To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This paper first (Section 1) discusses the meaning of the English expression ‘ordinary’, its vagueness and its context-sensitivity. The diversity of types of ordinary objects is illustrated using data from comparative linguistics. It is then argued that many such objects must exist despite their composite nature (at least at ‘close’ possible worlds) (Section 2). Two arguments are given. The first (Section 2.1) is a charity argument and is roughly that the existence, development and survival of cognitive and linguistic capacities and representations require that, for any human linguistic community c, a ‘large number’ of expressions/concepts purporting to refer to/apply to objects and used by normal, healthy adult thinkers of c must successfully refer/have a non-vacuous extension (at least at ‘close’ possible worlds). The second argument (Section 2.2) is against the van Inwagenian rephrasing strategy for mereological nihilism, and is roughly that it offers only a simulacrum of rephrasing, and that nihilism is incompatible with virtually all current scientific and ‘everyday’ reasoning and knowledge, as well as being epistemologically self-defeating. The next parts of the paper (Sections 3, 4 and 5) explain how ordinary objects can exist given their composite nature by defending a naturalistic answer to the special composition question, according to which, roughly, objects compose something at t iff they form a chain of bound states at t. An appendix (Section 6) illustrates this thesis with examples drawn from classical and quantum physics.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.