Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:04:23.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telehealth to Address Health Disparities: Potential, Pitfalls, and Paths Ahead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2021

David A. Simon  and
Carmel Shachar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Telehealth has the potential to address health disparities, but not without deliberate choices about how to implement it. To support vulnerable patients, health policy leaders must pursue creative solutions such as public-private partnerships, broadband infrastructure, and value-based payment. Without these initiatives or others like them, health disparities are likely to persist despite telehealth’s tantalizing potential.

Keywords

TelehealthEquityAccessPayment ModelsPandemic
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 49 , Issue 3: Malingering & Health Policy , Fall 2021 , pp. 415 - 417
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, et al., “Beyond COVID-19: The State of Telehealth Equity and Best Practices in Underserved Populations,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 49, no. 3 (2021): 628–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darrat, I., Tam, S., Boulis, M., and Williams, A.M., “Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Use of Telehealth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surge,” JAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery 43, no. 3 (2021): 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardasani, M., “Thompson P. Senior Centers: Innovative and Emerging Models,” Journal of Applied Gerontology 31, no. 1 (2012): 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slightam, C., Gregory, A.J., Hu, J. et al., “Patient Perceptions of Video Visits Using Veterans Affairs Telehealth Tablets: Survey Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, no. 4 (2020): e15682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, V.R.A., Erickson, L.D., Dailey, N.K. et al., “Attitudes Toward Telemedicine in Urban, Rural, and Highly Rural Communities,” Telemedicine and e-Health 21, n. 8 (2015): 644–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, M.A., Coffman, M., Jetty, A., Petterson, S., and Bazemore, A., “Only 15% of FPs Report Using Telehealth; Training and Lack of Reimbursement Are Top Barriers,” American Family Physician 93, no. 2 (2016): 101.Google ScholarPubMed
Ashwood, J.S., Mehrotra, A., Cowling, D., and Uscher-Pines, L., “Direct-to-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access to Care But Not Decrease Spending,” Health Affairs 36, no. 3 (2017): 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85 Federal Register 84472, 84502-84509, Dec. 28, 2020.Google Scholar
Myers, G., Price, G., and Pykosz, M., “A Report from the Covid Front Lines of Value-Based Primary Care,” New England Journal of Medicine: Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery, available at < https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0148 > (last visited August 20, 2021.) +(last+visited+August+20,+2021.)>Google Scholar