Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:38:33.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological potentials and the lower vocal tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2019

Scott R. Moisik ,
Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins  and
John H. Esling
Scott R. Moisik
Affiliation:
Linguistics and Multilingual Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singaporescott.moisik@ntu.edu.sg
Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Victoriaeczh@uvic.ca
John H. Esling
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Victoriaesling@uvic.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines a theoretical approach to speech sound systems based on the notion of phonological potentials: physical ‘pressures’ or biases that give rise to discrete structure and the tendencies associated with this structure that arise from the physical nature of speech sound systems. We apply this approach to a poorly understood area of phonology – phenomena of the lower vocal tract (LVT) – through a schematic that encapsulates the complex interactions among the vocal tract structures responsible for producing LVT sounds. With the framework, we provide an account of a range of LVT phenomena from several languages, illustrating how tonal, phonatory, and vowel qualities interact. Finally, we consider how the idea of phonological potentials extends across various physical domains and might exhibit patterns of alignment across these domains, thereby serving to guide the formation of patterns found in speech sound systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , April 2021 , pp. 1 - 35
Check for updates
Copyright
© International Phonetic Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 1997. Lak phonology. In Kaye, Alan S. (ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa, vol. 2, 973–997. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Apostol, Lian, Perrier, Pascal & Bailly, Gérard. 2004. A model of acoustic interspeaker variability based on the concept of formant-cavity affiliation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115(1), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1994. Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Nikolai A. 1967. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bessell, Nicola J. 1992. Towards a phonetic and phonological typology of post-velar articulation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0086353 (accessed 5 December 2018).Google Scholar
Bin-Muqbil, Musaed S. 2006. Phonetic and phonological aspects of Arabic emphatics and gutturals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://www.scribd.com/document/106874865/Bin-Muqbil-2006-Phonetic-and-Phonological-Aspects-of-Arabic-Emphat (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar
Blake, Susan J. 2000. On the distribution of schwa in Sliammon (Salish): Descriptive and theoretical perspectives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0099657 (accessed 5 December 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bless, Diane M. & Abbs, James H. (eds.). 1983. Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/funphon.pdf (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1995. The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carignan, Christopher, Shosted, Ryan K., Fu, Maojing, Liang, Zhi-Pei & Sutton, Bradley P.. 2015. A real-time MRI investigation of the role of lingual and pharyngeal articulation in the production of the nasal vowel system of French. Journal of Phonetics 50, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977a. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977b. Mountain of tongues: The languages of the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology 6, 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1983. Pharyngeal and laryngeal sounds in Caucasian languages. In Bless, & Abbs, (eds.), 344–350.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 2002. On Rs, rhotacism and paleophony. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(2), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christdas, Prathima. 1988. The phonology and morphology of Tamil. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. Nick. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. Nick & Hume, Elizabeth V.. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Colarusso, John. 1985. Pharyngeals and pharyngealization in Salishan and Wakashan. International Journal of American Linguistics 51(4), 366–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2005. Introduction to Caucasian. Lingua 115(1–2), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2003. A phonetic and phonological description of Ao: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland, north-east India. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 1987. Characterizing tongue root behavior. Ms., MIT. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWpbnxzY290dG1vaXNpa3xneDo1ZmUxNDhjOTcxOGVhMzIz (accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar
Dediu, Dan. 2011. Are languages really independent from genes? If not, what would a genetic bias affecting language diversity look like? Human Biology 83(2), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dediu, Dan & Boer, Bart De (eds.). 2016. Target article with overview, commentaries and response [Special section on debating the effect of environment on language]. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1), 30–87.Google Scholar
