Following a terrorist attack, responses to a psychosocial disaster range from low-intensity initiatives to high-intensity treatment. Some studies described post-disaster psychosocial services and planning across Europe. However, little is known about the psychosocial support (PS) actually delivered after terrorist attacks.

This study assesses prevalence and the factors associated with not receiving short-term PS among terror-exposed people with probable mental health disorders following the January 2015 terrorist attacks in France.

This study used data from the first wave of a longitudinal survey conducted six months after the attacks. Prevalence and factors associated with not receiving PS were described in the immediate period (48 hours), the early post-immediate period (48 hours-one week), and the medium-term (over one week) using a robust Poisson regression for each of the three periods.

Nearly one-half of the participants (N = 189) did not receive PS in any period (46.6% in the immediate period, 45.5% in the early post-immediate period, and 54.5% in the medium-term). In each period, not receiving PS was associated with not being very close to the attack sites. Not receiving PS in the immediate period was also associated with being a direct witness (DW) rather than being directly threatened (DT) and not having support in daily life; in the early post-immediate period, not receiving PS was associated with not having a peri-traumatic dissociation experience and being followed for a psychological problem before the attacks; and in the medium-term period, it was associated with perceived social isolation.

The characteristics of the terror exposure and social support seemed to influence presence or absence of PS after the terrorist attack and highlight the need for strategies to reach out to people regardless of the type of exposure.

In the French mainland administrative region Nouvelle-Aquitaine, syndromic surveillance is based on hospital emergency data, mortality data, and data from associations belonging to the SOS Médecins network. The aim of the present article is to describe the functioning of this network and to illustrate its use for syndromic surveillance in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.

The SOS Médecins network participates in the syndromic surveillance system SurSaUD, developed by Santé publique France (SpF; the French National Public Health Agency; Saint-Maurice, Paris, France). Near real-time data are automatically transmitted daily to a data server and analyzed by SpF’s Nouvelle Aquitaine’s regional unit to identify, monitor, and evaluate the impact of expected and unexpected health events in the region.

The SOS Médecins network has five local associations spread across the region with 146 participating physicians. Data have been recorded for more than 10 years and represented nearly 481,000 visits in 2017. The resulting database has helped to identify and monitor seasonal epidemics and unexpected events, as well as measure the health impact of these events.

The data from the SOS Médecins network are an essential source in syndromic surveillance. They complement surveillance data from other sources. More specifically, mortality and emergency unit traffic reflect the most severe cases, while SOS Médecins data help early detection of epidemics and health events in the general population. The network has shown its responsiveness and its reliability, not only for the surveillance of seasonal epidemics, but also for the detection of unusual signals. It therefore constitutes an essential link in syndromic surveillance in France, and specifically in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region.

Terrorist attacks occurred in Paris in January 2015.

To assess the mental health impact and the access to psychomedical care of people exposed to the attacks.

We implemented an open-cohort design 6 and 18 months after the attacks. Exposed civilians and rescue workers were included according to the exposure criteria A for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in DSM-5. A face-to-face questionnaire conducted by trained psychologists was used to collect sociodemographic characteristics, exposure level, scores on psychometric scales, an international neuropsychiatric interview and access to care.

Six months after the attacks, 18% of civilians reported symptoms of PTSD, 31% had anxiety disorders and 11% depression. Among rescue workers, 3% reported symptoms of PTSD and 14% anxiety disorders. During the 48 h following the attacks, 53.2% of civilian had access to psychomedical care v. 35% of rescue and police staff.

We found severe psychological consequences, even in people who were less exposed.

None.