People whose parents had dementia or memory impairment are at higher risk for later-life cognitive impairment themselves. One goal of our research is to identify factors that either increase the risk of or protect against family history of dementia over the life course. External locus of control has been associated with lower cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults. Previous findings have shown that adults racialized as Black have relatively high levels of external locus of control due to inequity and racism. We hypothesized that lower parental memory would be associated with lower offspring memory among Non-Latinx Black and Non-Latinx White (hereafter Black and White, respectively) adults; and associations would be stronger among participants with higher levels of external locus of control.

Participants comprised 594 adults racialized as Black or White (60.3% Black; 62% women; aged 56.1 ± 10.4; 15.3 ± 2.7 years of education) from the Offspring Study who are the adult children of participants in the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP). Parental memory was residualized for age (74.3 ± 6.0) and education (13.7 ± 3.1). Self-reported external locus of control was assessed using 8 items from the the perceived control questionnaire. Memory was assessed with the Selective Reminding Test, and a composite of total and delayed recall scores were computed. Linear regression quantified the interaction between parental memory and external locus of control on memory in models stratified by race, and adjusted for age, sex/gender, and number of chronic health diseases.

Among Black participants (n=358), there were no main effects of parental memory or locus of control on offspring memory. However, lower parental memory was associated with lower offspring memory among Black participants with high levels of external locus of control (standardized estimate=0.36, p=0.02, 95%CI [0.05, 0.67]). Associations were attenuated and non-significant at lower levels of control. Among White participants (n=236), there was a main effect of parental memory on offspring memory, and this association did not vary by levels of external locus of control.

Poor parental memory, which reflects risk for later-life cognitive impairment and dementia, was associated with lower memory performance among White middle-aged participants. Among Black participants, this association was observed among those with high levels of external locus of control only. Economic and social constraints shape levels of external locus of control and are disproportionately experienced by Black adults. In the face of greater external locus of control, a cascade of psychological and biological stress-related processes may be triggered and make Black adults’ memory function more vulnerable to the detrimental impact of parent-related dementia risk. Longitudinal analyses are needed to clarify temporal associations. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that reducing social and economic inequities disproportionately experienced by Black adults may dampen the effect of intergenerational transmission of dementia risk on cognition.

Socioeconomic disadvantage is a chronic stressor associated with several biological markers of health (e.g., inflammation) as well as early-onset cognitive aging. Studies examining socioeconomic status (SES) and its link with health outcomes exhibit no uniformity in the way in which SES is measured and defined. Also, studies have found that subjective socioeconomic status (SSES), defined by a subjective SES scale, was more consistently and strongly related to psychological functioning and health-related outcomes than objective socioeconomic status (OSES), defined by a composite score of education, household income, and occupation. The goal of the current study was to assess whether SSES mediates the relationship between OSES and neuropsychological test performance similarly across racial and ethnic groups.

Participants were 1,912 middle-aged older adults (13% non-Hispanic white, 17% non-Hispanic Black, 69% Hispanic/Latinx) from the Offspring study. Participants are the adult children of participants in the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project, a community-based cohort study of aging and dementia representing the ethnic/racial diversity of upper Manhattan. Participants on average were 56.5 years of age and 67% were women. Measures of verbal learning and memory (SRT immediate and delayed recall), verbal fluency (animal and letter fluency), and attention/working memory (digit span forward and backward) were administered. OSES was characterized by years of formal education completed. SSES was measured by the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. The scale measures perceptions of one’s social standing relative to others. We conducted separate stratified mediation analyses for each neuropsychological outcome across each racial and ethnic group. All models were adjusted for age.

Participants with higher OSES demonstrated higher neuropsychological test scores (effect size associations ranged from .29 to .45) and reported higher SSES (b=.109 95% CI: .08, .14). Lower SSES was associated with lower neuropsychological test scores (effect-size range .06 to .13). In stratified analyses, the relationship between OSES and SSES was strongest for White participants (b=.13 [.01, .24]) compared with Latinx (b=.06 [.02, .11]) and Black (b=.06 [-.03, .16]) participants. Associations between SSES and neuropsychological outcomes were only reliable for White participants on SRT Immediate and Delayed Recall and Animal Fluency and for Black participants on Digit Span Forward. In mediation analyses, SSES mediated the relationship between OSES and Immediate Recall (indirect effect b=.18 [.001, .45]; 39% mediated), Delayed Recall (indirect effect b=.05 [.004, .09]; 44% mediated), and Animal Fluency (indirect effect b=.09 [.01, .20]; 22% mediated) for White participants. There was no evidence of mediation in Black or Latinx participants.

