Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

124 results

Page 1 of 7

  • The United States and the Statute of Rome
  • Monroe Leigh
  • Journal: American Journal of International Law / Volume 95 / Issue 1 / January 2001
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2017, pp. 124-131
  • Print publication: January 2001
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation
  • Witness Anonymity is Inconsistent with Due Process
  • Monroe Leigh
  • Journal: American Journal of International Law / Volume 91 / Issue 1 / January 1997
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017, pp. 80-83
  • Print publication: January 1997
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation
  • The Political Consequences of Economic Embargoes
  • Monroe Leigh
  • Journal: American Journal of International Law / Volume 89 / Issue 1 / January 1995
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017, pp. 74-77
  • Print publication: January 1995
  • View extract

    The failure of the U.S.-led embargo against Haiti had become notorious long before the time President Clinton decided to invade Haiti in order to restore President Aristide to office. The embargo had failed to unseat the junta and it had worked enormous hardship on the poor people of Haiti—so much so that thousands were willing to risk their lives on the high seas in makeshift vessels to seek asylum in the United States. This comment deals not with the legalities of the President’s action—which seem clear enough in view of the Security Council resolutions—but, rather, with the political consequences of the economic embargo in Haiti as well as elsewhere.

Page 1 of 7