We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Because of the dearth of research examining the involvement of psychosocial factors in acute pelvic pain, this chapter focuses on chronic pain in the pelvic region, excluding abdominal pain. Although remarkably common in the female population, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) constitutes a broad and poorly-defined diagnostic category. Indeed, a recent survey of published studies noted that over 90% of investigators did not specify anatomical locations of pain beyond noting that it was ‘in the pelvic region’, and approximately three-quarters of published CPP studies included no information on whether physical pathology was present (Williams et al., 2004).
The most commonly utilized definition of CPP; ‘recurrent or constant pain in the lower abdominal region that has lasted for at least 6 months’, ignores aetiology (Zondervan & Barlow, 2000). The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has also promulgated a definition for CPP without obvious pathology, but such terms have been criticized for drawing an artificial distinction between organic and non-organic pain (Grace, 2000). Current conceptualizations of pain generally utilize the IASP's definition of pain as ‘an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage’ (International Association for the Study of Pain, 1979). This inclusion of affect in the definition of pain has largely abolished old distinctions between ‘organic’ and ‘functional’ pain.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.