Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

35 results

Page 1 of 2

  • 9 - Can Blacklisting Reduce Terrorist Attacks?

  • from Part III - Beyond and Within State
  • Edited by Judith G. Kelley, Duke University, North Carolina, Beth A. Simmons, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book:
    The Power of Global Performance Indicators
    Published online:
    28 February 2020
    Print publication:
    19 March 2020, pp 271-299

  • Summary

    Within global security governance, a number of governments monitor and label certain organizations as “terrorist groups” with the aim of curtailing their capacity. The most prominent example of this is the U.S. Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list. Under what conditions is FTO listing an effective counterterrorism tool? We develop a theory of blacklisting in the context of FTOs, arguing that the impact of FTO designation depends on the types of support terrorist organizations rely on. We theorize that FTO blacklisting has capacity-curtailing effects on terrorist groups when funding sources are vulnerable to detection, sanctions, and stigmatization. Specifically, we hypothesize that groups with private funding (e.g. charities, diaspora networks) are more likely to reduce attacks after FTO designation, compared to groups with other funding sources such as criminal activities. Analysis of data on terrorist organizations between 1970 and 2014 takes into account the political processes of listing and provides support for the argument. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the nature of the target in evaluating the performance of global indicators.

  • Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?—CORRIGENDUM

  • Hyeran Jo, Beth A. Simmons
  • Journal:
    International Organization / Volume 71 / Issue 2 / Spring 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 May 2017, pp. 419-421
    Print publication:
    Spring 2017
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?

  • Hyeran Jo, Beth A. Simmons
  • Journal:
    International Organization / Volume 70 / Issue 3 / Summer 2016
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 July 2016, pp. 443-475
    Print publication:
    Summer 2016

  • Whether and how violence can be controlled to spare innocent lives is a central issue in international relations. The most ambitious effort to date has been the International Criminal Court (ICC), designed to enhance security and safety by preventing egregious human rights abuses and deterring international crimes. We offer the first systematic assessment of the ICC's deterrent effects for both state and nonstate actors. Although no institution can deter all actors, the ICC can deter some governments and those rebel groups that seek legitimacy. We find support for this conditional impact of the ICC cross-nationally. Our work has implications for the study of international relations and institutions, and supports the violence-reducing role of pursuing justice in international affairs.

Page 1 of 2