We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Immersive technologies have the potential to control cognitive and behavioural symptoms in people with dementia. A safe environment can be designed through a specific interactive scenario, according to the preferences and experiences of each user.
Objective:
Mapping neuro-emotional responses during the interactive scenario therapy experience in a case study, with dementia, using electroencephalography (EEG).
Methods:
A participant, 78 years old and diagnosed with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (female; Mini Mental State Examination score of 17 points; frontal assessment battery score of 8 points), underwent EEG analysis (EMOTIV EPOC X) using a protocol with interactive scenarios tailored to the participant's needs and preferences, the scenarios were designed from reminiscence strategies. The protocol included a stimulus that alternated between motor and cognitive activities (3 minutes), and breath-centered relaxation (1 minute). The scenarios used in this study were: setting up a living room; composing a cake recipe; shopping in the market to make a cake; looking for objects in the park; organizing a birthday party. These variables are provided, on a scale of 0 to 100, after processing by the algorithms of the EmotivPRO v3.0 software.
Results:
The values found in the EEG analysis will be described without stimulus and with stimulus respectively. Thus, engagement (68.57 to 71.86); arousal (57.86 to 49.86), focus (61.57 to 57.00), interest (54.86 to 49.57), relaxation (33.86 to 30.86), and stress (53.71 to 43.00). The EEG data showed an increase in engagement when the patient was stimulated (68.57 to 71.86). Relaxation also increased (30.86 to 33.86) when the stimulus was removed. The stress level, as analysed by the EEG, was also higher in the period without stimulus and reduced in the period with the stimulus (53.71 to 43).
Conclusion:
During a stimulus period in interactive therapy, there was an increase in engagement, which was related to an increasing focus during the stimulus. Lower values were observed compared to the period without stimulus, indicating a period of recovery after a period of concentration/arousal. Therefore, therapy with an interactive and familiar scenario, using a circuit of stimulus-breathing exercises, promotes a positive and adequate neuro-emotional response in a person with dementia.
The use of music in older people with advanced dementia is possible because perception, sensitivity, emotion, and memory of music may remain intact after other types of memory disappear. Previous literature is controversial about stress biomarkers response to music introduction in therapy routines for people with severe cognitive impairment and neural-behavioural disorders. Particularly, for these patients, it is possible that they feel lower pleasure levels with music-based therapies.
Objective:
To characterize the immediate physiological effects of listening to music during psychomotor stimulation in an old participant with combined dementia and depression disorder and in a participant with a dementia diagnosis.
Methods:
Two study cases with dementia diagnosis participated in this study (P1: 84yrs; male Parkinson; FAB=9; P2: 85 yrs; female; Alzheimer; FAB=11; depression diagnosis) and were submitted to psychomotor stimulation (2 sessions). The first 20 min. of each session was dedicated to psychomotor stimulation without music (A), followed by 20 minutes with music (B). Heart rate was monitored (H10 Polar sensor) in a continuous mode. Cortisol levels were collected at the beginning of the session (T0) and then repeated at periods A and B (μg/dL). The range between minimum and maximum HR values (beats per minute- bpm) and mean values for cortisol levels were considered for the stress response analysis.
Results:
Salivary cortisol levels were higher at T0 for P1 (0.393 vs 0.203). During period A, the P1 slightly decreased their values (↓0,076) and P2 had no changes. After introducing music, both P1 and P2 increased cortisol levels (↑0,085; 0,162↑). For both P1 and P2, a wide range of HR was detected during period B (P1: 13 vs 23 bpm) vs (P2: 15 vs 41 bpm).
Conclusion:
Immediate responses to the music inclusion in a psychomotor intervention caused an augmented stress response in elderly participants with dementia, especially in P2. In specific, the depression diagnosis in this participant may be associated with a low capacity to handle emotions during new experiences, causing a higher stress response.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.