We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The EU’s common commercial policy is used as an instrument to realize its values in EU trading partners, reflected in the inclusion of sustainable trade and development chapters in EU preferential trade agreements (PTAs). This chapter asks if including non-trade provisions (NTPs) in EU PTAs has a systematic positive effect on non-trade outcomes in partner countries. It analyzes the relationship between bilateral trade flows, the coverage of NTPs in EU PTAs and the performance of EU partner countries on several non-trade outcome variables using synthetic control methods. It finds no robust evidence of a causal effect of including NTPs in EU PTAs on indicators of non-trade outcomes.
Even though there were linkages between European Union trade policy and “values” before 2009 (in particular with the institution of dialogues under the various association agreements concluded before 2009 or via the link between development policy and trade), linking non-trade policy objectives (NTPOs) and EU values to EU trade policy has become an increasingly prominent feature. The further politization of trade policy with greater power of the Parliament, which must give its consent to the conclusion of trade agreements since the Lisbon Treaty (Article 207 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, TFEU), and the rising citizen concerns on the impact of some trade agreements on NTPOs – as shown by the manifestations related to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and EU–Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) – has created more political pressure to enhance these linkages. Finally, the realization that trade can be a useful tool for achieving NTPO objectives, for example in promoting policies in line with climate change objectives, has also called for the multiplication of these trade/NTPOs linkages in bilateral, regional and multilateral engagement with third countries (using soft power via dialogues and non-binding agreements) but also for the enhancement and proper enforcement of NTPO provisions in trade agreements (moving toward a stronger hard law approach in the future). The latter is notably the main objective of the most recent European Commission Communication published in June 2022 on the power of trade partnership as tools to foster green and just economic growth.
The European Union’s trade policy has seen a dramatic increase in attention over the past few years. In face of the challenges facing the global trade regime, ranging from trade conflicts between the EU and major world powers to the maintenance of a rules-based trade order under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (WTO), policymakers, experts, and the public have converged in highlighting the importance of trade policy making. The attention paid to trade policy has increased disproportionately in the wake of Covid-19, which led to political pressure to re-shore global value chains and enhance “strategic autonomy”, and reinforced the need to use trade as a tool to pursue non-trade policy objectives (NTPOs) – such as human rights, labour rights, and environmental commitments – in third countries.
Bringing together leading experts in trade law and policy, this volume investigates the coherence between the European Union's trade policy and its non-trade objectives. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, it highlights previously unaddressed dimensions of EU policy objectives and outcomes. With a range of illustrative case studies, the contributions offer in-depth analysis while making key issues and policy conclusions accessible to readers without specialist training. Pushing the frontiers of research on trade, investment, and non-trade issues, the volume advances debates concerning the reform of the international trade regime and the EU's adoption of a new trade policy. Bolstered by a diverse range of contributors and perspectives, this expansive collection recognises the achievements of the current EU trade policy, assesses its limits, and puts forth actionable recommendations for how it may be improved.
Unlike trade in goods, market access commitments for services usually comprise regulatory measures as opposed to trade taxes. In other words, they are generally about non-tariff measures (NTMs). In some sectors foreign access may be limited or completely prohibited through quantitative restrictions, e.g. bans on foreign provision of broadcasting or transport services, or requirements that government officials fly on the national airline. More generally, services activities are often regulated. Differences in regulation may then result in additional costs for foreign providers when they contest a market. Because they involve sale of intangibles in the form of service flows rather than physical goods, there is usually some form of direct interaction between service producers and customers. This means that establishment is more likely to be important for service exports than goods exports, resulting in an effective mix of cross-border and FDI related regulatory measures when we discuss market access in services.
The external trade policy of the European Union (EU) involves nearly one-fifth of world trade. Hence an understanding of the principles and practice of EU trade policy, the Common Commercial Policy (CCP), is of vital importance for understanding the EU’s role and impact on the global economy.
With growing trade, falling transaction costs, better information and communication technologies, global economic integration is increasing; ‘globalization’ is on the rise (if one wanted to be trendy). Global production chains are common in most industries and are essential for maintaining competitiveness. Thus the EU’s external trade policy has an increasing role to play in promoting the competitiveness of the European industries and ensuring EU economic growth.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.