In what has to be one of the most rapid transformations in world history – just seven years from 1949 to 1956 – the Communist Party transformed China from a weak, fractious country into a tightly centralized one with a substantially expanded industrial base, achieving many of the goals that had proved elusive for the Nationalists. Criminal gangs were suppressed, inflation was tamed, everyone was put to work, and the country fought the United States and allied forces to a standstill in Korea. Xinjiang and Tibet, regions that had been part of the Qing empire, were brought under the control of the central government.
As the Communist Party imposed control of cities, it borrowed from the playbook of the Soviet Union, instituting central planning and tight integration of the party and the state. With Soviet assistance, massive modernization projects were begun and soon new factories, railroads, schools, hospitals, and reservoirs were transforming the landscape. Mao's radical Great Leap Forward of 1958 mobilized the country to speed up industrialization but resulted in a human-made famine of tragic proportions. The raucous and exhilarating Cultural Revolution that Mao launched in 1966 came close to destroying the party-state he had been identified with for so long. It unfolded in unintended ways and left many feeling victimized.
For ordinary people, life during the Mao period was highly politicized. New values were heralded: people were taught that struggle and revolution were good while compromise, deference, and tradition were bad. What farmers would produce, where and how their children would be educated, what they might read in books and newspapers, where they could live or travel, all came increasingly under political control. At the same time, literacy and life expectancy greatly improved as schools and public health measures reached more deeply into the countryside.
During Mao's lifetime, the outside world's knowledge of what was happening in China was severely limited. The state controlled the media and allowed publication only of approved messages. Scholars could analyze what the public was told, but had little to go on for other important issues, such as how policies were determined, how uniformly they were enforced, or what ordinary people actually thought.