Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

51 results

Page 1 of 3

  • The More it Changes, the More Hungarian Nationalism Remains the Same

  • Peter F. Sugar
  • Journal:
    Austrian History Yearbook / Volume 31 / January 2000
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 February 2009, pp. 127-155
    Print publication:
    January 2000

  • The literature dealing with Magyar nationalism is extensive. The general impression created by its manifestations during the last roughly two and a half centuries has been that it had been aggressive and disrespectful of the rights of other nations living in the lands of historical Hungary, occasionally even bordering on the criminal. This evaluation did not originate with R. W. Seton-Watson, but was certainly disseminated widely by the works he published under the pen names of Viator and Scotus Viator.2 While some of the judgments passed on Magyar nationalism were exaggerated and even unjustified, the correctness of the general picture cannot be denied. The actions of Hungary's politicians and the views expressed by the country's publicists and literary figures support the negative evaluation of some of the most crucial manifestations of Magyar nationalism. The following pages are presented not in an attempt to excuse the general tone and occasional excesses of Hungarian nationalism, but to try to answer only one question: why did Magyar nationalism take the forms that it did?

  • Donald W. Treadgold: 1922-1994

  • Peter F. Sugar
  • Journal:
    Slavic Review / Volume 54 / Issue 2 / Summer 1995
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 January 2017, pp. 560-562
    Print publication:
    Summer 1995
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Quo Vadis, Eastern Europe?

  • Peter F. Sugar
  • Journal:
    Nationalities Papers / Volume 22 / Issue 1 / Spring 1994
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 November 2018, pp. 35-47
    Print publication:
    Spring 1994

  • As these pages are being written, a fragile cease-fire is holding in Croatia, and the Bosnian legislature is about to declare Bosnia-Hercegovina an independent state despite the strenuous opposition of close to forty percent of the population. When hostilities began in Croatia, the Serb insurgents there called themselves cetniks and referred to their enemies as ustasa, World War II labels which the Serb media promptly adopted. Bosnian Serbs might call themselves cetniks too, should it come to open hostilities in that republic, but they will have trouble finding a label that would be applicable not only to their Croat, but also to their Muslim enemies.

Page 1 of 3