Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:43:45.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics: A Response to My Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2022

Karin de Boer
Karin de Boer*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
Email: karin.deboer@kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 139 - 153
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Boer, Karin (2015) ‘The Vicissitudes of Metaphysics in Kant and Early Post-Kantian Philosophy’. Revista Portuguesa de filosofia, 71(2–3), 267–86.10.17990/RPF/2015_71_2_0267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, Karin (2020a) Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics: The Critique of Pure Reason Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108897983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, Karin (2020b) ‘Pure Sensibility as Source of Corruption: Kant’s Notion of Critique in the Inaugural Dissertation and the Critique of Pure Reason’. In McQuillan, Colin and del Rosario Acosta López, Maria (eds), Critique in German Philosophy: From Kant to Critical Theory (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 39–59.Google Scholar
De Boer, Karin (2021) ‘Kant’s Inquiries into a New Touchstone for Metaphysical Truths’. In de Boer, Karin and Prunea-Bretonnet, Tinca (eds), The Experiential Turn in Eighteenth-Century German Philosophy (Abingdon: Routledge), 274–96.10.4324/9780429467493-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Paul (2005) All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Ed. Henry Allison and Peter Heath, trans. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2021) ‘Kant and the Principle of Sufficient Reason’. Review of Metaphysics, 74, 301–30.Google Scholar