Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 9 - Translating Postcolonial Affect

  • from I - Origins
  • Edited by Alex Houen, University of Cambridge
  • Book:
    Affect and Literature
    Published online:
    16 January 2020
    Print publication:
    06 February 2020, pp 175-189

  • Summary

    Affect Studies are arguably still dominated by Eurocentric assumptions and categories. There is a tendency to universalize the emotions rather than pay attention to translating across differing cultural contexts and languages. To what degree do we need to take into account other taxonomies of affect informed by other languages and cultures as providing alternative grammars of the emotions (linked, for example to aesthetics) that are quite separate from the prevailing European concepts dominated by psychology and psychoanalysis? Like the ‘psy’ disciplines from which they derive, Affect Studies are too often dependent on universalist and ahistorical conceptual categories. The chapter examines Han Kang’s The Vegetarian (recent Man-Booker winner) to ask questions concerning the translatability of affect. Is it useful, for example, to invoke the Korean concept of ‘han’ as an interpretive lens for considering Kang’s text or does this land us inevitably in cultural essentialism? As we open up our concepts to the world, translation will be an unavoidable foundational element.