World of Harlequin: A Critical Study of the Commedia dell’Arte. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicolson, F. W. (1893) ‘The Use of hercle (mehercle), edepol (pol) and ecastor (mecastor) by Plautus and Terence’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 4: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, R. (1997) Plautus: Amphitryon. The Comedy of Asses. The Pot of Gold. The Two Bacchises. The Captives. Repr. London.Google Scholar
Nuñez, S. (1995) ‘Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo’, Florentia Iliberritana 6: 347–66.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998) Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Bryhim, S. (1989) ‘The Originality of Plautus’ Casina’, American Journal of Philology 110: 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, A. (ed.) (1946) Frammenti della commedia greca e del mimo nella Sicilia e nella Magna Grecia (2 vols). Naples.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. (ed.) (2007) Broken Laughter. Select Fragments of Greek Comedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oniga, R. (2002) ‘I modelli dell’Anfitrione di Plauto’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 199–225.Google Scholar
Orgel, S. (1979) ‘Shakespeare and the Kinds of Drama’, Critical Inquiry 6: 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlin, E. M. (1997) Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic. Leiden and Cologne.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. (1994) ‘The Third Deception in Bacchides: Fides and Plautus’ Originality’, American Journal of Philology 115: 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, W. M. (2000) ‘Plautus’ Stichus and the Political Crisis of 200 B.C.’, American Journal of Philology 121: 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packman, Z. (1999) ‘Feminine Role Designations in the Comedies of Plautus’, American Journal of Philology 120.2: 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pailler, J.-M., and Payen, P. (eds.) (2004) Que reste-t-il de l’éducation classique? Relire le Marrou, Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (2005) ‘Non-verbal Behaviour on the Roman Comic Stage’ in Cairns, D. (ed.) Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Swansea: 175–93.Google Scholar
Paoli, U. E. (1943) ‘L’ΕΠΙΚΛΗΡΟΣ attica nella “palliata” romana’, Atene e Roma 11: 19–29. (Reprinted in Paoli (1976) 103–12.)Google Scholar
Paoli, U. E. (1952) ‘La in ius vocatio dans les comédies de Plaute’, Studi Senesi 63: 283–304. (Reprinted in Paoli, (1976) 113–27.)Google Scholar
Paoli, U. E. (1962) Comici latini e diritto attico. Milan. (Reprinted in Paoli, U. E. (1976) 31–78.)Google Scholar
Papadimitriou, M. (1998) Στοιχεία της ομιλούμενης Λατινικής στον Τερέντιο και η χρήση τους στη διαφοροποίηση του λόγου των χαρακτήρων του. Ioannina.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1989/2001) ‘Crucially Funny or Tranio on the Couch: The Servus Callidus and Jokes about Torture’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 119: 233–46. (Reprinted in E. Segal (ed.) (2001) Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus and Terence. Oxford: 127–37.)Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1996) ‘Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-examined’,American Journal of Philology 117: 585–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. (1997) ‘Gods Cruel and Kind: Tragic and Civic Theology’ in Pelling, C. (ed.) Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford: 143–60.Google Scholar
Partsch, J. (1910) ‘Römisches und griechisches Recht in Plautus’ Persa’, Hermes 45: 595–614.Google Scholar
Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., Mittelhaus, K., and Ziegler, K. J. F. (eds.) (1893–1980) Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pennitz, M. (2013) ‘Zum Prozess wegen des Kaufs einer vermeintlichen Sklavin. Plautus’ Rudens als römischrechtliche Quelle?’ in Mauritsch, P. and Ulf, C. (eds.) Kultur(en). Formen des Alltäglichen in der Antike. Festschrift für Ingomar Weiler zum 75. Geburtstag. Graz: 567–84.Google Scholar
Pernard, L. (1900) Le droit romain et le droit grec dans le théatre de Plaute et de Térence. Lyon.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (1989) ‘Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in der Atellane’ in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.) Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom. Tübingen: 137–59.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (1996–7) ‘Die Nachahmung des sermo rusticus auf der Bühne des Plautus und Terenz’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 37.3–4: 199–211.Google Scholar
