Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:50:47.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Democratic Deficit in U.S. Education Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2021

VLADIMIR KOGAN Open the ORCID record for VLADIMIR KOGAN [Opens in a new window] ,
STÉPHANE LAVERTU Open the ORCID record for STÉPHANE LAVERTU [Opens in a new window]  and
ZACHARY PESKOWITZ Open the ORCID record for ZACHARY PESKOWITZ [Opens in a new window]
VLADIMIR KOGAN*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
STÉPHANE LAVERTU*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
ZACHARY PESKOWITZ*
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Vladimir Kogan, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Ohio State University, kogan.18@osu.edu.
Stéphane Lavertu, Professor, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, Ohio State University, lavertu.1@osu.edu.
Zachary Peskowitz, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Emory University, zachary.f.peskowitz@emory.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political scientists have largely overlooked the democratic challenges inherent in the governance of U.S. public education—despite profound implications for educational delivery and, ultimately, social mobility and economic growth. In this study, we consider whether the interests of adult voters who elect local school boards are likely to be aligned with the needs of the students their districts educate. Specifically, we compare voters and students in four states on several policy-relevant dimensions. Using official voter turnout records and rich microtargeting data, we document considerable demographic differences between voters who participate in school board elections and the students attending the schools that boards oversee. These gaps are most pronounced in majority nonwhite jurisdictions and school districts with the largest racial achievement gaps. Our novel analysis provides important context for understanding the political pressures facing school boards and their likely role in perpetuating educational and, ultimately, societal inequality.

Type
Letter
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 1082 - 1089
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors are listed in alphabetical order. Please direct communications to the corresponding author, Vladimir Kogan.

References

REFERENCES

Auditor of the State of California. 2019. K-12 Local Control Funding. http://www.auditor.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2019-101.pdf.Google Scholar
Bartanen, Brendan, Grissom, Jason A., Joshi, Ela, and Meredith, Marc. 2018. “Mapping Inequalities in Local Political Representation: Evidence from Ohio School Boards.” AERA Open 4 (4): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Eric J., and Johnson, Erik B.. 2016. “Intergenerational Conflict and the Political Economy of Higher Education.” Journal of Urban Economics 91: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Legislative Analyst’s Office. 2018. “Overview of Local Control Funding Formula.” https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2018/Overview-LCFF-041018.pdf.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj, and Hendren, Nathaniel. 2018. “The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility II: County-Level Estimates.” Journal of Public Economics 133 (3): 1163–1228.Google Scholar
Chubb, John E., and Moe, Terry M.. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Danzberger, Jacqueline P. 1992. School Boards: A Troubled American Institution. In Facing the Challenge: The Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on School Governance. New York: The Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Fischel, William A. 2005. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick, and Hartney, Michael T.. 2017. “Racial Inequality in Democratic Accountability: Evidence from Retrospective Voting in Local Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 684–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2015. The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Frederick M., and Meeks, Olivia. 2010. School Boards Circa 2010: Governance in the Accountability Era. Washington, DC: National School Boards Association, Thomas B. Fordham Institute and Iowa School Boards Foundation.Google Scholar
Hill, Carolyn J., Bloom, Howard S., Black, Alison Rebeck, and Lipsey, Mark W.. 2008. “Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research.” Child Development Perspectives 2 (3): 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, and Khanna, Kabir. 2016. “Improving Ecological Inference by Predicting Individual Ethnicity from Voter Registration Records.” Political Analysis 24 (2): 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Rucker C., and Tanner, Sean. 2018. “Money and Freedom: The Impact Of California’s School Finance Reform On Academic Achievement and the Composition Of District Spending.” Getting Down to Facts II, Technical Report.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kogan, Vladimir, Lavertu, Stéphane, and Peskowitz, Zachary. 2018. “Election Timing, Electorate Composition, and Policy Outcomes: Evidence from School Districts.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, Vladimir, Lavertu, Stéphane, and Peskowitz, Zachary. 2021. “Replication Data for: The Democratic Deficit in U.S. Education Governance.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/H1HRYV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, Sean F., Ho, Andrew D.., Shear, Benjamin R., Fahle, Erin M., Kalogrides, Demetra, and DiSalvo, Richard. 2017. Stanford Education Data Archive [computer file]. Version 2.0. http://purl.stanford.edu/db586ns4974.Google Scholar
Reardon, Sean F., Kalogrides, Demetra, and Shores, Kenneth. 2019. “The Geography of Racial/Ethnic Test Score Gaps.” American Journal of Sociology 124 (4): 1164–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, Sean F., Yun, John T., and Eitle, Tamela McNulty. 2000. “The Changing Structure of School Segregation: Measurement and Evidence of Multiracial Metropolitan-area School Segregation, 1989–1995.” Demography 37 (3): 351–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, Meredith P. 2014. “The Gerrymandering of School Attendance Zones and the Segregation of Public Schools: A Geospatial Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (6): 1119–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberstein, Katie, and Roza, Marguerite. 2020. “California’s Local Control Funding Formula: An Examination of Equity.” Edunomics Lab, Georgetown University. Working paper.Google Scholar
Tyack, David B. 1974. The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kogan et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/H1HRYV
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Kogan et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Kogan et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 306.6 KB