The relationship between OSES and SSES was strongest for White participants compared to Black and Latinx participants. Even though perception of social status predicted lower cognitive test scores among Black and Latinx adults, it is only a part of the indirect pathway linking OSES to cognitive function among White adults. It is likely that mechanisms related to tangible resources that benefit health (as opposed to perceived inequity) are in the pathway linking education to cognition among Black and Latinx, and thus intervening on systems of inequality throughout the life course has the most promise for improving brain health in those communities.

Social support may protect against Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD), potentially through emotional or instrumental support elements. Black and Hispanic/Latinx older adults bear a disproportionate burden of ADRD. However, independent effects of emotional and instrumental support on cognition, a primary indicator of ADRD risk, are largely understudied in these groups. Guided by the differential vulnerability hypothesis – the theoretical framework which posits that systemic racism disadvantages Black and Hispanic/Latinx individuals’ health – we hypothesize that emotional and instrumental support may be particularly important to protect against worse cognition for Black and Hispanic/Latinx older adults, who often have fewer resources due to these inequalities (e.g., wealth, educational opportunities) to otherwise maintain health. Using the NIH Toolbox Emotion Module measures of emotional (e.g., the extent to which individuals can rely on others in challenging times) and instrumental support (e.g., the extent to which individuals can rely on others for assistance in daily activities), we aimed to identify positive social support factors (i.e., emotional and instrumental support) that may protect against ADRD risk (i.e., longitudinal executive function and memory performance) among Black and Hispanic/Latinx older adults.

Participants were 362 Black and 265 Hispanic/Latinx adults aged 65-89 (63% female, average age=75) from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) Study who completed baseline and up to two additional waves of assessments (every 1.5 years), including questionnaires, neuropsychological evaluations, and the NIH toolbox. Predictors included baseline covariates (i.e., age, language of test administration, gender, education, income, self-rated health) and NIH toolbox emotional and instrumental support variables. Outcomes were baseline and longitudinal memory (visual and verbal episodic memory) and executive functioning (verbal fluency and working memory) composites from the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales (SENAS). Latent growth curve models were conducted separately in Black and Hispanic/Latinx participants to estimate effects of emotional and instrumental support on baseline cognition and subsequent change in each domain.

Black participants reported greater emotional support. There were no group differences in levels of instrumental support. Greater instrumental support was associated with better initial memory (standardized β= .194, 95%CI: [.063, .325]) among Black participants but not among Hispanic/Latinx participants. In Hispanic/Latinx participants, greater emotional support was associated with better initial executive functioning (standardized β= .215, 95%CI: [.079, .350]. Emotional support was not associated with either cognitive domain in Black participants. There were no associations between emotional or instrumental support on cognitive change in either group.

Results point to differences between Black and Hispanic/Latinx older adults in the impact of specific aspects of social support on different cognitive domains. Positive associations between instrumental support and baseline memory in Black participants and between emotional support and executive functioning in Hispanic/Latinx participants suggest unique cognitive consequences of social support across groups. Differences in the role of specific types of social supports may be useful in identifying intervention targets specifically for Black and Hispanic/Latinx older adults, who are disproportionately affected by ADRD. Future research will examine these constructs using multiple group models to test these associations more rigorously.

The AD8 is a validated screening instrument for functional changes that may be caused by cognitive decline and dementia. It is frequently used in clinics and research studies because it is short and easy to administer, with a cut off score of 2 out of 8 items recommended to maximize sensitivity and specificity. This cutoff assumes that all 8 items provide equivalent “information” about everyday functioning. In this study, we used item response theory (IRT) to test this assumption. To determine the relevance of this measure of everyday functioning in men and women, and across race, ethnicity, and education, we conducted differential item functioning (DIF) analysis to test for item bias.

Data came from the 2021 follow up of the High School & Beyond cohort (N=8,690; mean age 57.5 ± 1.2; 55% women), a nationally representative, longitudinal study of Americans who were first surveyed in 1980 when they were in the 10th or 12th grade. Participants were asked AD8 questions about their own functioning via phone or internet survey. First, we estimated a one-parameter (i.e., differing difficulty, equal discrimination across items) and two-parameter IRT model (i.e., differing difficulty and differing discrimination across items). We compared model fit using a likelihood-ratio test. Second, we tested for uniform and non-uniform DIF on AD8 items by sex, race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic), education level (high school or less, some college, BA degree or more), and survey mode (phone or internet). We examined DIF salience by comparing the difference between original and DIF-adjusted AD8 scores to the standard error of measurement of the original score.

The two-parameter IRT model fit the data significantly better than the one-parameter model, indicating that some items were more strongly related to underlying everyday functional ability than others. For example, the “problems with judgment” item had higher discrimination (more information) than the “less interest in hobbies/activities” item. There were significant differences in item endorsement by race/ethnicity, education, and survey mode. We found significant uniform and non-uniform DIF on several items across each of these groups. For example, for a given level of functional decline (theta) White participants were more likely to endorse “Daily problems with thinking/memory” than Black and Hispanic participants. The DIF was salient (i.e., caused AD8 scores to change by greater than the standard error of measurement for a large portion of respondents) for those with a college degree and phone respondents.

In a population representative sample of Americans ∼age 57, the items on the AD8 contributed differing levels of discrimination along the range of everyday functioning that is impacted by later life cognitive impairment. This suggests that a simple cut-off or summed score may not be appropriate since some items yield more information about the underlying construct than others. Furthermore, we observed significant and salient DIF on several items by education and survey mode, AD8 scores should not be compared across education groups and assessment modes without adjustment for this measurement bias.

Cross-national neuropsychological research is needed to understand the social, economic, and cultural factors associated with cognitive risk and resilience across global aging populations. Memory and language have been shown to be sensitive to age-related cognitive decline and pathological cognitive aging processes and may be more sensitive to subtle cognitive decline than measures of global cognitive function. Thus, we aimed to derive and validate harmonized cognitive domain scores for memory and language across population-based studies in the US and Mexico.

Data came from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) and the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) Ancillary Study on Cognitive Aging (Mex-Cog). We used confirmatory factor analysis methodology to create statistically co-calibrated cognitive domains of memory and language. We performed differential item functioning (DIF) analysis to evaluate measurement differences across studies, using a cultural neuropsychological approach to identify comparable items across studies (i.e., cross-study anchors). We evaluated harmonized scores by examining their relationship to age and education in each study.

We included 3347 participants from the HRS-HCAP study [Mage=76.6(7.5), 60% female] and 2042 participants from the Mex-Cog study [Mage=68.1(9.0), 59% female]. Education was classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education in the following categories (HRS-HCAP and Mex-Cog, respectively): none or early childhood education: (0.7%; 50.5%), primary education (4.1%; 22.3%), lower secondary education (7.1%; 15.7%), upper secondary education (41.1%; 3.0%), and any college (47.1%; 8.5%). DIF analyses revealed that 5 out of the 7 memory items and 1 out of the 12 language items demonstrated statistical evidence of measurement differences across studies, meaning that these items measured each underlying cognitive construct differently across studies. After adjusting for DIF by not allowing the items with DIF to be cross-study anchors, harmonized memory and language scores showed generally the expected associations with age and education in each study. Increasing age was associated with lower memory (r=-0.40 in HRS-HCAP; r=-0.44 in Mex-Cog) and language (r=-0.31 in HRS-HCAP and r=-0.67 in Mex-Cog) scores. Increasing years of education was associated with better memory and language scores, with mean scores ranging from z=-0.86 and z=-0.29 among those with a primary education or lower to z=0.33 and z=0.90 among those with any college, for HRS-HCAP and Mex-Cog, respectively.

A cultural neuropsychology approach to statistical harmonization facilitates the generation of harmonized measures of cognitive functioning in cross-national studies. Future work can utilize these harmonized cognitive scores to investigate determinants of late-life cognitive decline and dementia in the US and Mexico.

Non-Hispanic Black older adults experience a disproportionate burden of Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (ADRD) risk compared to non-Hispanic White older adults. It is necessary to identify mechanisms that may be contributing to inequities in cognitive aging. Psychosocial stressors that disproportionately affect Black adults (e.g., discrimination) have the potential to impact brain health through stress pathways. The brain’s white matter, which appears to be particularly important for ADRD risk among Black older adults, may be uniquely vulnerable to stress-related physiological dysfunction. To further understand whether and how discrimination can affect ADRD risk, this study aimed to examine associations between multiple forms of racial discrimination and white matter integrity, operationalized through diffusion tensor imaging.

Cross-sectional data were obtained from 190 non-Hispanic Black residents aged 65+ without dementia in northern Manhattan. Racial discrimination was self-reported using the Everyday Discrimination and Major Experiences of Lifetime Discrimination scales. Example items from the Everyday Discrimination Scale include: “You are treated with less respect than other people”; “You are called names or insulted.” Example items from the Major Experiences of Lifetime Discrimination Scale include: “At any time in your life, have you ever been unfairly fired from a job?”; “Have you ever been unfairly denied a bank loan?” Racial discrimination was operationalized as experiences attributed to “race” or “skin color.” White matter integrity was assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) via diffusion tensor imaging. Multivariable regression models evaluated the unique effects of everyday and major experiences of lifetime racial discrimination on mean FA in the whole brain and specific regions. Initial models controlled for age, sex/gender, intracranial volume, and white matter hyperintensities. Subsequent models additionally controlled for socioeconomic and health factors to consider potential confounders or mediators of the relationship between discrimination and white matter integrity.

Major experiences of lifetime discrimination were negatively associated with mean FA within the left cingulum cingulate gyrus and the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. These associations persisted when controlling for additional covariates (i.e., education, depression, and cardiovascular diseases). In contrast, major experiences of lifetime discrimination were positively associated with mean FA within the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (temporal part). This association was attenuated when controlling for additional covariates. Everyday racial discrimination was not associated with mean FA in any regions.

These results extend prior work linking racial discrimination to brain health and provide evidence for both risk and resilience among Black older adults. Major experiences of lifetime racial discrimination, a proxy for institutional racism, may have a stronger effect on white matter integrity than everyday racial discrimination, a proxy for interpersonal racism. Educational opportunities and cardiovascular risk factors may represent mediators between racial discrimination and white matter integrity. White matter integrity within specific brain regions may be a mechanism through which racially patterned social stressors contribute to racial disparities in ADRD. Future research should characterize within-group heterogeneity in order to identify factors that promote resilience among Black older adults.

Higher education is strongly associated with better cognitive function in older adults. Previous research has also showed that positive psychosocial factors, such as selfefficacy and emotional and instrumental support, are beneficial for late-life cognition. There is prior evidence of a buffering effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between educational disadvantage and poor cognition in older adults, however it is not known if other psychosocial factors modify the schooling-cognition relationship. We hypothesized that higher levels of emotional and instrumental support will diminish the association between lower education and lower cognitive test scores among older adults.

553 older adults without dementia (42.1% non-Latinx Black, 32.2% non-Latinx White, 25.7% Latinx; 63.2% women; average age 74.4 (SD 4.3)) from the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project. Neuropsychological tests assessed four cognitive domains (language, memory, psychomotor processing speed, and visuospatial function). Self-reported emotional and instrumental support were assessed with measures from NIH Toolbox. Linear regression estimated interactions between education and the two support measures on cognition in models stratified by cognitive domain and racial and ethnic group. Covariates included age, sex/gender, and chronic health conditions (e.g. heart disease, stroke, cancer, etc.).

Education was associated with cognition across racial and ethnic groups. For every one year of schooling, the processing speed z-score composite was 0.33 higher among Latinx participants, 0.10 among non-Latinx Black participants, and 0.03 higher among non-Latinx White participants. The education-cognition relationship was generally similar across cognitive domains with larger effects in non-Latinx Black and Latinx participants than in White participants. Low education was associated with slower processing speed among Black participants with low emotional support (B = 0.224, 95% CI [0.014, 0.096]), but there was no association between low education and processing speed among Black older adults with high levels of emotional support (beta for interaction = -.142, 95% CI [-0.061, -0.001]). A similar pattern of results was observed for instrumental support (beta for interaction = -.207, 95% CI [-0.064, 0.010]). There were no interactions between support and education on other cognitive domains or among Latinx and White participants.

We found that higher levels of emotional and instrumental support attenuate the detrimental effect of educational disadvantages on processing speed in older Black adults. This may occur via benefits of social capital, which provides access to health resources and knowledge, increased social interaction, an emotional outlet allowing the ability to better cope with stress. Longitudinal analyses are needed to examine temporal patterns of associations. In addition, improving equitable access to high quality schools will improve later-life cognitive outcomes for future generations of older adults. However, for the growing number of Black older adults who will not experience the benefits of structural improvements in the education system, emotional and instrumental support may represent a modifiable psychosocial factor to reduce their disproportionate burden of cognitive morbidity.

In the U.S, Black and Latinx individuals disproportionately experience daily acts of discrimination. To counteract the psychological distress, many individuals develop coping mechanisms, like vigilant coping, where behaviors are modified to attempt to prevent discriminatory experiences. Researchers have investigated how coping mechanisms moderate the relationship between discrimination and psychological stress, but not their role in the relationship between discrimination and cognitive function. Prior research has shown a link between discrimination and poor episodic memory. The current study examined vigilant coping as a potential moderator in the relationship between discrimination and memory among Black and Latinx people.

We partnered with 1317 non-Latinx Black (n= 291) and Latinx (n= 1026) individuals who participated in the Offspring Study of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease. Participants were assessed in English or Spanish, according to their preference. Experiences of discrimination were measured on two scales: Major (civil rights violations) and Everyday (daily hassles), and were coded according to yearly chronicity. Vigilance was measured among people with at least one reported experience of discrimination on either scale, using a 5-item survey which was dichotomized as low and high vigilant coping. The Selective Reminding Test, a 12-item word list task with 6 learning trials and a delayed recall trial, yielded scores for total immediate recall and delayed memory. Linear regression models were used to assess if vigilance moderated the relationship between discrimination and memory, with years of education and age as covariates.

Participants ranged in age from 27 to 91, with a mean age of 56.5 (SD=11.0) years, a mean education of 12.7 (SD=3.7) years, and were 67% women. High vigilant coping was associated with more experiences of major (b = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.9,2.5) and everyday (b = 90.3, 95% CI=66.2,114.3) discrimination. Memory was not associated with reported everyday discrimination, but lower delayed recall was observed among people who reported more experiences of major discrimination (b= -0.04, 95% CI = -0.07,-0.01). This relationship was moderated by vigilance, such that among people with low vigilant coping, major experiences of discrimination predicted lower memory (b= -0.06, 95% CI = -0.12,-0.01), but the association between discrimination and memory was weakened among people with high use of vigilant coping (b= -0.02, 95% CI = -0.05,0.01).

This study builds on Black researchers' work that laid the foundations for examination of stress and coping in marginalized populations. Future studies on discrimination and cognitive health should consider coping mechanisms as key aspects of pathways linking structural racism and inequalities to cognitive health among Black and Latinx individuals.

Neuropsychology is in a nascent stage of understanding the mechanisms that link social forces, psychosocial experiences, and brain health. Discrimination is associated with lower quality of life, higher stress, and worse physical health outcomes in Latinx, but contradictory findings in prior research complicate our understanding of its relationship to cognition. These contradictory results may be explained by heterogeneity within the broad category of Latinx, a cultural identity that requires more nuanced conceptualization. Immigration status is a primary social identifier for Latinx people that carries significant stigma. However, prior research found enculturation promotes better physical and mental health outcomes in immigrants compared to their US-born counterparts, which may protect immigrant Latinx from the cognitive costs of discrimination. The current study hypothesized that the effect of discrimination on cognition will be stronger in US-born Latinx compared to immigrant Latinx.

We partnered with 1,023 neurologically healthy, community dwelling Latinx adults (M age=56.1(±10.7); M education=12.5(±3.7); 69% women) in a prospective cohort study in NYC investigating risks factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Immigration status was determined by self-report of birthplace. Measures of attention, language, and memory were administered by bilingual examiners in the participants’ self-selected preferred language of English (n = 388) or Spanish (n=635). Discrimination, measured with the Everyday Discrimination Scale and Major Experiences of Discrimination Scale, was chronicity coded to weigh experiences of discrimination according to yearly chronicity. Linear regression models were employed for US-born and immigrant participants to assess the relationship between both discrimination measures and each cognitive measure.

