Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:19:40.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whither the Political Science Major? Curricular Design and Program Learning Outcomes at 110 US Colleges and Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Maureen Feeley Open the ORCID record for Maureen Feeley [Opens in a new window]  and
Renée Van Vechten Open the ORCID record for Renée Van Vechten [Opens in a new window]
Maureen Feeley
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Renée Van Vechten
Affiliation:
University of Redlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rethinking the Undergraduate Political Science Major
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 363 - 367
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergbower, Matthew L. 2017. “When Are Students Ready for Research Methods? A Curriculum Mapping Argument for the Political Science Major.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2): 200–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuning, Marijke, Parker, Paul, and Ishiyama, John T.. 2001. “The Last Laugh: Skill Building Through a Liberal Arts Curriculum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (3): 57–61.Google Scholar
Center for Postsecondary Research. 2019. “The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: 2018 Update, Facts and Figures (Revision 7).” Bloomington: Indiana University School of Higher Education. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/downloads/CCIHE2018-FactsFigures.pdf.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle D., Hamann, Kerstin, and Ishiyama, John (eds.). 2009. Assessment in Political Science. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Feeley, Maureen, and Van Vechten, Renée. 2019.“Whither the Political Science Major? A Cross-Institutional Analysis of Curricular Design and Program Learning Outcomes at 110 Colleges and Universities.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 30.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Robert A., McGuire, Jack, and Danforth, Tara L.. 2019. (Online). “Improving Student Success in the Capstone Seminar: The Importance of a Prior Research-Intensive Experience.” Journal of Political Science Education. DOI:10.1080/15512169.2019.1608831.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2005a. “Examining the Impact of the Wahlke Report: Surveying the Structure of the Political Science Curriculum at Liberal Arts Colleges and Universities in the Midwest.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (1): 71–75.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2005b. “The Structure of an Undergraduate Major and Student Learning: A Cross-Institutional Study of Political Science Programs at Thirty-Two Colleges and Universities.” Social Science Journal 42 (3): 359–66.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2009. “Comparing Learning Assessment Plans in Political Science.” In Assessment in Political Science, eds. Deardorff, Michelle D., Hamann, Kerstin, and Ishiyama, John, 61–75. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John, and Breuning, Marijke. 2008. “Assessing Assessment: Examining the Assessment Plans at 50 Political Science Departments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 167–70.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John, Breuning, Marijke, and Lopez, Linda. 2006. “A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John, and Hartlaub, Stephen. 2003. “Sequential or Flexible? The Impact of Differently Structured Political Science Majors on the Development of Student Reasoning.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (1): 83–86.Google Scholar
Kelly, Marisa, and Klunk, Brian E.. 2003. “Learning Assessment in Political Science Departments: Survey Results.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (3): 451–55.Google Scholar
Kuh, George D., and Ikenberry, Stanley O.. 2018. NILOA at Ten: A Retrospective. Urbana: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.Google Scholar
McClellan, E. Fletcher. 2015. “Best Practices in the American Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum.” In Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, eds. Ishiyama, John, Miller, William J., and Simon, Eszter, 3–15. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
US News & World Report . 2019. “US News Best Colleges.” US News & World Report Rankings. Accessed August 25, 2019. www.usnews.com/best-colleges.Google Scholar
VanVechten, Renee. 2021. “Whither the Political Science Major? A Cross-Institutional Analysis of Curricular Design and Program Learning Outcomes at 110 Colleges and Universities.” Harvard Dataverse. DOI:10.7910/DVN/7HRZOW.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C. 1991. “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (1): 48–60.Google Scholar
Young, Candace C., Cartwright, Debra K., and Rudy, Michael. 2014. “To Resist, Acquiesce, or Internalize: Department Responsiveness to Demands for Outcomes Assessment.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Feeley and Van Vechten Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7HRZOW
Link