We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
On 28 July 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. The Serb government declared that the political strategy was not concerned by an event that was internal to Austria-Hungary because the authors of the attack were all Bosniacs and thus Austro-Hungarian subjects. Austria was increasingly weakened by pressures from north and south, and would be incapable of following Germany into a war. The German rulers were convinced that rapid action would prevent the other powers from intervening in the conflict between Serbia and Austria-Hungary. If Russia did not fall in with the wish for localisation and acted militarily in support of Serbia, it would show proof of its war-mongering and pan-Slavist aims. In the end, if a climate of risk of war had developed, it was indeed the army leaders who provoked the outbreak of the war, applying pressure on hesitant or paralysed civilian powers.
This chapter explores the question of whether and in what way French warfare after the defeat at Sedan was regarded as a step on the way to total war. The point is not so much to determine whether the people's war (Volkskrieg) organized by the French leader Leon Gambetta between September 1870 and January 1871 objectively represents a new type of war but, rather, to ask the question of whether and in what way the année terrible (terrible year) and the people s war represented a milestone in German and French memory and military theory between 1871 and 1914. In what way was Gambetta's warfare considered exemplary; how was it adopted in later war theory? Did his contemporaries already consider it a step toward the “war of the future?” The following reflections are a first step onto previously neglected research terrain. There is a dearth of research on the Gambetta myth in the Third Republic, which is somewhat astonishing considering the obvious significance of this politician in French history. Likewise, little is known of how French military history and theory were received in Wilhelmine Germany.
Military science began to explore the people's war of Gambetta's armies soon after the end of the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71. Interestingly, this reflection began much sooner in Germany than in France. Colmar von der Goltz, certainly the most prolific representative of the "official" school of military history in Imperial Germany, published a study in 1877 on Leon Gambetta und seine Armeen (Leon Gambetta and his armies). The study was based on essays by the same author in the Preussischejahrbucher (Prussian yearbooks) of 1874-75.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.