Dediu, Dan, Janssen, Rick & Moisik, Scott R.. 2017. Language is not isolated from its wider environment: Vocal tract influences on the evolution of speech and language. Language & Communication 54, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dediu, Dan & Ladd, D. Robert. 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(26), 10944–10949.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques. 1986. On the phonological status of glides, the evidence from Malay. In Anderson, John & Durand, Jacques (eds.), Explorations in Dependency Phonology, 79–107. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Easton, Thomas A. 1972. On the normal use of reflexes. American Scientist 60, 591–599.Google ScholarPubMed
Edmondson, Jerold A. & Esling, John H.. 2006. The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress: Laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A., Esling, John H., Harris, Jimmy G., Li, Shaoni & Lama, Ziwo. 2001. The aryepiglottic folds and voice quality in the Yi and Bai languages: Laryngoscopic case studies. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 31, 83–100.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A., Padayodi, Cécile M., Hassan, Zeki M. & Esling, John H.. 2007. The laryngeal articulator: Source and resonator. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), Saarbrücken, vol. 3, 2065–2068.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 1996. Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 26(2), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H. 1999. The IPA categories “pharyngeal” and “epiglottal”: Laryngoscopic observations of pharyngeal articulations and larynx height. Language and Speech 42(4), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esling, John H. 2005. There are no back vowels: The laryngeal articulator model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50, 13–44.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. & Harris, Jimmy G.. 2003. An expanded taxonomy of states of the glottis. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquin (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Barcelona, vol. 1, 1049–1052.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. & Moisik, Scott R.. 2012. Laryngeal aperture in relation to larynx height change: An analysis using simultaneous laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound. In Gibbon, Dafydd, Hirst, Daniel & Campbell, Nick (eds.), Rhythm, melody and harmony in speech: Studies in honour of Wiktor Jassem, vol. 14/15, 117–127. Poznan´: Polskie Towarzystwo Fonetyczne.Google Scholar
Everett, Caleb. 2013. Evidence for direct geographic influences on linguistic sounds: The case of ejectives. PLoS ONE 8(6), e65275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, Caleb, Blasi, Damián E. & Roberts, Seán G.. 2015. Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(5), 1322–1327.Google Scholar
Ewan, William G. 1979. Laryngeal behaviour in speech (Report of the Phonology Laboratory 3, series editors Jaeger, Jeri, Kawasaki, Haruko & Riordan, Carol). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ewan, William G. & Krones, Robert. 1974. Measuring larynx movement using the thyroumbrometer. Journal of Phonetics 2, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, B. Raymond. 1974. Folding mechanism of the human larynx. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 78(1–6), 124–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, Carol A., Rubin, Philip, Remez, Robert & Turvey, Michael T.. 1980. Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Butterworth, Brian (ed.), Language production, 373–420. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu. 1989. Comments on “On the quantal nature of speech”, by Stevens, K. N.. Journal of Phonetics 17, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu & Kakita, Yuki. 1979. Remarks on quantitative description of lingual articulation. In Lindblom, Björn & Öhman, Sven (eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research, 17–24. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. & Benus, Stefan. 2006. Dynamics of phonological cognition. Cognitive Science 30(5), 905–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaprindashvili, Sh. G. 1966. Fonetika Darginskogo Jazyka [The phonetics of the Dargi language]. Tbilisi: Metsniereba.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan. 2016. Ecologizing dimensionality: Prospects for a modular theory of speech production. Ecological Psychology 28(3), 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Chiu, Chenhao, Flynn, Cormac, Stavness, Ian, Francis, Naomi & Fels, S. Sydney. 2012. Producing whole speech events: Differential facial stiffness across the labial stops. Proceedings of Acoustics 2012 (Hong Kong), Paper 2pSC1, Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Institute of Acoustics (HKIOA), 6 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bryan_Gick/publication/224035553_Producing_whole_speech_events_differential_facial_stiffness_across_the_labial_stops/links/56673b2208ae8905db8ba1a0.pdf (accessed 5 December 2018). [Abstract also appears in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130, 4, Pt. 2: 197. 2012.]Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan & Stavness, Ian. 2013. Modularizing speech. Frontiers in Cognitive Science 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00977.Google ScholarPubMed
