We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter introduces the development of individual dignity in Japan. First, it notes that the idea of individual dignity in the Japanese Constitution is affected by the US Constitution through the enactment process. However, there are still some social constraints on individualism in the law. Next, I scrutinize two factors of individual dignity in light of the hybrid approach in academic discussion. The Japanese Constitution has been affected not only by the US Constitution but also the Prussian Constitution. As a result, it contains both the individualism of the US Constitution and the human personality of the German Basic Law. Finally, I shed light on individual dignity in Japan by reviewing constitutional case law. Although the Supreme Court indicated both factors of individual dignity, for most of the time after WWII the Court upheld the laws that constrained individualism. Recently, the Court tends to hold unconstitutional the old laws that constrain individual dignity by looking to social change. This reorientation of the Court regards society as supporting individualism. Society plays the role of a catalyst toward progress in individual dignity.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.