The Dutch corporate law framework of the public company (the NV) is characterized by an ‘institutional’ approach including a board autonomy principle and the focus on long-term value creation, which is well-established in Dutch (case) law. The Dutch shareholder meeting shares its important position with the corporate board and is not the highest power in the company. Despite that this Dutch framework follows a clear stakeholder model, shareholders have important decision-making rights that are defined in the law. These statutory decision-making rights include topics like (amongst others) say-on-pay, director (re-)elections, capital resolutions, discharging directors, and amendments to the articles of association. Further decision-making rights can be defined in the articles of association, albeit these articles can also limit shareholder voice via oligarchic provisions. Institutional investors systemically own the majority of the shares in the largest listed companies in the Netherlands, which explains the large and increasing focus on institutional stewardship.

The chapter lays a roadmap for the Handbook on Shareholder Engagement and Voting. It defines shareholder engagement as shareholders’ involvement with their investee companies, using their shareholder rights and powers, both formal and informal (such as voting rights), to influence corporate affairs inside and outside general meetings of shareholders. The chapter further discusses the Handbook’s overall methodological considerations, that is, a sophisticated functionalist approach, with a combined use of doctrinal and empirical methods. The chapter proceeds to elaborate on the framework of research questions that guide the Handbook’s chapter contributions on 19 jurisdictions around the globe. The framework comprises three groups of questions: general jurisdictional features, legal means of shareholder voting and engagement, as well as shareholder voting and engagement in practice. The chapter concludes with a brief outline of the Handbook’s structure.

This chapter provides an overview of the main findings of the 19 jurisdictions that are studied in the Handbook on Shareholder Engagement and Voting. The chapter describes the different legal means available for shareholders to engage with their companies, and outlines both the procedural requirements for general meetings and the material shareholder rights in a comparative perspective. Partly due to global capital markets and the rise of institutional ownership, this chapter shows important similarities in shareholder control rights and convergence between jurisdictions. An important example of such convergence are say-on-pay rights: in virtually all jurisdictions, shareholders have some sort of say-on-pay to date. Yet, this chapter also shows that important differences remain, also marked by the large variety of advisory and binding say-on-pay rights. Clearly, the although the legal infrastructure is a very important factor for the practice of shareholder rights, domestic factors often play a major role, even in today’s globalized markets.