Gick, Bryan, Stavness, Ian, Chiu, Chenhao & Fels, S. Sydney. 2011. Categorical variation in lip posture is determined by quantal biomechanical-articulatory relations. Canadian Acoustics 39(3), 178–179.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan & Wilson, Ian. 2006. Excrescent schwa and vowel laxing: Cross-linguistic responses to conflicting articulatory targets. In Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Douglas H. & Best, Catherine T. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology VIII: Varieties of phonological competence, vol. 8, 635–659. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, Theodore, Groves, Gordon W. & Jacobs, Roderick. 1985. Kiribatese. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles. 2008. The phonological enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kathleen Currie, Hume, Elizabeth C., Jaeger, T. Florian & Wedel, Andrew. 2016. The message shapes phonology. Ms., University of British Columbia, University of Canterbury, University of Rochester & University of Arizona. https://www.academia.edu/29087504/The_Message_Shapes_Phonology_updated_version_October_2016 (accessed 5 June 2018).Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1995. Feature geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. MIT Quarterly Progress Report 101, 198–212.Google Scholar
Hallgrímsson, Benedikt, Willmore, Katherine & Hall, Brian K.. 2002. Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 119(S35), 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, Zeki M., Esling, John H., Moisik, Scott R. & Crevier-Buchman, Lise. 2011. Aryepiglottic trilled variants of /ʕ, ħ/ in Iraqi Arabic. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 831–834.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Abad, May. 1989. Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua 77, 331–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Katrina M. & Hayward, Richard J.. 1989. ‘Guttural’: Arguments for a new distinctive feature. Transactions of the Philological Society 87(2), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzallah, Rukayyah S. 1990. Aspects of Palestinian Arabic phonology: A non-linear approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. http://conf.ling.cornell.edu/plab/paper/wpcpl4.pdf (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry. 2007. The ‘tight approximant’ variant of the Arabic ‘ayn. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Susan A. 1998. Pharyngeal articulations. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. http://phonetics.linguistics.ucla.edu/research/Hess_diss.pdf (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar
Hirano, Minoru & Ohala, John J.. 1969. Use of hooked-wire electrodes for electromyography of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 12(2), 362–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoberman, Robert D. 1985. The phonology of pharyngeals and pharyngealization in pre-modern Aramaic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105(2), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J. & Ewan, William G.. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/412518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honda, Kiyoshi. 1995. Laryngeal and extra-laryngeal mechanisms of f0 control. In Bell-Berti, Fredericka & Raphael, Lawrence J. (eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues. For Katherine Safford Harris, 215–232. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.Google Scholar
Honda, Kiyoshi. 1996. Organization of tongue articulation for vowels. Journal of Phonetics 24(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honda, Kiyoshi & Fujimura, Osamu. 1991. Intrinsic vowel f0 and phrase-final f0 lowering: Phonological vs. biological explanations. In Gauffin, Jan & Hammerberg, Britta (eds.), Vocal fold physiology, 149–157. San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Honda, Kiyoshi, Hirai, Hiroyuki, Masaki, Shinobu & Shimada, Yasuhiro. 1999. Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in f0 control. Language and Speech 42(4), 401–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoole, Phil & Honda, Kiyoshi. 2011. Automaticity vs. feature-enhancement in the control of segmental f0. In Clements, G. Nick & Ridouane, Rachid (eds.), Where do phonological features come from? Cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categories, 131–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoole, Phil & Kroos, Christian. 1998. Control of larynx height in vowel production. In Mannell, Robert & Robert-Ribes, Jordi (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, vol. 2, 531–534. Sydney: ASSTA. http://www.mirlab.org/conference_papers/International_Conference/ICSLP%201998/PDF/AUTHOR/SL981097.PDF (accessed 5 June 2018).Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. & Testelets, Yakov G.. 2004. Bezhta. In Job, Michael (ed.), The North East Caucasian languages: Part 1, vol. 3, 217–295. Ann Arbor, MI: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Kröger, Bernd J., Hoole, Phil, Sader, Robert, Geng, Christian, Pompino-Marschall, Bernd & Neuschaefer-Rube, Christiane. 2004. MRT-Sequenzen als Datenbasis eines visuellen Artikulationsmodells. HNO 52(9), 837–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1983. The linguistic use of different phonation types. In Bless, & Abbs, (eds.), 351–360.Google Scholar
Lancia, Leonardo & Grawunder, Sven. 2014. Tongue–larynx interactions in the production of word initial laryngealization over different prosodic contexts: A repeated speech experiment. In Fuchs, Susanne, Grice, Martine, Hermes, Anne, Lancia, Leonardo & Mücke, Doris (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP), 245–248. Cologne: ISSP. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leonardo_Lancia/publication/261600480_Tongue-larynx_interactions_in_the_production_of_word_initial_laryngealization_over_different_prosodic_contexts_a_repeated_speech_experiment/links/0deec534f97317dca5000000.pdf(accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1980. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona. 1975. Features for vowels. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 30, 1–55. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7gv6z0vq (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar
