Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context.

A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models.

Between 8/11/2019–12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: n = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: n = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, p value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years.

The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance.

The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.

‘Inhalants’ have been associated with poorer mental health in adolescence, but little is known of associations with specific types of inhalants.

We aimed to investigate associations of using volatile substances, nitrous oxide and alkyl nitrates with mental health problems in adolescence.

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from 13- to 14-year-old adolescents across England and Wales collected between September 2019 and March 2020. Multilevel logistic regression examined associations between lifetime use of volatile substances, nitrous oxide and alkyl nitrates with self-reported symptoms of probable depression, anxiety, conduct disorder and auditory hallucinations.

Of the 6672 adolescents in the study, 5.1% reported use of nitrous oxide, 4.9% volatile solvents and 0.1% alkyl nitrates. After accounting for multiple testing, adolescents who had used volatile solvents were significantly more likely to report probable depressive (odds ratio = 4.59, 95% CI 3.58, 5.88), anxiety (odds ratio = 3.47, 95% CI 2.72, 4.43) or conduct disorder (odds ratio = 7.52, 95% CI 5.80, 9.76) and auditory hallucinations (odds ratio = 5.35, 95% CI 4.00, 7.17) than those who had not. Nitrous oxide use was significantly associated with probable depression and conduct disorder but not anxiety disorder or auditory hallucinations. Alkyl nitrate use was rare and not associated with mental health outcomes. Adjustment for use of other inhalants, tobacco and alcohol resulted in marked attenuation but socioeconomic disadvantage had little effect.

To our knowledge, this study provides the first general population evidence that volatile solvents and nitrous oxide are associated with probable mental health disorders in adolescence. These findings require replication, ideally with prospective designs.

To describe neutropenic fever management practices among healthcare institutions.

Survey.

Members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network (SRN) representing healthcare institutions within the United States.

An electronic survey was distributed to SRN representatives, with questions pertaining to demographics, antimicrobial prophylaxis, supportive care, and neutropenic fever management. The survey was distributed from fall 2022 through spring 2023.

40 complete responses were recorded (54.8% response rate), with respondent institutions accounting for approximately 15.7% of 2021 US hematologic malignancy hospitalizations and 14.9% of 2020 US bone marrow transplantations. Most entities have institutional guidelines for neutropenic fever management (35, 87.5%) and prophylaxis (31, 77.5%), and first-line treatment included IV antipseudomonal antibiotics (35, 87.5% cephalosporin; 5, 12.5% penicillin; 0, 0% carbapenem).

We observed significant heterogeneity in treatment course decisions, with roughly half (18, 45.0%) of respondents continuing antibiotics until neutrophil recovery, while the remainder having criteria for de-escalation prior to neutrophil recovery. Respondents were more willing to de-escalate prior to neutrophil recovery in patients with identified clinical (27, 67.5% with pneumonia) or microbiological (30, 75.0% with bacteremia) sources after dedicated treatment courses.

We found substantial variation in the practice of de-escalation of empiric antibiotics relative to neutrophil recovery, highlighting a need for more robust evidence for and adoption of this practice. No respondents use carbapenems as first-line therapy, comparing favorably to prior survey studies conducted in other countries.

Several factors shape the neurodevelopmental trajectory. A key area of focus in neurodevelopmental research is to estimate the factors that have maximal influence on the brain and can tip the balance from typical to atypical development.

Utilizing a dissimilarity maximization algorithm on the dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) of the resting state functional MRI data, we classified subjects from the cVEDA neurodevelopmental cohort (n = 987, aged 6–23 years) into homogeneously patterned DMD (representing typical development in 809 subjects) and heterogeneously patterned DMD (indicative of atypical development in 178 subjects).

Significant DMD differences were primarily identified in the default mode network (DMN) regions across these groups (p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected). While the groups were comparable in cognitive performance, the atypical group had more frequent exposure to adversities and faced higher abuses (p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected). Upon evaluating brain-behavior correlations, we found that correlation patterns between adversity and DMN dynamic modes exhibited age-dependent variations for atypical subjects, hinting at differential utilization of the DMN due to chronic adversities.

Adversities (particularly abuse) maximally influence the DMN during neurodevelopment and lead to the failure in the development of a coherent DMN system. While DMN's integrity is preserved in typical development, the age-dependent variability in atypically developing individuals is contrasting. The flexibility of DMN might be a compensatory mechanism to protect an individual in an abusive environment. However, such adaptability might deprive the neural system of the faculties of normal functioning and may incur long-term effects on the psyche.

Neurocognitive decline is prevalent in patients with metastatic cancers, attributed to various disease, treatment, and individual factors. Whether the presence of brain metastases (BrMets) contributes to neurocognitive decline is unclear. Aims of this study are to examine neurocognitive performance in BrMets patients and compare findings to patients with advanced metastatic cancer without BrMets. Here, we present baseline findings from an ongoing, prospective longitudinal study.

