To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure email@example.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Institutional theories examine shared understandings or ways of doing things which can become engrained over time, developing into interpretative patterns within decision-making frameworks. Similarly, certain concepts within law can become imbued within a body of past practice, which can make legal change difficult to achieve. In some cases, even when legal change is suggested, practice within a field may be drawn back to historical institutional understandings. This chapter focuses on the European Patent Office (EPO)’s approach to interpreting morality provisions for biotechnological inventions, to highlight how traditional conceptions of the limited role of ethics within patent law have become engrained in EPO practice. Even though biotechnologies have advanced, and their patentability poses heightened ethical concerns, the interpretative communities within patent law have remained static. Thus, engrained institutional understandings of the limited role of ethics within patent law continue to dominate. This can encumber decision-making and, especially in areas of rapid technological and societal change, weaken the law’s responsiveness, which warrants much greater examination.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.