Dementia is often associated with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (NPS) such as agitation, hallucinations, anxiety, that can cause distress for the resident with dementia in long-term care settings and can impose emotional burden on the environment. NPS are often treated with psychotropic drugs, which, however, frequently cause side effects. Alternatively, non-pharmacological interventions can improve well-being and maintain an optimal quality of life (QoL) of those living with dementia. Music therapy is a non-pharmacological intervention that can reduce NPS and improve well-being of persons with dementia.

The main aim of this study is to assess the effects of individual music therapy on well-being controlled for providing individual attention in nursing home residents with dementia and NPS.

The research is conducted at eight facilities of one nursing home organization in the Netherlands. The participants in the intervention group receive 30 minutes of individual music therapy (MT) in their own room by a music therapist twice a week for 12 weeks. The participants in the control group receive 30 minutes of individual attention in their own room by a volunteer twice a week for 12 weeks. Assessments will be done at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. An independent observer, blinded for the intervention or control condition, assesses directly observed well-being (primary outcome) and pain before and after the sessions. Nurses assess other secondary outcomes unblinded, i.e., perceived quality of life and NPS assessed with validated scales. The sleepy duration is will be assessed by a wrist device called MotionWatch. Information about psychotropic drug use is derived from electronic medical chart review.

We will present baseline data and preliminary results.

The outcomes refer to both short-term and long-term effects consistent with therapeutic goals of care for a longer term. We hope to overcome limitations of previous study designs such as non- blinded designs and pragmatic designs in which music facilitators that were not only music therapists but occupational therapists and nurses. This study should lead to more focused recommendations for practice and further research into non-pharmacological interventions in dementia.

The trial is registered at the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal in the Netherlands Trial Registration number NL7708, registration date 04-05-2019.

Advance care planning (ACP), one of the key domains of palliative care, enables individuals to define and discuss goals and preferences for future treatment and care with family and healthcare professionals. By exploring the views of people with dementia on quality of life now and in the future, including the end of life, care provisions can be tailored to their values. The perspectives of people with young-onset dementia (YOD), with a symptom onset before the age of 65, may differ from those of older people with dementia given the different life phase and family context. Qualitative research methods can be used to elicit the attitudes and beliefs to generate insight into their perspectives.

Qualitive study, as part of the Care4Youngdem-study, using semi-structured interviews with a criterion-based purposive sample of community-dwelling people with YOD (n=10) and their (family) caregivers in the Netherlands. We adapted the interview guide based on discussion of the transcripts. Double coding of three interviews resulted in a codebook. The codes were subsequently analysed through thematic analysis.

Interviews took place between December 2019 and February 2022. The most prevalent dementia subtype was Alzheimer’s (n=7). Four overarching themes, based on 21 categories, were derived from the interviews: (1) connectedness with others, (2) sense of dignity, (3) acceptance versus no acceptance of the impact of dementia, (4) concerning oneself with the future versus not wishing to concern oneself with the future. Connectedness with others and a sense of dignity were deemed prerequisites for (future) quality of life but were affected by YOD. These themes overlapped in terms of axial codes. Ambiguities were seen in the attitude towards the impact of YOD and the preparation for the future. The degree of acceptance of YOD affected the orientation towards the future.

Family and professional caregivers should discuss with people with YOD how to maintain connectedness with others and a sense of dignity. Opposite ways of coping with the present and future were found. Professional caregivers should take personal coping styles into account when starting ACP conversations.

To conceptualize a “good end of life” for people with dementia from the perspectives of bereaved family caregivers in Japan.

A qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews focused on the family caregivers’ perceptions of their loved one’s experiences. Family caregivers who had lost their relatives with dementia more than six months previously were recruited using maximum variation sampling by cultural subpopulation. A thematic analysis was conducted.

From 30 interviews held, four main themes emerged. A good end of life for people with dementia means experiencing a “Peaceful Death” while “Maintaining Personhood” at a “Preferred Place” allowing for feelings of “Life Satisfaction.” A “Preferred Place” emerged as a basic requirement to achieving a good end of life according to the three other themes, in particular, “Maintaining Personhood.” However, the interviewees experienced difficulties in ensuring that their loved ones stayed at a “Preferred Place.”

Despite different cultural backgrounds, perceptions of a good end of life with dementia were remarkably similar between Japan and Western countries. However, recent societal changes in family structures and long-term care access in Japan may explain the theme of a comfortable place taking a central position. We suggest that these themes be considered and translated into care goals. They could supplement established end-of-life care goals for quality of life in dementia, which aim to maximize functioning and increase comfort.

Ethics Committee of the Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University (R0808-2)

There are few studies on how professional caregivers apply the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) in nursing home care for people with dementia. Further, despite critiques in the United Kingdom, the LCP continues to be used in the Netherlands, while, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted since its implementation. The purpose of the present study was to analyze professional caregivers' experiences with the LCP in this context.

This article draws on an ethnographic study. Data collection was based on 4 months of ethnographic fieldwork in 2015 in 11 psychogeriatric units of a nursing home in a rural area of the Netherlands. Data collection included participant observation and 25 semistructured audiotaped interviews with specialist elderly care physicians, nursing staff, and a nurse practitioner.

We found that professional caregivers appreciate the LCP as a communication tool and as a reminder of care goals. However, the document was deemed too complicated and to cause duplication of work. It was also reported that the LCP did not cover the complexity of care needs that emerge in practice. Actual care needs were prioritized over the LCP, which calls its contribution into question.

