We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A supply disruption alert in 2020, now rescinded, notified UK prescribers of the planned discontinuation of Priadel® (lithium carbonate) tablets. This service evaluation explored lithium dose and plasma levels before and after the switching of lithium brands, in order to determine the interchangeability of different brands of lithium from a pharmacokinetic perspective.
Results
Data on the treatment of 37 patients switched from Priadel® tablets were analysed. Switching to Camcolit® controlled-release tablets at the same dose did not result in meaningful differences in plasma lithium levels. Dose adjustment and known or suspected poor medication adherence were associated with greater variability in plasma lithium levels on switching brands.
Clinical implications
For comparable pre- and post-switch doses in adherent patients, the most common brands of lithium carbonate appear to produce similar plasma lithium levels. British National Formulary guidance relating to switching lithium brands may be unnecessarily complex.
The purpose of this study was to look longitudinally at ECT practice in England over the past 7 years: namely over the following key time periods; 2012/13, 2014/15, 2016/17, 2017/18, and 2018/19. A previous study by Chaplin et al, published in 2016, found that there had been a striking decline observed in the number of courses of ECT prescribed to patients from 2006 to two time points i.e. 2012/13 and 2014/15.
In this study we investigated whether or not this trend had continued. Hence we looked at the change in frequency of ECT use, the length of ECT courses, patient demographics and clinical outcomes; between 2012/13 and 2018/19.
Background
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for Major Depression, Treatment-Resistant Depression, Catatonia, and Clozapine-resistant psychosis. There have been regular improvements in the administration of ECT, over the past two decades. Increases in the volume of the hippocampus and the amygdala have consistently been observed in ECT studies. Stigma has been the major barrier to patients receiving ECT in a timely fashion. The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) Centre for Quality Improvement (CCQI) established the ECT Accreditation Service (ECTAS) back in 2006. ECTAS had the aim of standardising ECT practice through the production of evidence-based standards that all member ECT Clinics could use to support their practice.
Method
We looked at the minimum dataset of information collected from ECTAS Members within England for the following years; 2012/13, 2014/15, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19. In 2012/13, 2325 adjusted courses of ECT treatment were given to patients in England. In 2014/15 it was 2302.
Result
Between 2012/13 and 2018/19; two thirds of ECT patients continue to be female. The modal age of patients has also remained the same at 70 years. The number of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 receiving ECT has gone up by 12%; suggesting that the patients receiving ECT were more clinically unwell. After treatment, CGI scale scores (i.e. the very much improved and much improved scores) slightly reduced by 6% from 2012/3 to 2018/19.
Conclusion
The use of ECT in England notably declined from 2006 to 2012/13 and 2014/15. However, from 2012/13 to 2018/19, ECT use has remained relatively stable; suggesting that it is currently being used appropriately on patients, who are amongst the most severely unwell. The clinical effectiveness of ECT remains high however, it has slightly dipped by 6%.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.