We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
If $f:\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ is a covering map between connected graphs, and $H$ is the subgroup of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4},v)$ used to construct the cover, then it is well known that the group of deck transformations of the cover is isomorphic to $N(H)/H$, where $N(H)$ is the normalizer of $H$ in $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4},v)$. We show that an entirely analogous result holds for immersions between connected graphs, where the subgroup $H$ is replaced by the closed inverse submonoid of the inverse monoid $L(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4},v)$ used to construct the immersion. We observe a relationship between group actions on graphs and deck transformations of graph immersions. We also show that a graph immersion $f:\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ may be extended to a cover $g:\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ in such a way that all deck transformations of $f$ are restrictions of deck transformations of $g$.
Thirty-five patients were randomized to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and 25 to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Stone disappearance occurred in only 12 of 32 ESWL patients [38% (95% Cl: 21–56%)] during a 15-month follow-up. Greater incremental gains in quality of life after 6 months were observed among LC patients (p <.01). Total duration of disability was 6.8 ± 8.5 days for ESWL, and 22.7 ± 16.6 days for LC (p <.01). Nine (28%) patients crossed over electively to the LC group, but only 44% of these underwent LC within the next 3 years. ESWL cost Can $58.9/ day of disability saved. ESWL is limited by its selective applicability and modest stone disappearance rate. Its cost-effectiveness is largely dependent on patient acceptance of recurrent episodes of biliary colic due to the persistence of stone fragments.
It has been established by G. Lallement (3) that the set of idempotent-separating congruences on a regular semigroup S coincides with the set ∑() of congruences on S which are contained in Green's equivalence on S. In view of this and Lemma 10.3 of A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston (1) it is obvious that the maximum idempotent-separating congruence on a regular semigroup S is given by
In (5) the author showed how to construct all inverse semigroups from their trace and semilattice of idempotents: the construction is by means of a family of mappings between ℛ-classes of the semigroup which we refer to as the structure mappings of the semigroup. In (7) (see also (8) and (9)) K. S. S. Nambooripad has adopted a similar approach to the structure of regular semigroups: he shows how to construct regular semigroups from their trace and biordered set of idempotents by means of a family of mappings between ℛ-classes and between ℒ-classes of the semigroup which we again refer to as the structure mappings of the semigroup. In the present paper we aim to provide a simpler set of axioms characterising the structure mappings on a regular semigroup than the axioms (R1)-(R7) of Nambooripad (9). Two major differences occur between Nambooripad's approach (9) and the approach adopted here: first, we consider the set of idempotents of our semigroups to be equipped with a partial regular band structure (in the sense of Clifford (3)) rather than a biorder structure, and second, we shall enlarge the set of structure mappings used by Nambooripad.
Group theory and semigroup theory have developed in somewhat different directions in the past several decades. While Cayley's theorem enables us to view groups as groups of permutations of some set, the analogous result in semigroup theory represents semigroups as semigroups of functions from a set to itself. Of course both group theory and semigroup theory have developed significantly beyond these early viewpoints, and both subjects are by now integrally woven into the fabric of modern mathematics, with connections and applications across a broad spectrum of areas.
Nevertheless, the early viewpoints of groups as groups of permutations, and semigroups as semigroups of functions, do permeate the modern literature: for example, when groups act on a set or a space, they act by permutations (or isometries, or automorphisms, etc.), whereas semigroup actions are by functions (or endomorphisms, or partial isometries, etc.). Finite dimensional linear representations of groups are representations by invertible matrices, while finite dimensional linear representations of semigroups are representations by arbitrary (not necessarily invertible) matrices. The basic structure theories for groups and semigroups are quite different — one uses the ideal structure of a semigroup to give information about the semigroup for example — and the study of homomorphisms between semigroups is complicated by the fact that a congruence on a semigroup is not in general determined by one congruence class, as is the case for groups.
We establish a one-to-one “group-like” correspondence between congruences on a free monoid X* and so-called positively self-conjugate inverse submonoids of the polycyclic monoid P(X). This enables us to translate many concepts in semigroup theory into the language of inverse semigroups.
Let S and T be inverse semigroups. Their free product S inv T is their coproduct in the category of inverse semigroups, defined by the usual commutative diagram. Previous descriptions of free products have been based, like that for the free product of groups, on quotients of the free semigroup product S sgp T. In that framework, a set of canonical forms for S inv T consists of a transversal of the classes of the congruence associated with the quotient. The general result [4] of Jones and previous partial results [3], [5], [6] take this approach.
We say that a regulär semigroup S is a coetension of a (regular) semigroup T by rectangular bands if there is a homomorphism ϕ: S → T from S onto T such that, for each e = e2 ∈ S, e(ϕ ϕ-1) is a rectangular band. Regular semigroups which are coextesions of pseudo-inverse semigroups by rectangular bands may be characterized as those regular semigroups S with the property that, for each e = e2 ∈ S, ω(e) = {f = f2 ∈ S: ef = f} and ωl(e) = {f = f2 ∈ S: fe = f} are bands: this paper is concerned with a study of such semigroups.
If ρ is a congruence on a regular semigroup S, then the kernel of ρ is defined to be the set of ρ-classes which contain idempotents of S. Preston [7] has proved that two congruences on a regular semigroup coincide if and only if they have the same kernel: this naturally poses the problem of characterizing the kernel of a congruence on a regular semigroup and reconstructing the congruence from its kernel. In some sense this problem has been resolved by the author in [5]. Using the well-known theorem of M. Teissier (see for example, A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston [1], Vol. II, Theorem 10.6), it is possible to characterize the kernel of a congruence on a regular semigroup S as a set A = {Ai: i ∈ I} of subsets of S which satisfy the Teissier-Vagner-Preston conditions:
A semigroup S is called regular if a ∈ aSa for every element a in S. The elementary properties of regular semigroups may be found in A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston [1]. A semigroup S is called orthodox if S is regular and if the idempotents of S form a subsemigroup of S.
Any congruence on a semigroup S with a nonempty set Es of idempotents induces a partition of the set Es. Two congruences ρ and σ on the semigroup S are defined to be idempotent-equivalent congruences on S if ρ and σ induce the same partition of Es. In this paper we investigate idempotent-equivalent congruences on orthodox semigroups (regular semigroups in which the set of idempotents forms a subsemigroup).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.