We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We present the true stages machinery and illustrate its applications to descriptive set theory. We use this machinery to provide new proofs of the Hausdorff–Kuratowski and Wadge theorems on the structure of $\mathbf {\Delta }^0_\xi $, Louveau and Saint Raymond’s separation theorem, and Louveau’s separation theorem.
We introduce several highness notions on degrees related to the problem of computing isomorphisms between structures, provided that isomorphisms exist. We consider variants along axes of uniformity, inclusion of negative information, and several other problems related to computing isomorphisms. These other problems include Scott analysis (in the form of back-and-forth relations), jump hierarchies, and computing descending sequences in linear orders.
We define the Scott complexity of a countable structure to be the least complexity of a Scott sentence for that structure. This is a finer notion of complexity than Scott rank: it distinguishes between whether the simplest Scott sentence is
$\Sigma _{\alpha }$
,
$\Pi _{\alpha }$
, or
$\mathrm {d-}\Sigma _{\alpha }$
. We give a complete classification of the possible Scott complexities, including an example of a structure whose simplest Scott sentence is
$\Sigma _{\lambda + 1}$
for
$\lambda $
a limit ordinal. This answers a question left open by A. Miller.
We also construct examples of computable structures of high Scott rank with Scott complexities
$\Sigma _{\omega _1^{CK}+1}$
and
$\mathrm {d-}\Sigma _{\omega _1^{CK}+1}$
. There are three other possible Scott complexities for a computable structure of high Scott rank:
$\Pi _{\omega _1^{CK}}$
,
$\Pi _{\omega _1^{CK}+1}$
,
$\Sigma _{\omega _1^{CK}+1}$
. Examples of these were already known. Our examples are computable structures of Scott rank
$\omega _1^{CK}+1$
which, after naming finitely many constants, have Scott rank
$\omega _1^{CK}$
. The existence of such structures was an open question.
A problem is a multivalued function from a set of instances to a set of solutions. We consider only instances and solutions coded by sets of integers. A problem admits preservation of some computability-theoretic weakness property if every computable instance of the problem admits a solution relative to which the property holds. For example, cone avoidance is the ability, given a noncomputable set A and a computable instance of a problem
${\mathsf {P}}$
, to find a solution relative to which A is still noncomputable.
In this article, we compare relativized versions of computability-theoretic notions of preservation which have been studied in reverse mathematics, and prove that the ones which were not already separated by natural statements in the literature actually coincide. In particular, we prove that it is equivalent to admit avoidance of one cone, of
$\omega $
cones, of one hyperimmunity or of one non-
$\Sigma ^{0}_1$
definition. We also prove that the hierarchies of preservation of hyperimmunity and non-
$\Sigma ^{0}_1$
definitions coincide. On the other hand, none of these notions coincide in a nonrelativized setting.
We review the current knowledge concerning strong jump-traceability. We cover the known results relating strong jump-traceability to randomness, and those relating it to degree theory. We also discuss the techniques used in working with strongly jump-traceable sets. We end with a section of open questions.
We show that a Δ02 Turing degree computes solutions to all computable instances of the finite intersection principle if and only if it computes a 1-generic degree. We also investigate finite and infinite variants of the principle.
We show the existence of noncomputable oracles which are low for Demuth randomness, answering a question in [15] (also Problem 5.5.19 in [34]). We fully characterize lowness for Demuth randomness using an appropriate notion of traceability. Central to this characterization is a partial relativization of Demuth randomness, which may be more natural than the fully relativized version. We also show that an oracle is low for weak Demuth randomness if and only if it is computable.