There is no clear evidence about how to support people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) during the perinatal period. Perinatal emotional skills groups (ESGs) may be helpful, but their efficacy has not been tested.

To test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of perinatal ESGs for women and birthing people with BPD.

Two-arm parallel-group feasibility RCT. We recruited people from two centres, aged over 18 years, meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BPD, who were pregnant or within 12 months of a live birth. Eligible individuals were randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to ESGs + treatment as usual (TAU), or to TAU. Outcomes were assessed at 4 months post randomisation.

A total of 100% of the pre-specified sample (n = 48) was recruited over 6 months, and we obtained 4-month outcome data on 92% of randomised participants. In all, 54% of participants allocated to perinatal ESGs attended 75% of the full group treatment (median number of sessions: 9 (interquartile range 6–11). At 4 months, levels of BPD symptoms (adjusted coefficient −2.0, 95% CI −6.2 to 2.1) and emotional distress (−2.4, 95% CI −6.2 to 1.5) were lower among those allocated to perinatal ESGs. The directionality of effect on well-being and social functioning also favoured the intervention. The cost of delivering perinatal ESGs was estimated to be £918 per person.

Perinatal ESGs may represent an effective intervention for perinatal women and birthing people with BPD. Their efficacy should be tested in a fully powered RCT, and this is a feasible undertaking.

ISRCTN80470632.

Eating disorders (ED) have significant physical and psychosocial impacts, and the highest mortality rates of any psychiatric illness. About a third of patients with Anorexia Nervosa or Bulimia Nervosa do not recover and develop persistent ED. Development of novel treatments is a priority to prevent adverse effects on young people's physical, relational and educational development. Virtual reality (VR) has shown promising efficacy as an innovative mental health treatment, and has potential therapeutic value within ED. People with lived experience (PWLE) and clinicians have demonstrated enthusiasm for a VR café intervention to practice social and food-related challenges. A VR café would enable gradual exposure to challenges in a protected environment, aiming to support people with ED to return to real-life cafés and social eating. This study aims to explore the opinions of key stakeholders to help inform the development of a VR café scenario as an adjunctive treatment for ED.

We conducted semi-structured focus groups and 1:1 interviews with PWLE aged 14–25 years (n = 15), parents/carers (n = 4), and clinicians (n = 6). Participants were recruited via social media, advertisement via ED charities, posters in public places, and snowballing. Following completion of an online screening survey, eligible individuals were invited to participate using purposive sampling to ensure diversity of ages, ethnicities, genders, ED diagnoses, and health professional roles. Data were analysed thematically.

Preliminary analysis indicates that PWLE, parents/carers and clinicians expressed mostly positive opinions regarding a VR café adjunctive treatment. Expressed concerns related to themes of intervention efficacy, translation of learnt skills to real life, and use of VR technology. Most participants agreed a VR café intervention should be a repeated experience (many suggested graded exposure), realistic, and maximally individualised. All stakeholder groups identified a similar range of challenges to experience within a VR café, with themes including choosing food, other people, eating socially or alone, and the café environment. Differences in specific aspects of the scenario that might make challenges harder or easier reflected the unique experiences of individual participants.

These findings build upon previous research demonstrating support from PWLE, parents/carers, and clinicians for the development of a VR café adjunctive treatment for ED. Themes identified are largely consistent across stakeholder groups and relate to the design of a VR café scenario and its implementation as a treatment. This analysis enables the perspectives of key stakeholders to be incorporated into the design of a novel VR café intervention to optimise efficacy and acceptability.

Self-harm and eating disorders are often comorbid in clinical samples but their co-occurrence in the general population is unclear. Given that only a small proportion of individuals who self-harm or have disordered eating present to clinical services, and that both self-harm and eating disorders are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, we aimed to study these behaviours at a population level.

We assessed the co-occurrence of self-harm and disordered eating behaviours in 3384 females and 2326 males from a UK population-based cohort: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Participants reported on their self-harm and disordered eating behaviours (fasting, purging, binge-eating and excessive exercise) in the last year via questionnaire at 16 and 24 years. At each age we assessed how many individuals who self-harm also reported disordered eating, and how many individuals with disordered eating also reported self-harm.

We found high comorbidity of self-harm and disordered eating. Almost two-thirds of 16-year-old females, and two-in-five 24-year-old males who self-harmed also reported some form of disordered eating. Young people with disordered eating reported higher levels of self-harm at both ages compared to those without disordered eating.

As self-harm and disordered eating commonly co-occur in young people in the general population, it is important to screen for both sets of difficulties to provide appropriate treatment.

Patients often have very different ideas from clinicians about what they want treatments to achieve. Their views on what outcomes are important are not always reflected in trials.

To elicit the views of people who self-harm on the most commonly used outcome measures and to identify the outcomes that matter to them.

We conducted in-depth interviews with 18 people with histories of self-harm, recruited from hospital and community settings. We conducted thematic analysis using a framework approach and used visual mapping to arrive at our final analysis and interpretation.

Participants' accounts contained a number of challenges to the validity and meaningfulness of current trial outcome measures. Five broad issues emerged: (a) relationship between frequency and severity of self-harm; (b) behavioural substitution; (b) self-management skills; (d) the role of self-harm as survival tool and affect regulator, and (e) strategic self-presentation. We show how these affect the visibility and measurability of commonly used outcomes. The outcomes that mattered to participants focused on positive achievements in three domains: (a) general functioning and activities of everyday living; (b) social participation, and (c) engagement with services. Participants conceptualised these as both measures and means of sustained improvement.

Our findings suggest that current self-harm trial science rests on flawed assumptions about the relationship between mental states and behaviours and about our ability to measure both. Greater understanding of the outcomes that matter to people who self-harm is needed to inform both intervention development and trial design.

Hanging is the most frequently used method of suicide in the UK and has high case fatality (>70%).

To explore factors influencing the decision to use hanging.

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 12 men and 10 women who had survived a near-fatal suicide attempt. Eight respondents had attempted hanging. Data were analysed thematically and with constant comparison.

Hanging was adopted or contemplated for two main reasons: the anticipated nature of a death from hanging; and accessibility. Those favouring hanging anticipated a certain, rapid and painless death with little awareness of dying and believed it was a ‘clean’ method that would not damage the body or leave harrowing images for others. Materials for hanging were easily accessed and respondents considered it ‘simple’ to perform without the need for planning or technical knowledge. Hanging was thus seen as the ‘quickest’ and ‘easiest’ method with few barriers to completion and sometimes adopted despite not being a first choice. Respondents who rejected hanging recognised it could be slow, painful and ‘messy’, and thought technical knowledge was needed for implementation.

Prevention strategies should focus on countering perceptions of hanging as a clean, painless and rapid method that is easily implemented. However, care is needed in the delivery of such messages as some individuals could gain information that might facilitate fatal implementation. Detailed research needs to focus on developing and evaluating interventions that can manage this tension.