Petrides, A. K. (2014). ‘Plautus between Greek Comedy and Atellan Farce: Assessments and Reassessments’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 424–43.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (1989) ‘Tradizione misogina e trionfo dell’ intelligenza femminile nella commedia plautina’ in Uglione, R. (ed.) Atti del ii convegno nazionale di studi su La donna nel mondo antico, Torino 18–20 aprile 1988. Turin: 87–103.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (1995) ‘Scene mimiche in Plauto’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 171–83.Google Scholar
Piccaluga, G. (1991) ‘At ego aiio id fieri in Graecia et Carthagini / Et hic… (Plaut. Cas.71 sg.): il linguaggio ‘religioso’ in Plauto’, Rivista storica dell’Antichità 21: 9–22.Google Scholar
Platschek, J. (2018) ‘Die Stipulationen in Plautus’ Pseudolus’ in Nesselrath, H.-G. and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 31–52.Google Scholar
Platter, C. (1993) ‘The Uninvited Guest: Aristophanes in Bakhtin’s “History of Laughter”’, Arethusa 26: 201–16.Google Scholar
Ploen, H. (1882) De copiae verborum differentiis inter varia poesis Romanae antiquioris genera intercedentibus. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece. Matter, Sensation and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prete, S. (1970) Il Codice di Terenzio, Vaticano Latino 3226: saggio critico e riproduzioni del manoscritto. Vatican City.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, F. (1916) Der Kauf mit fremdem Geld: Studien über die Bedeutung der Preiszahlung für den Eigentumserwerb nach griechischem und römischem Recht. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Purves, A. (2011) ‘Homer and the Art of Overtaking’, American Journal of Philology 132: 523–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Questa, C. (1968) Per la storia del testo di Plauto nel rinascimento: I, La recensione di Poggio Bracciolini. Rome.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (1984) Numeri innumeri: ricerche sui cantica e la tradizione manoscritta di Plauto. Rome.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (1985) Parerga Plautina: struttura e tradizione manoscritta delle commedie. Urbino.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (2001) ‘Per un’edizione di Plauto’, Giornate Filologiche ‘Francesco Della Corte’ 2: 61–83.Google Scholar
Radden Keefe, B. (2015) ‘Illustrating the Manuscripts of Terence’ in Turner, A. J. and Torello-Hill, G. (eds.) Terence between Late Antiquity and the Age of Printing. Leiden.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. (2002) ‘Un prologo medievale di Terenzio’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 89–101.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R., and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2010) L’Atellana Letteraria. Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Succivo (CE) 30 ottobre 2009. Urbino.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R., and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2013) L’Atellana Preletteraria. Atti sella seconda giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino.Google Scholar
Rapisarda, C. A. (1987) ‘Il teatro classico nel pensiero cristiano antico’ in de Finis, L. (ed.) Teatro e pubblico nell’antichità. Atti del Convegno Nazionale, Trento – 25/27 Aprile 1986. Trento: 94–113.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1991) ‘Theatrical Life in Republican Rome’ in Millar, F. (ed.) Roman Culture and Society. Collected Papers. Oxford: 468–87. (Originally published in Papers of the British School at Rome 53 (1985) 97–113.)Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1983) ‘Terence’ in Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) Texts and Transmission. A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: 412–20. (Repr. with corr. 1986; repr. 1990.)Google Scholar
Rei, A. (1998) ‘Villains, Wives and Slaves in the Comedies of Plautus’ in Joshel, S. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.) Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations. London: 92–108.Google Scholar
Reich, V. (1933) ‘Sprachliche Characteristik bei Terenz (Studien zum Kommentar des Donat)’, Wiener Studien 51: 72–94.Google Scholar
Reinhardstoettner, K. von (1886) Plautus: Spätere Bearbeitungen plautinischer Lustspiele. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. (2006). Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) (1983) Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N. G. (3rd edn 1991) Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar