To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Our understanding of the political and social history of provincial Ireland in the early modern period has been retarded by a conspiracy – more passive than active, more assumed than asserted – between two contrasting and divergent historiographies. The first, the dominant partner in this unintended conspiracy, has been the great master-narrative of Irish history, which, regardless of local variations and accommodations, has given overwhelming prominence to the principal themes of conflict, conquest and confiscation. The second, and less noticed, one has been the work of the local historian, engaged in the more modest pursuits of antiquarian and genealogical research, usually without reference to the assertions of the great national narrative, rarely daring to register a disagreement with it, never overtly challenging it, and often suppressing its own genuine discoveries under the weight of the dominant tradition. The losses arising from this tactful arrangement have been several, perpetuating a misunderstanding of events, of individuals, and of social and cultural practices. But one of its most serious costs has been the disregard of an important alternative framework of analysis which, intervening between the larger level of nation or country and the lower level of locality and the individual, has elsewhere provided a most fertile soil for the growth of a better appreciation of historical change. By this I mean the region.