Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • X-Ray Diffraction Data for SnO2. An Illustration of the New Powder Data Evaluation Methods

  • Gregory J. McCarthy, Jean M. Welton
  • Journal:
    Powder Diffraction / Volume 4 / Issue 3 / September 1989
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 January 2013, pp. 156-159

  • The Powder Diffraction File (PDF) X-ray diffraction pattern for SnO2 (cassiterite, syn), determined in the early 1950's at the National Bureau of Standards, was evaluated using the NBS*AIDS83 editorial review program and a calculated powder pattern. Systematic errors in d-spacings and relative intensities were attributed to the lack of an iterative least-squares refinement of unit cell parameters, to inadequate precision in reporting d-spacings, to poor sensitivity to high angle reflections, and to detector dead time. A new SnO2 pattern was prepared and used to illustrate criteria for evaluation of powder patterns. An R-Factor for quantifying agreement between observed and calculated relative intensities was utilized. The systematic errors in the earlier pattern occurred at higher angles and did not hinder its usefulness for identification purposes.