To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Decisions made by trustees and third parties (e.g. employers, actuaries, protectors) in relation to trusts are important. The decision-maker will want to get it right and others may look to the courts to review the decision. Generally, such decision-making powers are not ‘absolute’ but are subject to some limited review by the courts (whether or not being exercised by a fiduciary). Although not a trust case, Braganza  UKSC 17 in the UK Supreme Court marks what looks likely to be a definitive shift in favour of applying public law Wednesbury reasonableness (or rationality) standards in both limbs (due consideration and perversity) to review many trust-related decisions. This is despite indications to the contrary in some previous cases, including Pitt v. Holt  UKSC 26. The Braganza tests are in addition to review tests based on scope, proper purposes, honesty and (for fiduciary powers) unauthorised conflicts of interest. This chapter looks at the implications of Braganza and Wednesbury, mainly for trustees, but also of relevance for other decision-makers under a trust, including employers and protectors.
Ice wedges are ubiquitous periglacial features in permafrost terrain. This study investigates the timing of ice wedge formation in the Fosheim Peninsula (Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg Islands). In this region, ice wedge polygons occupy ~50% of the landscape, the majority occurring below the marine limit in the Eureka Sound Lowlands. Numerical simulations suggest that ice wedges may crack to depths of 2.7–3.6 m following a rapid cooling of the ground over mean winter surface temperatures of −18°C to −38°C, corresponding to the depth of ice wedges in the region. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC)/Cl molar ratios suggest that the DOC in the ice wedges is sourced from snowmelt and not from leaching of the active layer. Based on 32 14CDOC measurements from 15 ice wedges, the wedges were likely developing between 9000–2500 cal yr BP. This interval also corresponds to the period of peat accumulation in the region, a proxy of increased moisture. Considering that winter air temperatures remained favorable for ice wedge growth throughout the Holocene, the timing of ice wedge formation reflects changes in snowfall. Overall, this study provides the first reconstruction of ice wedge formation from a high Arctic polar desert environment.
Antarctica's ice shelves modulate the grounded ice flow, and weakening of ice shelves due to climate forcing will decrease their ‘buttressing’ effect, causing a response in the grounded ice. While the processes governing ice-shelf weakening are complex, uncertainties in the response of the grounded ice sheet are also difficult to assess. The Antarctic BUttressing Model Intercomparison Project (ABUMIP) compares ice-sheet model responses to decrease in buttressing by investigating the ‘end-member’ scenario of total and sustained loss of ice shelves. Although unrealistic, this scenario enables gauging the sensitivity of an ensemble of 15 ice-sheet models to a total loss of buttressing, hence exhibiting the full potential of marine ice-sheet instability. All models predict that this scenario leads to multi-metre (1–12 m) sea-level rise over 500 years from present day. West Antarctic ice sheet collapse alone leads to a 1.91–5.08 m sea-level rise due to the marine ice-sheet instability. Mass loss rates are a strong function of the sliding/friction law, with plastic laws cause a further destabilization of the Aurora and Wilkes Subglacial Basins, East Antarctica. Improvements to marine ice-sheet models have greatly reduced variability between modelled ice-sheet responses to extreme ice-shelf loss, e.g. compared to the SeaRISE assessments.
Chapter 9 reviews fold terminology, describes fold profiles at outcrop scales, uses differential geometry to quantify folds in three dimensions at crustal scales, and builds canonical models for folding due to bending and buckling. For two-dimensional profiles of folds in sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous rocks, we introduce the concept of curvature to characterize fold shapes. Then we describe the crustal-scale fold at Sheep Mountain, WY, and use a modern technology called Airborne Laser Swath Mapping (ALSM) to map the fold geometry in three dimensions. We employ differential geometry to characterize a three-dimensional bedding surface in this fold in terms of the principal curvatures at every point. The fundamental shapes at a given point on such a surface can be planar, elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic. These distinct shapes are used to define a classification scheme for folded geological surfaces based on curvature.
Chapter 7 focuses on fractures in rock by describing outcrops of joints, veins, and dikes, introducing a canonical model for opening fractures, and considering fracture initiation and propagation using linear elastic fracture mechanics. The outcrop descriptions serve to highlight the characteristic geometric features of these structures, and provides the background necessary to build a conceptual model for opening fractures in rock. The canonical fracture model is based on a pure opening fracture in an elastic rock mass. With attention focused on the fracture tips, we explore the stress concentration there that leads to fracture propagation, and identify the three modes of fracture tip deformation. We explain how fractures initiate at flaws in rock and propagate when the stress intensity in the near-tip region reaches a critical value called the fracture toughness. Although many opening fractures are approximately planar, we describe how minor amounts of shearing can alter the propagation path and lead to kinked or echelon fractures. These interesting geometries provide evidence for interpreting the state of stress at the time the fractures formed.
