Excessive salt intake raises blood pressure and increases the risk of non-communicable diseases (NCD), such as CVD, chronic kidney disease and stomach cancer. Reducing the Na content of food is an important public health measure to control the NCD. This study quantifies the amount of salt reduced by using umami substances, i.e. glutamate, inosinate and guanylate, for adults in the USA.

The secondary data analysis was performed using data of the US nationally representative cross-sectional dietary survey, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017–2018. Per capita daily salt intake corresponding to the NHANES food groups was calculated in the four hypothetical scenarios of 0 %, 30 %, 60 % and 90 % market share of low-Na foods in the country. The salt reduction rates by using umami substances were estimated based on the previous study results.

The USA

4139 individuals aged 20 years and older in the USA

Replacing salt with umami substances could help the US adults reduce salt intake by 7·31–13·53 % (7·50–13·61 % for women and 7·18–13·53 % for men), which is equivalent to 0·61–1·13 g/d (0·54–0·98 g/d for women and 0·69–1·30 g/d for men) without compromising the taste. Approximately, 21·21–26·04 % of the US adults could keep their salt intake below 5 g/d, the WHO’s recommendation in the scenario where there is no low-Na product on the market.

This study provides essential information that the use of umami substances as a substitute for salt may help reduce the US adults’ salt intake.

Recently, the risk of flood disasters due to concentrated heavy rains has been increasing in Japan. While some cases of hospital evacuation have been reported, standards for hospital evacuation have not been established and regional administrative evacuation plans do not include medical facilities.

To clarify the timeline for in-hospital vertical evacuation during a flood disaster.

A timeline was set for vertical evacuation as criteria of the hospital’s emergency response based on the Arakawa River Downstream Timeline, which is an estimate of the time until river flooding based on the water level of the Arakawa River located near the facility. The timeline was calculated backward from 0 hours to when the river floods. A drill was held for verification.

The timeline was based on the water level of the Arakawa River and objective evidence of risky transfer of critical patients; therefore, the decision to evacuate was made when the water level reached a dangerous level (-3 hours). However, this did not provide enough time to evacuate patients in all hospital departments simultaneously, resulting in a shortage of human resources. There was a planned shutdown of the electronic clinical record system at 0 hours to avoid water damage and evacuation of its server, but three hours were not enough to prepare patient clinical summaries.

There is a need for greater and earlier preparation for evacuation to reduce or discharge patients who can leave the hospital when a flood disaster is predicted. Only in-hospital vertical evacuation was considered because it is very risky to transfer critical patients without an evacuation order from government or municipal officials. In fact, over 10,000 patients would need to be evacuated in the region if the Arakawa River floods. Therefore, a regional plan is indispensable for such large scale and simultaneous hospital evacuations.