We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Phyllis Weliver, Associate Professor of English, Saint Louis University,Katharine Ellis, Stanley Hugh Badock Professor of Music at the University of Bristol
Music scholarship, whether historical or analytical, has tended to neglect sonata-form compositions after the deaths of Beethoven and Schubert in 1827 and 1828, respectively, particularly with regard to single-instrument compositions. A conventional, if perfunctory, definition – and one whose validity in the later nineteenth century this essay reappraises – typecasts sonata form as a musical structure in which two (or more) themes in contrasting keys are presented and developed, before being restated in the same key to bring closure to the movement. It is the formal design used in a majority of the first movements of solo sonatas, string quartets, symphonies and overtures in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Scholarly neglect of this form is often justified in terms either of historical significance (the market for new piano sonatas, in particular, declined significantly in the middle decades of the nineteenth century) or of the perceived intrinsic flaws of individual sonatas produced after 1828 by composers such as Schumann, Chopin and Liszt, to name only the more familiar musicians.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.