One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field.

To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline.

1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort “SURVIVE” were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated.

People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging.

People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.

Brazil’s public health system serves most of the population, but 25 percent of citizens rely on private health insurance. The National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS) regulates private medicine reimbursements, which diverge from the public sector threshold. In 2022, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) set a willingness-to-pay benchmark of BRL40,000 (USD8,215) per quality-adjusted life-year. The ANS has no such benchmark, highlighting a pivotal gap in economic evaluations for private health care.

This quantitative study investigated the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for reimbursed medicines in Brazil’s private health sector, comparing them with CONITEC’s benchmarks and international thresholds. Data were extracted from industry reimbursement submissions to the ANS and analyzed for statistical disparity and policy implications.

Preliminary findings found an ICER peak of BRL619,900 (USD127,220) per quality-adjusted life-year for talazoparib, which is used to treat certain advanced breast cancers. This contrasted sharply with CONITEC’s established threshold, indicating a critical need to evaluate ANS policies.

Early results indicate that the ICERs for some medicines surpass CONITEC’s willingness-to-pay limit, suggesting that the ANS should consider establishing a defined cost-effectiveness threshold. This is imperative to harmonize with global standards and maintain sustainable health financing.

Despite medical advancements, endocarditis still results in high mortality rates. Surgery, while often essential, elevates the risk of hyperinflammation, sepsis, and cytokine release. The use of a cytokine filter to prevent this remains controversial. This study reviewed existing literature to assess the efficacy of cytokine filters and to support its integration into supplementary health services.

An exhaustive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, and CytoSorbents Corporation databases was conducted to identify relevant meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The study focused on randomized controlled trials and case series studies assessing the efficacy of cytokine filtration. Key variables considered were the duration of antibiotic treatment, severity of endocarditis, and surgical treatment rationale. These factors were crucial for evaluating clinical outcomes and patient survival after surgery.

The systematic reviews yielded mixed outcomes. Two found no benefits for hemoadsorption, while one found that it reduced mortality rates and intensive care unit stays based on observational studies. Randomized controlled trials, however, showed no significant impact for cytokine filters on mortality rates or postoperative hemodynamic parameters. In contrast, case series studies reported potential benefits, but these results were confounded by biases in patient allocation and failure to account for critical variables like antibiotic treatment duration, case severity, and surgical rationale. These discrepancies highlight the complexity of evaluating the effectiveness of cytokine filtration in surgical settings.

Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on the role of cytokine filters in cardiac surgery for endocarditis reported contradictory findings. Only case series studies suggested benefits from cytokine filters, necessitating further high quality research before recommending their widespread use. Understanding the implications of these results is essential, underscoring the need for more rigorous studies to resolve these inconsistencies.

Informed healthcare policies in Brazil rely on robust health technology assessment (HTA), especially for conditions like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present an efficiency frontier analysis to evaluate NSCLC treatments that correlates annual treatment costs with clinical outcomes, offering a systematic approach to enhance decision-making in the Brazilian healthcare context.

This quantitative study analyzed NSCLC drug costs within the Brazilian healthcare system and the clinical efficacy data of pivotal studies. The data were analyzed using Python and R software. The dataset comprised drug costs and hazard ratios for overall survival. After data preparation, which involved normalization and outlier management, we constructed an efficiency frontier by ranking drugs based on cost and effectiveness. A linear regression model was then developed to extrapolate this frontier, deriving a formula that predicts treatment costs for specified improvements in overall survival.

The analysis delineated an efficiency frontier and revealed cost-effective NSCLC treatments in Brazil. The following linear regression equation was derived: overall survival = (1.033551 − 0.000003) × treatment cost (USD). This allows for the estimation of appropriate treatment costs for new therapies based on their expected clinical outcomes. This initial model provides a foundation for estimating the economic impact of new treatments.

This preliminary efficiency frontier analysis offers a novel perspective for evaluating NSCLC treatment strategies in Brazil to support sustainable healthcare policy decisions. The model is subject to limitations due to the absence of a systematic literature review. However, it represents an initial step towards a more comprehensive HTA framework. Further research should refine the model by including systematic data collection and analysis.

The RedETS horizon scanning (HS) program in Spain is focused on identifying non-pharmaceutical emerging health technologies. HS is organized in three steps: (i) identification using different sources (PubMed, the biomedical press, and others); (ii) screening performed by the HS Working Group and clinicians; and (iii) prioritization using the PriTec tool. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of RedETS HS in identifying disruptive emerging technologies for our health system.

Data from brief files and full reports related to the identified emerging technologies were collected. Full health technology assessment (HTA) reports were also reviewed. The period of analysis was from 2016 to 2023. The information collected included the name, type, category, and indication of the emerging technology and the source of identification. An ad hoc Excel spreadsheet was designed to collect the information. The analysis consisted of a description of the variables and an assessment of concordance between the emerging technologies identified and those with full HTA reports.