English-speaking adults with advanced metastatic cancers were recruited from the brain metastases and lung clinics at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Participants completed standardized tests (WTAR, HVLT-R, BVMT-R, COWAT, Trailmaking test, WAIS-IV Digit Span) and questionnaires (FACT-Cog v3, EORTC-QLQ C30 and BN20, PROMIS Depression(8a) and Anxiety(6a)) prior to cranial radiotherapy for those who required it. Test scores were converted to z-scores based on published normative data and averaged to create a composite neurocognitive performance score and domain scores for memory, attention/working memory, processing speed and executive function. Neurocognitive impairment was defined according to International Cancer and Cognition Task Force criteria. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to identify individual, disease and treatment variables that predict cognitive performance.

76 patients (mean (SD) age: 63.2 (11.7) years; 53% male) with BrMets were included. 61% experienced neurocognitive impairment overall; impairment rates varied across domains (38% memory, 39% executive functioning, 13% attention/working memory, 8% processing speed). BrMets quantity, volume, and location were not associated with neurocognitive performance. Better performance status (ECOG; ß[95%CI];-0.38[-0.70,-0.05], p=0.021), higher premorbid IQ (0.34[0.10,0.58], p=0.005) and greater cognitive concerns (0.02[-3.9e-04,0.04], p=0.051) were associated with better neurocognitive performance in univariate analyses. Only premorbid IQ (0.37[0.14,0.60], p=0.003) and cognitive concerns (0.02[0.0004, 0.03], p=0.05) remained significant in multivariate analysis. We also recruited 31 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with no known BrMets (age: 67.5 (8.3); 32% male) and compared them to the subgroup of BrMets patients in our sample with mNSCLC (N=32; age: 67.8 (11.7); 53% male). We found no differences in impairment rates (BrMets/non-BrMets: Cognitive Composite, 59%/55%; Memory, 31%/32%; Executive Functioning, 35%/29%; Attention/working memory, 16%/13%; Processing speed, 7%/6%; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, all p-value’s > 0.5). The presence or absence of BrMets did not predict neurocognitive performance. Among patients with mNSCLC, higher education (0.11[0.03,0.18], p=0.004) and premorbid IQ (0.36[0.12,0.61], p=0.003), fewer days since primary diagnosis (0.00290[-0.0052,-0.0005], p=0.015) fewer pack-years smoking history (0.01[0.02,-0.001], p=0.027) and greater cognitive concerns (0.02[7e-5,0.04], p=0.045) were associated with better neurocognitive performance in univariate analyses; only premorbid IQ (0.26[0.02,0.51], p=0.04) and cognitive concerns (0.02[0.01,0.04], p=0.02) remained significant in multivariate analysis.

Cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with advanced metastatic cancers, particularly affecting memory and executive functioning. However, 39% of patients in our sample were not impaired in any domain. We found no associations between the presence of BrMets and neurocognitive function in patients with advanced cancers prior to cranial radiation. Premorbid IQ, a proxy for cognitive reserve, was associated with cognitive outcomes in our sample. Our longitudinal study will allow us to identify risk and resilience factors associated with neurocognitive changes in patients with metastatic cancers to better inform therapeutic interventions in this population.

In the UK over 12,400 yearly cases of head and neck cancers are reported (2021). Pharyngolaryngeal biopsies (OLB) may improve the speed of diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancers under local anesthetic. The Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) published advice on this technology in 2018. Since this, additional evidence has been published to warrant a health technology assessment (HTA) for Wales. The aim of this review was to provide update on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of OLB when compared to undergoing biopsy in an operating theatre (OTB) under general anesthetic to inform decision making in Wales.

A rapid review was undertaken of relevant databases since 2018 of the clinical evidence, health economics and patient perspectives relevant to Wales. Health Technology Wales (HTW) developed a de-novo cost-utility analysis comparing OLB to OTB over a lifetime horizon. Inputs were sourced from the SHTG budget impact analysis, updated with values more relevant to a Welsh setting.

From consultation to biopsy procedure, the mean number of days was 1.3 for OLB compared to 17.4 days under OTB (p < 0.05). The mean time from consultation to start of treatment was 27 days for OLB compared to 41.5 days for OTB (p < 0.05). The economic analysis found a resulting ICER of GBP21,011 (EUR23,824.23) in a population with 2,183 at risk patients. As OLB was associated with lower costs (GBP816 per person) (EUR925.26) and fewer quality adjusted life years than OTB (-0.04), this ICER corresponds to OLB being considered a cost-effective diagnostic strategy.

