We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The aim of this study was the assessment of −308G/A tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α gene polymorphism and intPLA2 gene polymorphism in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and healthy controls.
Subjects:
We studied 91 non-related patients with AN and 144 healthy women (blood donors and students). The mean age of women from study group was 18.22 years (SD ± 3.13 years) and from control group was 31.71 years (SD ± 8.22).
Methods:
Gene polymorphisms were studied with the use of polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. TNF-α gene polymorphism consists of G/A substitution in −308 promoter region. IntPLA2 gene polymorphism is related to intron 1, in which restrictive region is found and recognized by BanI enzyme.
Results:
We did not obtain statistically significant differences in the frequency of genotypes and alleles of −308G/A TNF-α polymorphism between the study and control groups (genotypes: P = 0.106, alleles: P = 0.076). We did analogous analysis in the restrictive and bulimic subgroups. We did not observe statistically relevant differences in the frequency of genotypes (P = 0.700) and alleles (P = 0.305). We did not obtain statistically relevant difference in the frequency of genotypes and alleles of intPLA2 gene between the study group and controls (genotypes: P = 0.300, alleles: P = 0.331). We did analogous analysis in both subgroups of AN. We did not observe statistically relevant differences in the frequency of genotypes (P = 0.344) and alleles (P = 0.230).
Conclusions:
There was no statistically relevant trend for the association between TNF-α polymorphism and AN. We did not find association between studied polymorphism of intPLA2 gene and risk of AN.
Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin reuptake inhibitors are
considered to be equally effective, but differences may have been
obscured by internally inconsistent measurement scales and inefficient
statistical analyses.
Aims
To test the hypothesis that escitalopram and nortriptyline differ in
their effects on observed mood, cognitive and neurovegetative symptoms of
depression.
Method
In a multicentre part-randomised open-label design (the Genome Based
Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) study) 811 adults with moderate
to severe unipolar depression were allocated to flexible dosage
escitalopram or nortriptyline for 12 weeks. The weekly Montgomery–Åsberg
Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and Beck
Depression Inventory were scored both conventionally and in a more novel
way according to dimensions of observed mood, cognitive symptoms and
neurovegetative symptoms.
Results
Mixed-effect linear regression showed no difference between escitalopram
and nortriptyline on the three original scales, but symptom dimensions
revealed drug-specific advantages. Observed mood and cognitive symptoms
improved more with escitalopram than with nortriptyline. Neurovegetative
symptoms improved more with nortriptyline than with escitalopram.
Conclusions
The three symptom dimensions provided sensitive descriptors of
differential antidepressant response and enabled identification of
drug-specific effects.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.