Compared to US-born Latinx (n = 224), immigrant Latinx (n = 799; primarily from the Dominican Republic) were older, had fewer years of school, had lower income, and were much more likely to have chosen to be assessed in Spanish. Immigrants reported experiencing significantly fewer everyday and major experiences of discrimination than nonimmigrants. In unadjusted models, discrimination did not predict cognitive performance among US-born Latinx. Among immigrant Latinx, more major experiences of discrimination across the lifetime predicted better phonemic (F(2,362) = 4.167, p<0.05, R2=0.017) and semantic fluency (F(2,362) = 3.304, p<0.05, R2=0.013) but was not associated with measures of attention or memory.

Discrimination is an important life stressor for Latinx people living in the US, particularly when its impact is summed across intersectional identities. The current study is among the first to explore the potential cognitive impact of discrimination within a group of Latinx adults. The described relationship between discrimination and language performance in this cohort may be confounded by the language in which cognitive tests were administered. Future studies should consider how discrimination measures may be limited in their ability to accurately capture the experiences of US-born and immigrant Latinx groups and expand the measurement of cognition to additional domains.

The Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) describes an assessment battery and a family of population-representative studies measuring neuropsychological performance. We describe the factorial structure of the HCAP battery in the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

The HCAP battery was compiled from existing measures by a cross-disciplinary and international panel of researchers. The HCAP battery was used in the 2016 wave of the HRS. We used factor analysis methods to assess and refine a theoretically driven single and multiple domain factor structure for tests included in the HCAP battery among 3,347 participants with evaluable performance data.

For the eight domains of cognitive functioning identified (orientation, memory [immediate, delayed, and recognition], set shifting, attention/speed, language/fluency, and visuospatial), all single factor models fit reasonably well, although four of these domains had either 2 or 3 indicators where fit must be perfect and is not informative. Multidimensional models suggested the eight-domain model was overly complex. A five-domain model (orientation, memory delayed and recognition, executive functioning, language/fluency, visuospatial) was identified as a reasonable model for summarizing performance in this sample (standardized root mean square residual = 0.05, root mean square error of approximation = 0.05, confirmatory fit index = 0.94).

The HCAP battery conforms adequately to a multidimensional structure of neuropsychological performance. The derived measurement models can be used to operationalize notions of neurocognitive impairment, and as a starting point for prioritizing pre-statistical harmonization and evaluating configural invariance in cross-national research.

To compare longitudinal verbal fluency performance among Latinx Spanish speakers who develop Alzheimer’s disease to those who do not develop dementia in absolute number of words produced on each task and their ratio to combine both scores.

Participants included 833 Latinx Spanish-speaking older adults from a community-based prospective cohort in Manhattan. We performed growth curve modeling to investigate the trajectories of letter and semantic fluency, and their ratio (i.e., ‘semantic index’), between individuals who developed Alzheimer’s disease and those who did not (i.e., controls). The semantic index quantifies the proportion of words generated for semantic fluency in relation to the total verbal fluency performance.

Letter fluency performance did not decline in controls; we observed a linear decline in those who developed Alzheimer’s disease. Semantic fluency declined in both groups and showed an increased rate of change over time in the incident Alzheimer’s disease group; in comparison, the control group had a linear and slower decline. There were no group differences in the longitudinal trajectory (intercept and slope) of the semantic index.

A decline in letter fluency and a more rapid and accelerating decline over time in semantic fluency distinguished people who developed Alzheimer’s disease from controls. Using the semantic index was not a superior marker of incident Alzheimer’s disease compared to examining the two fluency scores individually. Results suggest the differential decline in verbal fluency tasks, when evaluated appropriately, may be useful for early identification of Alzheimer’s disease in Latinx Spanish speakers, a historically understudied population.

To estimate the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its subtypes and investigate the impact of midlife cardiovascular risk factors on late-life MCI among the aging Mexican population.

Analyses included a sample of non-demented adults over the age of 55 living in both urban and rural areas of Mexico (N = 1807). MCI diagnosis was assigned based on a comprehensive cognitive assessment assessing the domains of memory, executive functioning, language, and visuospatial ability. The normative sample was selected by means of the robust norms approach. Cognitive impairment was defined by a 1.5-SD cut-off per cognitive domain using normative corrections for age, years of education, and sex. Risk factors included age, education, sex, rurality, depression, insurance status, workforce status, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, and heart disease.