There were 338 emerging technologies identified. These technologies were mainly therapeutic (52.1%) or diagnostic (25.7%). In addition, about 45 percent were medical devices and 15.7 percent were in vitro diagnostic tests; imaging comprised 7.4 percent. Most of the emerging technologies were identified through the biomedical press (22.2%), PubMed (23.6%) and industry (20.3%). In a preliminary analysis of these main sources, 31 percent of the technologies identified by HS had full HTA reports, with all of these being identified three years before the HTA.

HS systems might help identify the most relevant technologies for healthcare systems, enabling them to be more ready to incorporate the new technologies. Therefore, HS must be able to detect emerging technologies that will have an impact on the health system. Periodic evaluation of the accuracy of HS programs will improve their impact in the HTA process.

In Brazil, equitable access to medications is critical. There are significant pricing disparities between the National Health System and private health care, which are influenced by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) and Law 14.307. This study investigated these disparities, with aim of proposing strategies for equitable access and sustainability in health care.

This analysis compared prices between the public and private sectors for trastuzumab and adalimumab. Public sector prices were obtained from the Health Prices Database (HPD) and private sector prices were obtained from the Unimed National Table of Materials and Medications (TNUMM), as of May 2023. The study evaluated the extent of pricing discrepancies, considering Drug Market Regulation Chamber ceiling prices and industry discounts.

The cost of the trastuzumab biosimilar, KANJINTI® (Amgen Inc.), was BRL15.79 (USD3.24) per mg in the private sector, compared with BRL4.50 (USD0.92) per mg in the public sector (a 250% difference). The original version of adalimumab, HUMIRA® (AbbVie), was priced at BRL5,450.38 (USD1,120.53) in the TNUMM versus BRL2,445.46 (USD502.33) in the HPD (a 123% difference). The adalimumab biosimilar, HYRIMOZ® (Sandoz Inc.), was priced at BRL7,723.99 (USD1,586.87) in the TNUMM compared with BRL2,449.19 (USD503.05) in the HPD (a 215% price discrepancy).

The study highlights significant disparities in drug pricing between Brazil’s public and private healthcare sectors. These disparities affect the financial sustainability of private health entities and elevate costs for consumers, potentially increasing reliance on the National Health System. Policy revisions, price parity strategies, and further studies are vital for a sustainable healthcare system.

A consortium of five Spanish health technology assessment (HTA) agencies conducted the European Reference Networks Guidelines Programme for the development, appraisal, and implementation of clinical practice guidelines aiming to support clinical decision-making in the field of rare diseases (RDs). In response to this objective, methodologists and information specialists conducted systematic reviews (SRs). This study aims to explore the barriers/facilitators they encountered.

A survey was designed to elicit HTA agencies’ experience in developing SRs on RDs. Information was collected on the number of SRs conducted and the types of RDs and clinical questions addressed. In addition, they were asked to identify barriers and facilitators for each stage of the review (from the definition of PICO [population, intervention, comparator, outcome] components of the question to the issuing of recommendations). Finally, they were asked for process improvement suggestions. The survey was distributed by email and completed online. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the issues identified at each stage of SR.

A total of 111 SRs were conducted on 35 RDs. Most clinical questions were about diagnosis and treatment. The main barriers identified were lack of MesH (Medical Subject Headings) terms associated with the conditions, non-representative abstracts and keywords, lack of relevant information in the body of the articles, and reported data not allowing for quantitative syntheses or recommendations to be made. Facilitating aspects included Orphanet’s specific source of RD documents and having expert clinicians in the working groups who were also involved in all steps of the SR.

Conducting SRs in the field of RDs is challenging. Authors of primary studies are encouraged to be more exhaustive in reporting the results. More research focused on the SR methodology in RDs is necessary to address their particular characteristics and obtain robust results. It is crucial to collaborate with reference networks to address RDs, where the evidence is scarce.

Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between “leaky gut syndrome” and low-grade systemic inflammation in individuals with psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia. Gut dysbiosis could increase intestinal permeability, allowing the passage of toxins and bacteria into the systemic circulation, subsequently triggering immune-reactive responses. This study delves into understanding the relationship between plasma markers of intestinal permeability and symptom severity in schizophrenia. Furthermore, the influence of lifestyle habits on these intestinal permeability markers was determined.

Biomarkers of intestinal permeability, namely lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), were analyzed in 242 adult schizophrenia patients enrolled in an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study from four centers in Spain (PI17/00246). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, including psychoactive drug use, lifestyle habits, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale to evaluate schizophrenia symptom severity, and the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry to assess cognitive performance.

