Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

23 results

Page 1 of 2

  • 16 - The Implications of Mega-regional Trade Agreements on the World Trade Organization

  • from V - Asia-Pacific Regional Integration: Towards Convergence?
  • Edited by Basu Das Sanchita, Masahiro Kawai
  • Book: Trade Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific
  • Published by: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
  • Published online: 05 July 2016
  • Print publication: 11 April 2016, pp 323-340

  • Summary

    INTRODUCTION

    Mega-regional trade agreements are the most recent manifestation of regionalism since its revival in the 1980s. In the past five years, there has been much discussion about the effects of these so-called mega-regionals on the global economy, the most important of which are: the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). An additional preferential initiative currently under consideration, although not yet under negotiation, is the Free Trade Agreement of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), encompassing the full membership of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). According to the World Economic Forum, megaregional trade agreements are defined as:

    … deep integration partnerships in the form of RTAs [regional trade agreements] between countries or regions with a major share of world trade and FDI [foreign direct investment] and in which two or more of the parties are in a paramount driver position, or serve as hubs, in global value chains (i.e. the US, the EU, Japan, China) (Meléndez-Ortiz 2014, p. 13).

    Thus, their size is what differentiates the RCEP, TPP, and TTIP from other Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and makes their study unique and pertinent. As detailed in Table 16.1, the successful negotiation of the RCEP, TPP, or TTIP would create a vast integrated market across several countries, commanding a substantial portion of the world's trade and gross domestic product (GDP). Moreover, their officially proposed completion date of 2015 indicates the high level of priority that their members have accorded these prospective agreements. As we have seen with the TPP, however, a 2015 completion date may well prove elusive. The purpose of such integration in these mega-regionals is to provide increased market access, regulatory compatibility, and a “rules basket” to iron out variations in business and investment climates (Meléndez-Ortiz 2014, p. 13). Simply put, mega-regionals are large PTAs designed to facilitate trade liberalization among its members.

    Yet, PTAs — including mega-regionals — are problematic “two-faced” arrangements because they offer free trade only to members and protection against non-members, as Jagdish Bhagwati reminds us (Bhagwati 2008, pp. 16–17).

The 3rd ASEAN Reader
  • Edited in consultation with Kee Beng Ooi, Sanchita Basu Das, Terence Chong, Malcolm Cook, Cassey Lee, Michael Chai Ming Yeo
  • Published by: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
  • Published online: 22 June 2017
  • Print publication: 17 August 2015
  • Over the past two decades, ISEAS has compiled abridged articles that analyse key aspects of Southeast Asia's development and the ASEAN process. The ASEAN Reader was published in 1992 just as the Cold War ended, while The Second ASEAN Reader came in 2003 in the wake of the 1997 Asian crisis and the September 11 attacks in 2001. The past decade has not been spared its share of intense changes, with the rise of China and India bringing new challenges to the region's power equation, and the impact of the 2008 global financial crisis. Despite this, the momentum towards an integrated ASEAN community has been maintained. The articles in The Third ASEAN Reader study the trends and events of recent years, and discuss the immediate future of Southeast Asia.

Page 1 of 2