We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To investigate the epidemiology and environmental sources of Fusarium infections in patients with cancer.
Design:
Retrospective case-control study conducted following surveillance environmental cultures and DNA analysis of isolated organisms.
Setting:
A tertiary-care, university cancer center.
Methods:
In 1996 and 1997, environmental cultures were performed on air samples and water systems. A retrospective chart review was performed for 70 patients with cancer identified with fusariosis between 1987 and 1997. Patients with fusariosis were compared with 49 uninfected control patients who occupied hospital rooms with positive environmental cultures for Fusarium. With the use of random amplification of polymorphic DNA organisms isolated from infected patients were compared with environmental organisms.
Results:
Most of the patients with Fusarium (40, 57%) were infected on or within 3 days of admission, indicating community rather than nosocomial acquisition. Patients were comparable in terms of underlying immunocompromised status to 49 uninfected control patients. However, the duration from admission to infection in the patients with fusariosis tended to be shorter than the duration from admission to discharge in the exposed control patients (P = .06). Water cultured from the hospital tanks and from sinks and water fountains was negative for Fusarium. With the use of polymerase chain reaction, environmental isolates did not match clinical ones. Quantitative air sampling showed that the quantitative outdoor Fusarium levels were eightfold higher than the indoor levels. During the rainy summer season, outdoor air concentrations of Fusarium were at their highest, coinciding with the peak incidence of fusariosis at our center.
Conclusion:
The most likely source of fusariosis was the external environment rather than nosocomial sources, such as water.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.