Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - Vassals without Feudalism in Carolingian Italy

  • from Section II - Organizing Italy
  • Edited by Clemens Gantner, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Walter Pohl, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien
  • Book:
    After Charlemagne
    Published online:
    03 December 2020
    Print publication:
    17 December 2020, pp 94-115

  • Summary

    How does one study the Carolingian vassals after the renewal of historiographic paradigms following the publication of Susan Reynolds' Fiefs and Vassalls? In this chapter, I tried to answer this question. It focusses on the reconstruction of the meaning given to the term vassus in the so-called Italic capitularies; the latter, although they certainly cannot be considered a homogenous genre, do, nevertheless, share a specific and coherent political vocabulary. Carolingian vassalage–whether Italian or not – is thus clearly far from being a ‘conceptual black hole’, but nor was it merely a bulwark against the dissolution of the state, as hypothesized by Ganshof. Vassalage was, in fact, a very flexible instrument, which could be adopted by the government in newly conquered territories in relation to ‘agents’ who supported the king/emperor, the counts and the bishops in their functions. It could also be adopted by individual ‘magnates’ for services related to their own domus. Therefore in Italy, as elsewhere, two models of vassalages emerged. This flexibility was the reason for the success of vassalage in Carolingian Italy.