Lindqvist-Gauffin, Jan. 1972. A descriptive model of laryngeal articulation in speech. Quarterly Progress and Status Report, Speech Transmission Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology 13(2–3), 1–9. http://www.speech.kth.se/prod/publications/files/qpsr/1972/1972_13_2-3_001-009.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders, Baer, Thomas, McGarr, Nancy S. & Story, Robin S.. 1989. The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85(3), 1314–1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombardi, Linda. 2002. Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19(2), 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Huan & Poeppel, David. 2012. Cortical oscillations in auditory perception and speech: Evidence for two temporal windows in human auditory cortex. Frontiers in Psychology 3.170, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00170x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1), e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddieson, Ian, Rajabov, Ramazan & Sonnenschein, Aaron. 1996. The main features of Tsez phonetics. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 93, 94–110. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/84j8713p#page-97 (accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Keating, Patricia (ed.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda L. 2007. Guttural vowels and guttural co-articulation in Ju|’hoansi. Journal of Phonetics 35(1), 56–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Amanda L., Brugman, Johanna, Sands, Bonny, Namaseb, Levi, Exter, Mats & Collins, Chris. 2009. Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among N|uu clicks. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39(2), 129–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of gutturals: A case study from Ju|’hoansi (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moisik, Scott R. 2013. The epilarynx in speech. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/4690?show=full(accessed 5 December 2018).Google Scholar
Moisik, Scott R., Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa & Esling, John H.. 2012. The epilaryngeal articulator: A new conceptual tool for understanding lingual–laryngeal contrasts. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22, 1–14.Google Scholar
Moisik, Scott R. & Esling, John H.. 2011. The ‘whole larynx’ approach to laryngeal features. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 1406–1409.Google Scholar
Moisik, Scott R. & Esling, John H.. 2014. Modeling the biomechanical influence of epilaryngeal stricture on the vocal folds: A low-dimensional model of vocal–ventricular fold coupling. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 57(2), S687–S704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moisik, Scott R., Esling, John H. & Crevier-Buchman, Lise. 2010. A high-speed laryngoscopic investigation of aryepiglottic trilling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(3), 1548–1558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moisik, Scott R. & Gick, Bryan. 2017. The quantal larynx: The stable regions of laryngeal biomechanics and implications for speech production. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 60(2), 540–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moisik, Scott R., Lin, Hua & Esling, John H.. 2014. A study of laryngeal gestures in Mandarin citation tones using simultaneous laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound (SLLUS). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(2), 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montler, Timothy. 1998. The major processes affecting Klallam vowels. In Bates, Dawn (ed.), Papers for the 33rd International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, 366–373. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Moran, Steven, McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard. 2014. PHOIBLE Online. http://phoible.org/.Google Scholar
Morley, Rebecca L. 2013. Implications of an exemplar-theoretic model of phoneme genesis: A velar palatalization case study. Language and Speech 57(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
Mudzingwa, Calisto. 2010. Shona morphophonemics: Repair strategies in Karanga and Zezuru. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0069014 (accessed 5 December 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Sanders, Nathan & Wright, Rebecca. 2014. On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2), 424–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazari, Mohammad Ali, Perrier, Pascal, Chabanas, Matthieu & Payan, Yohan. 2011. Shaping by stiffening: A modeling study for lips. Motor Control 15(1), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, John J. 2005. Phonetic explanations for sound patterns. In Hardcastle, William J. & Mackenzie Beck, Janet (eds.), A figure of speech: A Festschrift for John Laver, 23–38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 2011. Accommodation to the aerodynamic voicing constraint and its phonological relevance. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII) Hong Kong, 64–67 .Google Scholar
Onn, Farid M. 1976. Aspects of Malay phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiti Kebangsaan, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
