We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The energy in a square membrane Ω subject to constant viscous damping
on a subset $\omega\subset \Omega$ decays exponentially in time
as soon as ω
satisfies a geometrical condition known as the “Bardos-Lebeau-Rauch” condition. The rate
$\tau(\omega)$ of this decay satisfies $\tau(\omega)= 2 \min( -\mu(\omega), g(\omega))$
(see Lebeau [Math.
Phys. Stud.19 (1996) 73–109]). Here $\mu(\omega)$ denotes the spectral abscissa of the
damped wave equation operator and $g(\omega)$ is a number called
the geometrical quantity of ω and defined as follows.
A ray in Ω is the trajectory generated by the
free motion of a mass-point in Ω subject to elastic reflections on the
boundary. These reflections obey the law of geometrical optics.
The geometrical quantity $g(\omega)$ is then defined as the upper limit (large time
asymptotics) of the average trajectory length.
We give here an algorithm to compute explicitly
$g(\omega)$ when ω
is a finite union of squares.
We prove that, contrary to the L1-Nash inequality, there exists a second best constant for the L2-Nash inequality on any smooth compact Riemannian manifold.
We prove that, contrary to the L1-Nash inequality, there exists a second best constant for the L2-Nash inequality on any smooth compact Riemannian manif
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.