The prevalence of amnestic MCI was 5.9%. Other MCI subtypes ranged from 4.2% to 7.7%. MCI with and without memory impairment was associated with older age (OR = 1.01 [1.01, 1.05]; OR = 1.03 [1.01, 1.04], respectively) and residing in rural areas (OR = 1.49 [1.08, 2.06]; OR = 1.35 [1.03, 1.77], respectively). Depression (OR = 1.07 [1.02, 1.12]), diabetes (OR = 1.37 [1.03, 1.82]), and years of education (OR = 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]) were associated with MCI without memory impairment. Midlife CVD increased the odds of MCI in late-life (OR = 1.76 [1.19, 2.59], which was driven by both midlife hypertension and diabetes (OR = 1.70 [1.18, 2.44]; OR = 1.88 [1.19, 2.97], respectively).

Older age, depression, low education, rurality, and midlife hypertension and diabetes were associated with higher risk of late-life MCI among older adults in Mexico. Our findings suggest that the causes of cognitive impairment are multifactorial and vary by MCI subtype.

Stress is a risk factor for numerous negative health outcomes, including cognitive impairment in late-life. The negative association between stress and cognition may be mediated by depressive symptoms, which separate studies have identified as both a consequence of perceived stress and a risk factor for cognitive decline. Pathways linking perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and cognition may be moderated by sociodemographics and psychosocial resources. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to identify modifying factors and enhance understanding of the mechanisms underlying the stress–cognition association in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of older adults.

A linear regression estimated the association between perceived stress and episodic memory in 578 older adults (Mage = 74.58) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project. Subsequent models tested whether depressive symptoms mediated the stress–memory relationship and whether sociodemographics (gender, race, and ethnicity) or perceived control moderated these pathways.

Independent of sociodemographics and chronic diseases, greater perceived stress was associated with worse episodic memory. This relationship was mediated by more depressive symptoms. Higher perceived control buffered the association between stress and depressive symptoms. There was no significant moderation by gender, race, or ethnicity.

Depressive symptoms may play a role in the negative association between perceived stress and cognition among older adults; however, longitudinal analyses and studies using experimental designs are needed. Perceived control is a modifiable psychological resource that may offset the negative impact of stress.

Previous cross-sectional studies have documented associations between positive psychosocial factors, such as self-efficacy and emotional support, and late-life cognition. Further, the magnitudes of concurrent associations may differ across racial and ethnic groups that differ in Alzheimer’s disease risk. The goals of this longitudinal study were to characterize prospective associations between positive psychosocial factors and cognitive decline and explicitly test for differential impact across race and ethnicity.

578 older adults (42% non-Hispanic Black, 31% non-Hispanic White, and 28% Hispanic) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project completed cognitive and psychosocial measures from the NIH Toolbox and standard neuropsychological tests over 2.4 years. Latent difference scores were used to model associations between positive psychosocial factors and cognitive decline controlling for baseline cognition, sociodemographics, depressive symptoms, physical health, and other positive psychosocial factors. Multiple-group modeling was used to test interactions between the positive psychosocial factors and race/ethnicity.

Higher NIH Toolbox Friendship scores predicted less episodic memory decline. One standard deviation increase in friendship corresponded to 6 fewer years of memory aging. This association did not significantly differ across racial/ethnic groups.

This longitudinal study provides support for the potential importance of friendships for subsequent episodic memory trajectories among older adults from three ethnic groups. Further study into culturally informed interventions is needed to investigate whether and how friend networks may be targeted to promote cognitive health in late life.

Hispanics/Latinos are the largest and fastest-growing minority population in the United States. To facilitate appropriate outcome assessment of this expanding population, the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function® (NIH Toolbox®) was developed with particular attention paid to the cultural and linguistic needs of English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos.

A Cultural Working Group ensured that all included measures were appropriate for use with Hispanics/Latinos in both English and Spanish. In addition, a Spanish Language Working Group assessed all English-language NIH Toolbox measures for translatability.

Measures were translated following the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation methodology for instances where language interpretation could impact scores, or a modified version thereof for more simplified translations. The Spanish versions of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery language measures (i.e., Picture Vocabulary Test, Oral Reading Recognition Test) were developed independently of their English counterparts.

The Spanish-language version of the NIH Toolbox provides a much-needed set of tools that can be selected as appropriate to complement existing protocols being conducted with the growing Hispanic/Latino population in the United States.