To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In Patrick Glenn’s The Cosmopolitan State, the reciprocal relationship between ‘elements of closure’ and the ‘cosmopolitan way’ plays a central role. The goal of this chapter is to adopt his perspective on such tensions within statehood, in order to illustrate and concretize their reciprocal relationship in three areas: ‘knowledge’ and its generation and dissemination, ‘sovereignty’, and ‘citizenship’. These areas mirror the elements of closure identified by Glenn, namely, ‘boundaries’, ‘hierarchy’, and ‘writing’. Transposing these elements in such a manner helps to illustrate the sequence of processes that limit a cosmopolitan opening up of states. In all three examples provided, the actual ‘driving forces’ of ‘elements of closure’ are nationalization processes, whether this involves the nationalization of knowledge or the legal notions of sovereignty and citizenship, which function as indispensable requisites for the self-interested life of the nation state. With the processes of progressive economic interdependency, along with the increased mobility as a result of the development of transport and communication technology and transnational migration, these protective walls of national statehood have come under ever-increasing pressure. Ultimately, however, as this chapter will show, it took the idea of human rights as a globally valid legal concept to bring this bastion down.