HTW guidance was able to recommend use of OLB within the diagnostic pathway for head and neck cancers within Wales. For people with a positive test, OLB is sufficient to confirm a diagnosis but should not be used to rule out a diagnosis due to the potential in reducing the time to diagnosis and treatment in a cost-saving way.

Cannabis has been associated with poorer mental health, but little is known of the effect of synthetic cannabinoids or cannabidiol (often referred to as CBD).

To investigate associations of cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol with mental health in adolescence.

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with 13- to 14-year-old adolescents across England and Wales in 2019–2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the association of lifetime use of cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol with self-reported symptoms of probable depression, anxiety, conduct disorder and auditory hallucinations.

Of the 6672 adolescents who participated, 5.2% reported using of cannabis, 1.9% reported using cannabidiol and 0.6% reported using synthetic cannabinoids. After correction for multiple testing, adolescents who had used these substances were significantly more likely to report a probable depressive, anxiety or conduct disorder, as well as auditory hallucinations, than those who had not. Adjustment for socioeconomic disadvantage had little effect on associations, but weekly tobacco use resulted in marked attenuation of associations. The association of cannabis use with probable anxiety and depressive disorders was weaker in those who reported using cannabidiol than those who did not. There was little evidence of an interaction between synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol.

To our knowledge, this study provides the first general population evidence that synthetic cannabinoids and cannabidiol are associated with probable mental health disorders in adolescence. These associations require replication, ideally with prospective cohorts and stronger study designs.

This analysis examined the impact of a digital therapeutic for treating chronic insomnia (currently marketed as Somryst®, at the time called Sleep Healthy Using The internet [SHUTi]) on healthcare resource use (HCRU) by comparing patients treated with the digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBTi) to patients not treated with dCBTi, but with insomnia medications.

A retrospective observational study using health claims data was conducted in two cohorts across the United States: patients who registered for dCBTi (cases) between June 1, 2016 and October 31, 2018 (index date) vs. patients who did not register for dCBTi but initiated a second prescription for an insomnia medication in the same time period (controls). Observation period was 16–24 months. No other inclusion/exclusion criteria were used. Control patients were matched using a nearest neighbor within-caliper matching without replacement approach. Incidence rates for HCRU encounter type were calculated using a negative binomial model for both cohorts. Costs were estimated by multiplying HCRU by published average costs for each medical resource.

Evaluated were 248 cases (median age 56.5 years, 57.3% female, 52.4% treated with sleep-related medications) and 248 matched controls (median age 55.0 years, 56.0% female, 100.0% treated with sleep-related medications). Over the course of 24 months post-initiation, cases had significantly lower incidences of inpatient stays (55% lower, IRR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28–0.73; P=0.001), significantly fewer emergency department (ED) visits without inpatient admission (59% lower; IRR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.27–0.63; P<0.001), and significantly fewer hospital outpatient visits (36% lower; IRR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49–0.82; P<0.001). There was also a trend for fewer ambulatory surgical center visits (23% lower; IRR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.52–1.14; P=0.197) and fewer office visits (7% lower; IRR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81–1.07; P=0.302) with the use of SHUTi. Use of sleep medications was more than four times greater in controls vs. cases, with 9.6 (95% CI: 7.88–11.76) and 2.4 (95% CI: 1.91–2.95) prescriptions/patient, respectively (P<0.001). All-cause per-patient HCRU costs were $8,202 lower over 24 months for cases vs. controls, driven primarily by a lower incidence of hospitalizations (-$4,996 per patient) and hospital outpatient visits (-$2,003 per patient).

Patients with chronic insomnia who used a digital CBTi treatment had significant and durable real-world reductions in hospital inpatient stays, ED visits, hospital outpatient visits, and office visits compared to matched controls treated with medications.

Pear Therapeutics (US), Inc.

Racial and ethnic minority groups have higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe illness, and death; however, they receive monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment at lower rates than non-Hispanic White patients. We report data from a systematic approach to improve equitable provision of COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment.

Treatment was administered at a community health urgent care clinic affiliated with a safety-net urban hospital. The approach included a stable treatment supply, a same-day test and treat model, a referral process, patient outreach, and financial support. We analyzed the race/ethnicity data descriptively and compared proportions using a chi-square test.

Over 17 months, 2524 patients received treatment. Compared to the demographics of county COVID-19-positive cases, a greater proportion of patients who received mAb treatment were Hispanic (44.7% treatment vs. 36.5% positive cases, p < 0.001), a lower proportion were White Non-Hispanic (40.7% treatment vs. 46.3% positive cases, p < 0.001), equal proportion were Black (8.2% treatment vs. 7.4% positive cases, P = 0.13), and equal proportion occurred for other race patients.

Implementation of multiple systematic strategies to administer COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies resulted in an equitable race/ethnic distribution of treatment.