Results revealed elevated levels of LBP and LPS in a significant proportion of patients with schizophrenia (62% and 25.6%, respectively). However, no statistically significant correlation was observed between these biomarkers and the overall clinical severity of psychotic symptoms or cognitive performance, once confounding variables were controlled for. Interestingly, adherence to a Mediterranean diet was negatively correlated with I-FABP levels (beta = −0.186, t = −2.325, p = 0.021), suggesting a potential positive influence on intestinal barrier function.

These findings underscore the importance of addressing dietary habits and promoting a healthy lifestyle in individuals with schizophrenia, with potential implications for both physical and psychopathological aspects of the disorder.

Both childhood adversity (CA) and first-episode psychosis (FEP) have been linked to alterations in cortical thickness (CT). The interactive effects between different types of CAs and FEP on CT remain understudied.

One-hundred sixteen individuals with FEP (mean age = 23.8 ± 6.9 years, 34% females, 80.2% non-affective FEP) and 98 healthy controls (HCs) (mean age = 24.4 ± 6.2 years, 43% females) reported the presence/absence of CA <17 years using an adapted version of the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA.Q) and the Retrospective Bullying Questionnaire (RBQ) and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Correlation analyses were used to assess associations between brain maps of CA and FEP effects. General linear models (GLMs) were performed to assess the interaction effects of CA and FEP on CT.

Eighty-three individuals with FEP and 83 HCs reported exposure to at least one CA. CT alterations in FEP were similar to those found in participants exposed to separation from parents, bullying, parental discord, household poverty, and sexual abuse (r = 0.50 to 0.25). Exposure to neglect (β = −0.24, 95% CI [−0.37 to −0.12], p = 0.016) and overall maltreatment (β = −0.13, 95% CI [−0.20 to −0.06], p = 0.043) were associated with cortical thinning in the right medial orbitofrontal region.

Cortical alterations in individuals with FEP are similar to those observed in the context of socio-environmental adversity. Neglect and maltreatment may contribute to CT reductions in FEP. Our findings provide new insights into the specific neurobiological effects of CA in early psychosis.

The New Jersey Kids Study (NJKS) is a transdisciplinary statewide initiative to understand influences on child health, development, and disease. We conducted a mixed-methods study of project planning teams to investigate team effectiveness and relationships between team dynamics and quality of deliverables.

Ten theme-based working groups (WGs) (e.g., Neurodevelopment, Nutrition) informed protocol development and submitted final reports. WG members (n = 79, 75%) completed questionnaires including de-identified demographic and professional information and a modified TeamSTEPPS Team Assessment Questionnaire (TAQ). Reviewers independently evaluated final reports using a standardized tool. We analyzed questionnaire results and final report assessments using linear regression and performed constant comparative qualitative analysis to identify central themes.

WG-level factors associated with greater team effectiveness included proportion of full professors (β = 31.24, 95% CI 27.65–34.82), team size (β = 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.92), and percent dedicated research effort (β = 0.11, 95% CI 0.09–0.13); age distribution (β = −2.67, 95% CI –3.00 to –2.38) and diversity of school affiliations (β = –33.32, 95% CI –36.84 to –29.80) were inversely associated with team effectiveness. No factors were associated with final report assessments. Perceptions of overall initiative leadership were associated with expressed enthusiasm for future NJKS participation. Qualitative analyses of final reports yielded four themes related to team science practices: organization and process, collaboration, task delegation, and decision-making patterns.

We identified several correlates of team effectiveness in a team science initiative's early planning phase. Extra effort may be needed to bridge differences in team members' backgrounds to enhance the effectiveness of diverse teams. This work also highlights leadership as an important component in future investigator engagement.

Patients with schizophrenia die decades earlier than the general population. Among the factors involved in this mortality gap, evidence suggests a telomere length shortening in this clinical population, which is associated with premature ageing. Recent studies support the use of strength-based training exercise programmes to maintain, or even elongate, telomere length in healthy elderly populations. However, studies aiming at modifying telomere length in severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, are still very scarce.

To investigate the effect of a strength-based physical exercise programme on the telomere length of individuals with schizophrenia.

We propose a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial including 40 patients aged ≥18 years, with a stable diagnosis of schizophrenia, attending the Complejo de Rehabilitación Psicosocial (CRPS, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Centre) in Salamanca, Spain. These patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive the usual treatment and rehabilitation programmes offered by CRPS (treatment-as-usual group) or these plus twice weekly sessions of an evidence-based, strength-based training exercise programme for 12 weeks (intervention group). The primary outcome will be effect on telomere length. Secondary outcomes will include impact on cognitive function, frailty and quality of life.

We expect to show the importance of implementing strength-based physical exercise programmes for patients with schizophrenia. We could find that such programmes induce biological and genetic changes that may lengthen life expectancy and decrease physical fragility.

We anticipate that our trial findings could contribute to parity of esteem for mental health, reducing premature ageing in patients with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia.