Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

24 results

Page 1 of 2

  • 6 - The Temple as Symbol, the Temple as Metaphor: Contrasting Eastern and Western Reimaginings

  • Edited by Robin Griffith-Jones, Eric C. Fernie
  • Book:
    Tomb and Temple
    Published by:
    Boydell & Brewer
    Published online:
    17 January 2023
    Print publication:
    18 May 2018, pp 146-158

  • Summary

    Metaphors are slippery things, at once allusive and elusive. Indeed, metaphors are by their very nature subversive: rather than telling us what something is, they tell us what it is not. Aristotle understood this; as he explains, ‘Metaphor consists in giving the thing a name that belongs to something else.’ Nevertheless, metaphors are a part of the language by which we construct the world as we perceive it. They both form our language and creatively transform it. By contrast, symbols seem more stable, more firmly grounded. A symbol can represent an abstract idea in concrete form, an intellectualized image; usually we can ‘see’ a symbol, whereas we can only imagine a metaphor. In the following short chapter, I shall attempt to come to grips with the rhetoric of architecture, looking at the idea of the Temple of Jerusalem as it was expressed in concrete form in Byzantine architecture. The Temple offers a unique perspective, for it survived more as a concept than as a reality. We can see its medieval replications, whereas we can only imagine its original appearance.

    Historically, texts about buildings range from the purely descriptive to the vacuously allegorical. Both symbolic and metaphorical language has been used to explicate their physical appearance or to provide them with additional meaning. For the architectural historian, the rhetorical tradition may consequently provide both insights and confusions, for a text may be descriptive, symbolic, or metaphorical – or a combination of all three. The difficulty is to determine which is which. Although the language employed is almost never scientific, with both symbols and metaphors, some sort of resemblance is assumed. But does the application of an allegorical language to architecture automatically signal the replication of meaningful forms?

    Symbols and metaphors may be difficult to pin down – both in texts and in buildings. By contrast, although a building may be the passive receptor of applied meanings, its architectural form is fixed and concrete. And although symbols and metaphors may be hard to isolate, their very elusiveness may also be the basis of their power. By definition and etymology, a metaphor transposes or transports its subject. A symbol, on the other hand, represents or associates a subject with something else, something that exists beyond it in time and space.

Architecture of the Sacred
  • Space, Ritual, and Experience from Classical Greece to Byzantium
  • Edited by Bonna D. Wescoat, Robert G. Ousterhout
  • Published online:
    05 March 2012
    Print publication:
    27 February 2012
  • In this book, a distinguished team of authors explores the way space, place, architecture, and ritual interact to construct sacred experience in the historical cultures of the eastern Mediterranean. Essays address fundamental issues and features that enable buildings to perform as spiritually transformative spaces in ancient Greek, Roman, Jewish, early Christian, and Byzantine civilizations. Collectively they demonstrate the multiple ways in which works of architecture and their settings were active agents in the ritual process. Architecture did not merely host events; rather, it magnified and elevated them, interacting with rituals facilitating the construction of ceremony. This book examines comparatively the ways in which ideas and situations generated by the interaction of place, built environment, ritual action, and memory contributed to the cultural formulation of the sacred experience in different religious faiths.

Page 1 of 2