Painter, Colin. 1986. The laryngeal vestibule and voice quality. Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 243, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, Carole & LaCharité, Darlene. 2001. Guttural deletion in loanwords. Phonology 18(2), 255–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkell, Joseph S. 1969. Physiology of speech production: Results and implication of a quantitative cineradiographic study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perkell, Joseph S. 2012. Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(5), 382–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pompino-Marschall, Bernd & Z˙ygis, Marzena. 2010. Glottal marking of vowel-initial words in German. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 52, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François. 1996. Guttural vowels. In Hudson, Grover (ed.), Essays on Gurage language and culture: Dedicated to Wolf Leslau on the occasion of his 90th birthday, 175–203. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Raz, Shlomo. 1983. Tigre grammar and texts. Malibu, CA: Udena Publications.Google Scholar
Reidenbach, Martina M. 1998. The muscular tissue of the vestibular folds of the larynx. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 255(7), 365–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, Keren. 2011. Consonantal place of articulation. In Oostendorp, Marc van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth V. & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 1, 519–549. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Riordan, Carol J. 1977. Control of vocal-tract length in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62(4), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Phil. 1989. Phonetics and phonology of yang tone phonation types in Zhenhai. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 18, 229–245.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon. 1996. Variable laryngeals and vowel lowering. Phonology 13(1), 73–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1975. Patterning of nasal vowels. In Ferguson, Charles A., Hyman, Larry M. & Ohala, John J. (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, 333–351. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Boë, Louis-Jean, Vallée, Nathalie & Abry, Christian. 1997. The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics 25(3), 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2002. Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics 30(4), 655–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1987. Locality conditions and feature geometry. In McDonough, Joyce & Plunkett, Bernadette (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 17, 595–618. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1972. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In David, Edward E. Jr. & Denes, Peter B. (eds.), Human communication: A unified view, 51–66. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17, 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2010. Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap. Journal of Phonetics 38(1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylak-Glassman, John C. 2014. An emergent approach to the guttural natural class. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, vol. 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
Takano, Sayoko & Honda, Kiyoshi. 2007. An MRI analysis of the extrinsic tongue muscles during vowel production. Speech Communication 49(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C., Thompson, M. Terry & Efrat, Barbara S.. 1974. Some phonological developments in Straits Salish. International Journal of American Linguistics 40(3), 182-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traill, Anthony. 1986. The laryngeal sphincter as a phonatory mechanism in !Xóõ Bushman. In Singer, Ronald & Lundy, John K. (eds.), Variation, culture and evolution in African populations: Papers in honour of Dr. Hertha de Villiers, 123–131. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Trigo, Loren. 1991. On pharynx-larynx interactions. Phonology 8(1), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Watson, Ben C. 1998. Fundamental frequency during phonetically governed devoicing in normal young and aged speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103(6), 3642–3647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew. 2011. Self-organization in phonology. In Oostendorp, Marc van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth V. & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 1, 130–147. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H., Gick, Bryan, Kumada, Masanobu & Honda, Kiyoshi. 1998. Cricothyroid activity in high and low vowels: Exploring the automaticity of intrinsic f0. Journal of Phonetics 27, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2014. Spoken language achieves robustness and evolvability by exploiting degeneracy and neutrality: Prospects & overviews. BioEssays 36(10), 960–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Sidney. 1979. A radiographic analysis of constriction location for vowels. Journal of Phonetics 7, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Sidney. 1986. The acoustical significance of tongue, lip, and larynx maneuvers in rounded palatal vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80(2), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeroual, Chakir, Esling, John H. & Hoole, Phil. 2011. EMA, endoscopic, ultrasound and acoustic study of two secondary articulations in Moroccan Arabic: Labial-velarization vs. emphasis. In Majeed Hassan, Zeki & Heselwood, Barry (eds.), Instrumental studies in Arabic phonetics, 277–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar