Parents of children with skin conditions can experience stress from the additional responsibilities of care. However, there is a lack of psychological interventions for families affected by a dermatological diagnosis.

To investigate (1) whether delivering the ‘Living in the Present’ mindfulness curriculum to parents of children with skin conditions reduced stress and increased both parental/child quality of life (QoL), and (2) determine intervention acceptability.

Ten parents of children with eczema, ectodermal dysplasia, ichthyosis, and alopecia took part in a mindfulness-based intervention. Using mixed methods, a single-group experimental case design (SCED) was conducted and supplemented by thematic analysis of exit interviews. Parents completed idiographic measures of parenting stress, standardised measures of QoL, stress, mindfulness, and took part in exit interviews. Children also completed QoL measures.

Tau-U analysis of idiographic measures revealed three parents showed some significant improvements in positive targets, and five parents showed some significant improvements in negative targets. Assessment of reliable change demonstrated that: one parent showed improvement in mindful parenting, three parents showed improvement in parenting stress, seven parents showed improvement in anxiety, three parents showed improvements in depression, six parents showed improvement in QoL, and four children showed improvement in QoL. However, two parents showed increased anxiety. Thematic analysis revealed positive changes to mood following mindfulness, although challenges were highlighted, including sustaining home practice.

Findings suggest this specific form of mindfulness intervention could be effective for parents of children with skin conditions; however, further robust studies are needed.

We identify a set of essential recent advances in climate change research with high policy relevance, across natural and social sciences: (1) looming inevitability and implications of overshooting the 1.5°C warming limit, (2) urgent need for a rapid and managed fossil fuel phase-out, (3) challenges for scaling carbon dioxide removal, (4) uncertainties regarding the future contribution of natural carbon sinks, (5) intertwinedness of the crises of biodiversity loss and climate change, (6) compound events, (7) mountain glacier loss, (8) human immobility in the face of climate risks, (9) adaptation justice, and (10) just transitions in food systems.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Reports provides the scientific foundation for international climate negotiations and constitutes an unmatched resource for researchers. However, the assessment cycles take multiple years. As a contribution to cross- and interdisciplinary understanding of climate change across diverse research communities, we have streamlined an annual process to identify and synthesize significant research advances. We collected input from experts on various fields using an online questionnaire and prioritized a set of 10 key research insights with high policy relevance. This year, we focus on: (1) the looming overshoot of the 1.5°C warming limit, (2) the urgency of fossil fuel phase-out, (3) challenges to scale-up carbon dioxide removal, (4) uncertainties regarding future natural carbon sinks, (5) the need for joint governance of biodiversity loss and climate change, (6) advances in understanding compound events, (7) accelerated mountain glacier loss, (8) human immobility amidst climate risks, (9) adaptation justice, and (10) just transitions in food systems. We present a succinct account of these insights, reflect on their policy implications, and offer an integrated set of policy-relevant messages. This science synthesis and science communication effort is also the basis for a policy report contributing to elevate climate science every year in time for the United Nations Climate Change Conference.

We highlight recent and policy-relevant advances in climate change research – with input from more than 200 experts.

Recent evidence from case reports suggests that a ketogenic diet may be effective for bipolar disorder. However, no clinical trials have been conducted to date.

To assess the recruitment and feasibility of a ketogenic diet intervention in bipolar disorder.

Euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder were recruited to a 6–8 week trial of a modified ketogenic diet, and a range of clinical, economic and functional outcome measures were assessed. Study registration number: ISRCTN61613198.

Of 27 recruited participants, 26 commenced and 20 completed the modified ketogenic diet for 6–8 weeks. The outcomes data-set was 95% complete for daily ketone measures, 95% complete for daily glucose measures and 95% complete for daily ecological momentary assessment of symptoms during the intervention period. Mean daily blood ketone readings were 1.3 mmol/L (s.d. = 0.77, median = 1.1) during the intervention period, and 91% of all readings indicated ketosis, suggesting a high degree of adherence to the diet. Over 91% of daily blood glucose readings were within normal range, with 9% indicating mild hypoglycaemia. Eleven minor adverse events were recorded, including fatigue, constipation, drowsiness and hunger. One serious adverse event was reported (euglycemic ketoacidosis in a participant taking SGLT2-inhibitor medication).

The recruitment and retention of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder to a 6–8 week ketogenic diet intervention was feasible, with high completion rates for outcome measures. The majority of participants reached and maintained ketosis, and adverse events were generally mild and modifiable. A future randomised controlled trial is now warranted.

Music therapy can lift mood and reduce agitation for people living with dementia (PwD) in community and residential care settings, potentially reducing the prevalence of distress behaviours. However, less is known about the impact of music therapy on in-patient psychiatric wards for PwD.

To investigate the impact of music therapy on two in-patient psychiatric wards for PwD.

A mixed-methods design was used. Statistical analysis was conducted on incidents involving behaviours reported as ‘disruptive and aggressive’ in 2020, when music therapy delivery varied because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured interviews conducted online with three music therapists and eight ward-based staff were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Quantitative findings showed a significant reduction in the frequency of behaviours reported as disruptive and aggressive on days with in-person music therapy (every 14 days) than on the same weekday with no or online music therapy (every 3.3 or 3.1 days, respectively). Qualitative findings support this, with music therapy reported by music therapists and staff members to be accessible and meaningful, lifting mood and reducing agitation, with benefits potentially lasting throughout the day and affecting the ward environment.

We identified a significant reduction in the occurrence of distress behaviours on days with in-person music therapy when compared with no music therapy. Music therapy was reported to be a valuable intervention, supporting patient mood and reducing agitation. Interventional studies are needed to investigate the impact of music therapy and its optimum mode of delivery.

This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a staff communication tool, ‘the morning huddle’, to Goddington ward (Green Parks House, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust). The huddle's purpose was to share key information between members of the ward's multidisciplinary team (MDT) regarding patient risk, diagnosis, mental state and treatment progress.

The project team worked with the Oxleas Quality Improvement (QI) team to create a structured huddle with agreed goals that commenced at 9am each morning. The team sought views from ward staff on the existing communication process before implementing the huddle via a series of weekly questionnaires. The morning huddle was introduced on 26th May 2020 and all members of the team were invited (including the ward consultant, junior doctors, ward manager, nursing staff, healthcare assistants, psychologists, occupational therapist, and ward administrator).

Following multiple PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles, the team further refined the morning huddle into a meeting with a set template that included COVID-19 test results, psychiatric risk concerns, medication adherence, and barriers to discharge. The project team also timed the huddle, aiming for it to last a maximum of 30 minutes. A questionnaire was distributed to ward staff weekly after the huddle was implemented to ascertain their views on the process. Data collection for the project ended on 2nd August 2020.

The project's main outcomes were based on two questions from the weekly staff questionnaire:

1. “How effective did staff members find the morning huddle in addressing their concerns about patients and promoting safety of patients and staff?”

This improved over the course of the project, starting with 20% of staff finding the huddle “good” or “very good” in its effectiveness to 77% finding it “good” or “very good” in the final questionnaire.

2. “How effectively do staff feel that their concerns about patients are addressed by the rest of the team?”

This also improved, starting with 40% of staff selecting “well” or “very well” to 100% in the final questionnaire.

Goddington ward introduced a huddle that was valued by the entire MDT. The huddle improved how well staff felt their concerns about patients were addressed and a noticeable improvement in team morale was observed. While the project succeeded in implementing a huddle that staff appreciated, patient outcomes also need to be considered in future

Food literacy is the knowledge, skills and behaviours needed to meet food needs and determine intake and is conceptualised as eleven components under four domains of planning and managing, selecting, preparing, and eating. Previous measures of food literacy vary in their adherence to the conceptualisation and ability to capture totality of eating. This study aimed to determine items for inclusion and exclusion in a food literacy item pool and capture the general public’s interpretation of everyday food literacy practices.

Beginning with an item pool from previous studies, cognitive interviews were conducted using think-aloud and verbal probing methods. Data were first analysed for applicability, clarity, ambiguity and logic, then for emergent themes to ensure items captured the totality of the participant’s eating.

Australia

Australian residents over 18 years of age recruited via Facebook residential groups (n 20).

Of the original 116 items, 11 items had limited applicability; 13 items had unclear references; 32 items had lexical problems and 11 items had logical problems. In total, 29 items were deleted, 31 retained and 56 revised. Thematic analysis revealed participants limited their responses to consider only conventional practices such as grocery shopping, cooking and planned meals rather than the totality of their eating. An additional eighty-four items were developed to address eating out, incidental eating occasions and inconsistencies between participants assumed correct knowledge and that of public health guidelines. This resulted in a refined 171-item pool.

This study progresses the development towards a comprehensive, validated food literacy questionnaire.

The aim of this quality improvement project is to improve identification and management of mood disorder in patients over 65 years admitted to Royal Surrey County Hospital (RSCH) with hip fractures by introducing a standardised assessment tool to guide appropriate interventions.

The signs of depression in the elderly can be subtle and often go unnoticed. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) at RSCH observed that low mood could negatively impact on a patient's recovery, affecting pain thresholds and leading to poor engagement with rehabilitation. Proactive identification and management of mood disorder is an important part of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment but not routinely performed in patients with hip fracture admitted to RSCH.

Notes and discharge summaries of patients with hip fracture admitted over a four-month period were retrospectively reviewed to establish if patients were screened for low mood. A mood screening tool was chosen and implemented prospectively over a four-month period. Occupational therapists and junior doctors completed a Cornell Score for all patinets. Those identified with depression or probable depression were issued verbal advice, an information leaflet and follow-up arranged.

Ninety-eight patients were included in the retrospective cohort. No patients were formally identified as having depression or probable depression, and there was no indication that mood was considered or assessed at any point during admission. During the four-month prospective period, 90 patients were admitted to RSCH with hip fracture and 86 patients (96%) were screened for low mood. Four patients were excluded due to a terminal prognosis. Of the patients screened, 9% had major depression and 16% probable depression. Feedback from our occupational therapists and doctors was positive, with the tool being relatively easy to use in patients with or without cognitive impairment. Much of the assessment could be incorporated into their initial assessment or in gaining collateral history from next of kin. Anecdotally, considering patients psychological well-being had a positive impact on inpatient therapy sessions guided the MDT in supporting the patient appropriately.

Implementation of a standardised and validated mood screening tool enabled us to identify that a quarter (25%) of the patients admitted following a hip fracture had, or probably had depression. This allowed us to intervene with simple measures such as verbal advice and an information leaflet and consider pharmacological intervention where appropriate.