Chapter 10 describes rock fabrics at outcrop and thin section scales in sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous rock, introduces the kinematics of ductile deformation, builds a canonical model for a viscous shear zone, and relates fabric development to plastic deformation at fault steps. We revisit the spherical particles called ooliths that were introduced in Section 2.1 and use their alignment in the South Mountain–Blue Ridge Uplift to quantify the deformation that produced a planar fabric called cleavage. Next, we describe outcrops from the Sierra Nevada where shear zones initiated along aplite dikes that localized the strain, and where a fabric developed between the overlapping tips of echelon fault segments. To quantify the kinematics relevant to fabric development, we introduce the concepts of progressive deformation, and the rate of deformation and spin in a shear zone. Then, we develop the canonical model for a viscous shear zone from the equations of motion using the constitutive law for a linear viscous material. Finally, we investigate fabric development at a fault step in granitic rock, and show how a model that includes elastic deformation of the surrounding rock, frictional slip on the fault segments, and plastic deformation of rock within the step matches geometric observations from the outcrop.
Chapter 4 introduces elastic–brittle deformation of rock using field observations of geologic structures, laboratory tests of mechanical behaviors, and theoretical constructs that relate stress to strain. We use solid Earth tides to demonstrate that linear elastic behavior is characteristic of rock deformation in much of Earth’s lithosphere. Then, we use field and laboratory observations to show how elastic deformation of rock culminates in brittle fracture, which sets a limit on rock strength. Brittle deformation occurs as opening fractures and as shearing fractures. Laboratory tests measure the elastic stiffness and strength of rock, and examples show how strength depends on rock type, confining pressure, and pore fluid pressure. To quantify elastic deformation we introduce the stress tensor and small strain tensor. We link the components of these tensors using Hooke’s law for linear elasticity. Then, we show how Newton’s second law, embodied in Cauchy’s equations of motion, is used to model elastic deformation and the development of fractures and faults.
Chapter 5 introduces elastic–ductile deformation of rock using field observations of geologic structures, laboratory tests of mechanical behaviors, and theoretical concepts relevant to strength and ductility. We show that ductile deformation takes over from brittle deformation as confining pressure and temperature increase, and as the rate of deformation decreases, so ductile behavior is characteristic of rock deformation in the deeper levels of Earth’s lithosphere. To quantify ductile deformation, we introduce the idealized elastic–plastic solid, a mathematical construct in which strain is linearly proportional to stress and is recoverable up to the yield point. Thereafter, the stress remains constant while permanent strain accumulates. We review the mechanisms of plastic deformation that involve the motion of dislocations in the crystal lattice. The dependence of plastic deformation on time motivates consideration of flow laws that relate strain rate to the state of stress. We conclude by showing how Newton’s laws, embodied in Cauchy’s equations of motion, model ductile deformation of salt flowing toward a rising diapir.
Tackling structural geology problems today requires a quantitative understanding of the underlying physical principles, and the ability to apply mathematical models to deformation processes within the Earth. Accessible yet rigorous, this unique textbook demonstrates how to approach structural geology quantitatively using calculus and mechanics, and prepares students to interface with professional geophysicists and engineers who appreciate and utilize the same tools and computational methods to solve multidisciplinary problems. Clearly explained methods are used throughout the book to quantify field data, set up mathematical models for the formation of structures, and compare model results to field observations. An extensive online package of coordinated laboratory exercises enables students to consolidate their learning and put it into practice by analyzing structural data and building insightful models. Designed for single-semester undergraduate courses, this pioneering text prepares students for graduates studies and careers as professional geoscientists.
Chapter 1 sets the stage for a quantitative introduction to structural geology. We begin by identifying forces that cause deformation in Earth’s lithosphere and asthenosphere. Then, we describe three different styles of deformation, and five broad classes of geologic structures that result from this deformation. To lay out the methodology for studying geologic structures, we introduce what we mean by a complete mechanics and by canonical models of structural geology. Then we examine the roles of physics and mathematics in studying the origins of geologic structures. Finally, we describe applications of structural geology to problems facing our society and the careers that utilize structural geology to solve those problems.
Chapter 11 begins by defining intrusions, then describes the different characteristic forms of intrusions, and ends by deriving the solution for the rise of a spherical body of viscous liquid in a more dense viscous liquid. This classic solution from fluid dynamics is the canonical model for the intrusion of salt in sedimentary basins. In general, an intrusion is a body of rock that, in a former more mobile state, was injected into and deformed the surrounding host rock. Intrusions take the form of dikes, sills, laccoliths, stocks, plutons, and diapirs. The intruded material could be magma, rising due to buoyancy from deep in Earth’s asthenosphere (Section 1.1.2), or magma injected laterally from a shallow pressurized chamber in Earth’s lithosphere (Section 6.8.2). The intruded material could be salt, moving upward in a diapir due to buoyancy (Section 5.8), or a mobilized slurry of sand injected into the surrounding sedimentary rock (Section 11.1). The intruded material also could be molten rock, formed due to frictional heating on a fault during an earthquake (Section 8.6.3). The diversity of intrusions makes them an interesting and challenging topic for structural geologists.