To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We longitudinally observed and assessed the impact of the operating room (OR) staff movements and door openings on surrogates of the exogenous infectious risk using a new technology system.
Design and setting:
This multicenter observational study included 13 ORs from 10 hospitals, performing planned cardiac and orthopedic surgery (total hip or knee replacement). Door openings during the surgical procedure were obtained from data collected by inertial sensors fixed on the doors. Intraoperative staff movements were captured by a network of 8 infrared cameras. For each surgical procedure, 3 microbiological air counts, longitudinal particles counts, and 1 bacteriological sample of the wound before skin closure were performed. Statistics were performed using a linear mixed model for longitudinal data.
We included 34 orthopedic and 25 cardiac procedures. The median frequency of door openings from incision to closure was independently associated with an increased log10 0.3 µm particle (ß, 0.03; standard deviation [SD], 0.01; P = .01) and air microbial count (ß, 0.07; SD, 0.03; P = .03) but was not significantly correlated with the wound contamination before closure (r = 0.13; P = .32). The number of persons (ß, −0.08; SD, 0.03; P < .01), and the cumulated movements by the surgical team (ß, 0.0004; SD, 0.0005; P < .01) were associated with log10 0.3 µm particle counts.
This study has demonstrated a previously missing association between intraoperative staff movements and surrogates of the exogenous risk of surgical site infection. Restriction of staff movements and door openings should be considered for the control of the intraoperative exogenous infectious risk.
Computer-Assisted Learning Systems (CALSs) have the potential to transform learning by supporting and augmenting students’ ability to accurately monitor and regulate key cognitive, affective, metacognitive, motivational and social processes. Recent advances in the cognitive, learning, computational, and engineering sciences make is possible to significantly augment existing CALSs both as research tools (e.g., examine temporally unfolding self-regulatory processes) as well as instructional tools (e.g., foster metacognitive skills). The goal of this chapter is to present research on self-regulation in CALSs by providing examples from contemporary systems and also how we use multimodal multichannel data (e.g., log files, eye tracking, facial expressions of emotions, physiological sensors, concurrent verbalizations) to examine cognitive, affective, and metacognitive (CAM) self-regulatory processes in these systems. As such, we first provide a brief history of research in SRL with CALSs and discuss how different CALSs have been used to study and foster SRL. We will then present and discuss conceptual and theoretical issues derived from several models, frameworks, and theories of SRL that focus on CAM processes. Following this, we discuss several dichotomies related to CAM and the challenges they pose for the measurement and support of SRL with CALSs. Lastly, we present challenges and future directions that need to be addressed by interdisciplinary researchers to advance the field of SRL and CALSs.
The collaboration principle in multimedia learning, which consists of three related sub-principles, determines when and under what conditions collaboration will positively affect learning in a multimedia environment. Flashmeeting is an example of multimedia collaborative environment that allows for tasks of various complexities to be carried out (Principle 1) and stimulates groups cognitive processes (Principle 2) by providing tools for real-time group work (with synchronous sound, pictures, text, etc.), a repository for sharing documents, and even recording facilities for the meeting, making information available to all participants asynchronously after the meeting has taken place (Principle 3). Collaboration in multimedia learning is effective when the distribution of tasks is such that the cognitive processes involved in carrying out the tasks and the products of those processes are complementary and/or supplementary. The collaborative principles in multimedia learning rest for a large part on hypotheses and assumptions about cognitive load.
The allure of personal epistemology research is the implicit assumption that in some cases students’ poor academic performance may not be due to any deficiency in skill or ability, but rather due to their naïve beliefs about knowledge and knowing (Hofer and Pintrich, 1997). Numerous researchers have asserted that naïve or less sophisticated beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing may cause students to memorize facts rather than construct conceptual knowledge, poorly monitor and regulate their learning, exert little effort, and neglect essential thinking skills (Hofer, 2002, 2004a, 2004 b). These students act as mere receivers of information (Belenky et al., 1986) and not active constructors of knowledge who appropriately question authority figures or other sources of knowledge (Baxter Magolda, 2004; King and Kitchener, 1994; Perry, 1970). However, according to personal epistemology researchers, if these students could be shown that knowledge is complex and dynamic, they would see the need for critical thinking skills to evaluate the justifications for knowledge claims and be able to construct complex and coherent knowledge whose warrants could be both appropriately scrutinized when necessary and utilized in a convincing manner on tests, papers, and other academic assignments (Kuhn and Weinstock, 2002). Such sophistication is often described as a prerequisite for success in higher education (Boyer, 1987; Sullivan and Rosin, 2008). Yet, the research on personal epistemology is not clear whether elementary or secondary school students are likely to have or need such sophisticated beliefs regarding the nature of knowledge and knowing.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.