We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recent studies have focussed on detecting white matter abnormalities in subjects who transition to psychosis (UHR-T). Research suggests that fractional anisotropy (FA), may be decreased in UHR-T. However, global and regional findings have been inconsistent. By objectively combining data in a meta-analysis, we have investigated white matter alterations associated with transition, by comparing FA in UHR-T with subjects that do not transition (UHR-NT) and healthy volunteers.
Methods
The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021265348) and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA guidance. A systematic database search of PUBMED and EMBASE identified reports, which were screened by 2 independent researchers (CN and DD) for inclusion, from inception to 20 July 2021. Discrepancies were decided on consensus with a third researcher (KM). Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Authors of screened reports were contacted to provide parametric maps. Coordinate-based meta-analysis was conducted using Seed-based d-Mapping software to combine parametric map and coordinate data from reports, using a random-effects model. Quality and risk of bias analysis were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
Results
The search strategy identified 889 potential studies, from which 6 met eligibility criteria. A total of 71 UHR-T, 142 UHR-NT and 148 healthy volunteers were included. Weighted-mean decreases in FA were observed in UHR-T compared with: UHR-NT (d = −0.99; p < 0.0001; 95% CI −1.43 to −0.55); and healthy volunteers (d = −0.91; p = 0.04; 95% CI −1.78 to −0.05). The level of heterogeneity for the former was not significant. For UHR-T, regional FA decreases were observed in areas including the left genu of the corpus callosum (Z-score = −1.76, 204 voxels, p < 0.0001) compared with UHR-NT, while FA increases were most observed in the white matter region adjacent to the left postcentral gyrus (Z-score = 1.64, voxels = 16, p < 0.0001). These findings persisted despite sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that white matter alterations, specifically in left frontotemporal tracts, are associated with an increased risk of transition to psychosis. The neurobiological implications of these findings, and their contribution to UHR-T prediction efforts, are explored, as are avenues for further research.
To evaluate the construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIH TB-CB) in the healthy oldest-old (85+ years old).
Method:
Our sample from the McKnight Brain Aging Registry consists of 179 individuals, 85 to 99 years of age, screened for memory, neurological, and psychiatric disorders. Using previous research methods on a sample of 85 + y/o adults, we conducted confirmatory factor analyses on models of NIH TB-CB and same domain standard neuropsychological measures. We hypothesized the five-factor model (Reading, Vocabulary, Memory, Working Memory, and Executive/Speed) would have the best fit, consistent with younger populations. We assessed confirmatory and discriminant validity. We also evaluated demographic and computer use predictors of NIH TB-CB composite scores.
Results:
Findings suggest the six-factor model (Vocabulary, Reading, Memory, Working Memory, Executive, and Speed) had a better fit than alternative models. NIH TB-CB tests had good convergent and discriminant validity, though tests in the executive functioning domain had high inter-correlations with other cognitive domains. Computer use was strongly associated with higher NIH TB-CB overall and fluid cognition composite scores.
Conclusion:
The NIH TB-CB is a valid assessment for the oldest-old samples, with relatively weak validity in the domain of executive functioning. Computer use’s impact on composite scores could be due to the executive demands of learning to use a tablet. Strong relationships of executive function with other cognitive domains could be due to cognitive dedifferentiation. Overall, the NIH TB-CB could be useful for testing cognition in the oldest-old and the impact of aging on cognition in older populations.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.