Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

129 results

Page 1 of 7

  • Cryogenic-electron Microscopy for Battery Materials
  • Yuzhang Li, Robert Sinclair, Yi Cui
  • Journal: Microscopy and Microanalysis / Volume 26 / Issue S2 / August 2020
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2020, pp. 1824-1825
  • Print publication: August 2020
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation
  • 23 - Implications of the Changing Nature of Work for Employee Health and Safety
  • from Part III - Implications for Talent Management and Impact on Employees
  • Edited by Brian J. Hoffman, University of Georgia, Mindy K. Shoss, University of Central Florida, Lauren A. Wegman, University of Georgia
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Changing Nature of Work
  • Published online: 02 April 2020
  • Print publication: 23 April 2020, pp 489-508
  • View extract

    Summary

    Work is among the most important influences on safety, health and wellbeing, both as a threat to health and as a source of resources that support health. However, the nature and pace of changes to the modern workplace present significant challenges to researchers seeking to understand the health implications of these changes, as well as to government and organizational leaders seeking to craft appropriate policy solutions. This chapter has three goals: (1) to provide an overview of occupational health psychology and describe the NIOSH concept of work organization in terms of implications for occupational health, (2) to present the Job Demands–Resources model as a theoretical framework accounting for the effects of work organization on employee health, and (3) describe health implications of several key trends in the nature of work organization including the employment relationships, work schedules, technology, lean production, and safety and wellness interventions.

  • Contributions to High Resolution and In Situ Electron Microscopy
  • Robert Sinclair, Yunzhi Liu, Sangchul Lee, Ai Leen Koh
  • Journal: Microscopy and Microanalysis / Volume 24 / Issue S1 / August 2018
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2018, pp. 10-11
  • Print publication: August 2018
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation
  • Current Emergency Preparedness Resources and Capabilities Among Academic Health Systems in the United States
  • Paul D. Biddinger, David Reisman, Robert F. Seger, Ann L. Prestipino, Julia Sinclair, Barry Wante, Eric Goralnick, Katherine Kemen
  • Journal: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness / Volume 12 / Issue 5 / October 2018
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 February 2018, pp. 574-577
  • Print publication: October 2018
  • View abstract
    Objective

    Although hospital emergency preparedness efforts have been recognized as important, there has been growing pressure on cost containment, as well as consolidation within the US health care system. There is little data looking at what health care emergency preparedness functions have been, could be, or should be centrally coordinated at a system level.

    Methods

    We developed a questionnaire for academic health systems and asked about program funding, resources provided, governance, and activities. The questionnaire also queried managers’ opinions regarding the appropriate role for the system-level resources in emergency response, as well as about what is most helpful at the system-level supporting preparedness.

    Results

    Fifty-two of 97 systems (54%) responded. The most frequently occurring system-wide activities included: creating trainings or exercise templates (75%), promoting preparedness for employees in the system (75%), providing access to specific subject matter experts (73%), and developing specific plans for individual member entities within their system (73%). The top resources provided included a common mass notification system (71%), arranging for centralized contracts for goods and services (71%), and providing subject matter expertise (69%).

    Conclusions

    Currently, there is wide variation in the resources, capabilities, and programs used to support and coordinate system-level emergency preparedness among academic health systems. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:574–577)

  • How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience?
  • Thomas W. Britt, Winny Shen, Robert R. Sinclair, Matthew R. Grossman, David M. Klieger
  • Journal: Industrial and Organizational Psychology / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / June 2016
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016, pp. 378-404
  • Print publication: June 2016
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
  • View abstract

    Past research purporting to study employee resilience suffers from a lack of conceptual clarity about both the resilience construct and the methodological designs that examine resilience without ensuring the occurrence of significant adversity. The overall goal of this article is to address our contemporary understanding of employee resilience and identify pathways for the future advancement of resilience research in the workplace. We first address conceptual definitions of resilience both inside and outside of industrial and organizational psychology and make the case that researchers have generally failed to document the experience of significant adversity when studying resilience in working populations. Next, we discuss methods used to examine resilience, with an emphasis on distinguishing the capacity for resilience and the demonstration of resilience. Representative research is then reviewed by examining self-reports of resilience or resilience-related traits along with research on resilient and nonresilient trajectories following significant adversity. We then briefly address the issues involved in selecting resilient employees and building resilience in employees. The article concludes with recommendations for future research studying resilience in the workplace, including documenting significant adversity among employees, assessing multiple outcomes, using longitudinal designs with theoretically supported time lags, broadening the study of resilience to people in occupations outside the military who may face significant adversity, and addressing the potential dark side of an emphasis on resilience.

Page 1 of 7