We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter argues that printer-publisher Richard Jones’s experiments with scene divisions in his octavo of Tamburlaine the Great (1590) reflect an effort to accentuate the episodic dramaturgy of the plays in textual form. Contemporary comments about both parts of Tamburlaine in performance accord with modern critical impressions that these plays read as a “sequence,” “series,” “succession,” “procession,” and “progression” of discrete units. By putting the divisions in the context of the earlier typographic patterns for dividing plays, it suggests that Jones purposefully deployed and revised the placement of divisions to articulate one of the plays’ defining qualities onstage—its success in compressing Tamburlaine’s expansive military campaign into the limited time and space of performance and thereby furnishing audiences with a cumulative impression of his life.