We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Arden of Faversham is one of the few anonymous dramas which even today enjoy a great deal of popularity both among readers and on stage. It is perhaps the best-known ‘domestic tragedy’ and is based on an actual murder committed in 1551. The play was written between 1588 and 1591 and printed in 1592 as a quarto edition. As was also the case with Shakespeare’s history plays, Macbeth, parts of King Lear and Cymbeline, Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland (1577; rev. 1578) was the play’s most important historical source; and this essay will focus primarily on the ways in which this material was used, as well as the play’s ongoing reception. The essay begins with an overview of the actual historical events behind the play’s action, before sketching out its genesis as a drama of intensively debated authorship. Following this, it argues that even in spite of its moralising framework, Arden opened English drama up to a new range of subject matters by considerably narrowing the gap between lofty subjects deemed worthy of a stylised poetic treatment, on the one hand, and the humble fare traditionally more suited to comedy, on the other. It is this innovative combination which may (at least in part) explain its enduring popularity. The essay’s concluding sections consider the complex relationship between the tragedy and its source, arguing that Arden reflects gradual societal and moral shifts around the question of marriage in particular.