Overall, the LCP does not match the context of dementia care in the nursing home. While it could be argued that the LCP does not intend to replace good care, its benefits as a reminder and a communication tool need continued consideration in relation to the amount of work it requires as a bureaucratic obligation.

Our aim was to describe physicians' perceptions of the suffering of their patients who are dying with dementia, many of whom are incompetent with regard to decision making and have difficulty with communicating about the source of their distress and with identifying related factors.

We analyzed data from the nationally representative observational Dutch End-of-Life in Dementia (DEOLD) cohort study (2007–2011), which involved 34 long-term care facilities. A total of 103 physicians completed questionnaires about 330 patients with dementia who had died in a participating facility. Suffering during the last six hours of life was defined as “a patient being disturbed by or aware of symptoms,” “suffering until the end or death was a struggle”—all related to objective indicators of lack of comfort. We employed generalized estimating equation models to assess associations of suffering with the characteristics of physicians and patients, the patient's death, and the decision-making process.

In 13.8% of cases, the physician felt that the patient had suffered. An unexpected death and death with pneumonia were strongly (an odds ratios close to 6) associated with suffering, and suffering was also independently associated with the physician's perception of worse quality of end-of-life care, death with cardiovascular disease, a less experienced physician, no palliative sedation, and a younger patient.

Most patients with dementia did not suffer during their final hours of life, according to their physicians. There are a number of factors associated with suffering, among them death with pneumonia and unexpected death. We may not be able to have much influence on death from pneumonia, but quality of care and an unexpected death are reasonable targets for intervention. Earlier identification of the beginning of the dying process would allow time to better prepare for approaching death, which would provide a source of comfort.

People with dementia may benefit from palliative care which specifically addresses the needs of patients and families affected by this life-limiting disease. On behalf of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), we recently performed a Delphi study to define domains for palliative care in dementia and to provide recommendations for optimal care. An international panel of experts in palliative care, dementia care or both, achieved consensus on almost all domains and recommendations, but the domain concerning the applicability of palliative care to dementia required revision.

To examine in detail, the opinions of the international panel of 64 experts around the applicability of palliative care, we explored feedback they provided in the Delphi process. To examine which experts found it less important or less applicable, ordinal regression analyses related characteristics of the panelists to ratings of overall importance of the applicability domain, and to agreement with the domain's four recommendations.

Some experts expressed concerns about bringing up end-of-life issues prematurely and about relabeling dementia care as palliative care. Multivariable analyses with the two outcomes of importance and agreement with applicability indicated that younger or less experienced experts and those whose expertise was predominantly in dementia care found palliative care in dementia less important and less applicable.

Benefits of palliative care in dementia are acknowledged by experts worldwide, but there is some controversy around its early introduction. Further studies should weigh concerns expressed around care receiving a “palliative” label versus the benefits of applying palliative care early.

Dementia involves a progressive decline in many functional areas. Policy and practice guidelines should cover the entire course of the disease from early detection to the end-of-life. The present study aimed to evaluate the contents of national dementia strategies with a focus on palliative care content.

We employed qualitative content analyses. Sixteen national dementia strategies from 14 countries were reviewed. Using open coding, the contents were compared to the domains and recommendations of the palliative care in dementia white paper of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC).

Although palliative care was not explicitly referred to in eight of the 14 countries and only to a limited extent in three countries, a number of domains from the EAPC white paper were well represented, including “person-centered care, communication, and shared decision making”; “continuity of care”; and “family care and involvement.” Three countries that referred to palliative care did so explicitly, with two domains being well represented: “education of the health care team”; and “societal and ethical issues.” The strategies all lacked reference to the domain of “prognostication and timely recognition of dying” and to spiritual caregiving.

National dementia strategies cover part of the recent definition of palliative care in dementia, although they do not frequently label these references as “palliative care.” In view of the growing numbers of people dying with dementia, preparation for the last phase of life should be added to national strategies.

Providing good quality care for the growing number of patients with dementia is a major challenge. There is little international comparative research on how people with dementia die in nursing homes. We compared the relative's judgment on quality of care at the end of life and quality of dying of nursing home residents with dementia in Belgium and the Netherlands.

This was a Belgian cross-sectional retrospective study (2010) combined with a prospective and retrospective study from the Netherlands (January 2007–July 2011). Relatives of deceased residents of 69 Belgian and 34 Dutch nursing homes were asked to complete questionnaires. We included 190 and 337 deceased nursing home residents with dementia in Belgium and the Netherlands, respectively.

Of all identified deceased nursing home residents with dementia, respectively 53.2% and 74.8% of their relatives in Belgium and the Netherlands responded. Comfort while dying (CAD-EOLD, range 14–42) was rated better for Dutch nursing home residents than for Belgian nursing homes residents (26.1 vs. 31.1, OR 4.5, CI 1.8–11.2). We found no differences between countries regarding Satisfaction With Care (SWC-EOLD, range 10–40, means 32.5 (the Netherlands) and 32.0 (Belgium)) or symptom frequency in the last month of life (SM-EOLD, range 0–45, means 26.4 (the Netherlands) and 27.2 (Belgium)).

Although nursing home structures differ between Belgium and the Netherlands, the quality of care in the last month of life for residents with dementia is similar according to their relatives. However, Dutch residents experience less discomfort while dying. The results suggest room for improved symptom management in both countries and particularly in the dying phase in Belgium.