Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 5 - The Nature of Custom: Legal Science and Comparative Legal History in Blackstone’s Commentaries
  • Edited by William Eves, University of St Andrews, Scotland, John Hudson, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ingrid Ivarsen, University of Cambridge, Sarah B. White, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law
  • Published online: 01 April 2021
  • Print publication: 15 April 2021, pp 140-160
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
  • View extract

    Summary

    Throughout the Commentaries, Blackstone repeatedly availed himself of comparative legal history. Comparison allowed him to detect the invariable principles of legal experience and organise his systematic exposition of English law around them. This method proved crucial in Blackstone’s treatment of custom, as it allowed him to present the chief source of English common law by addressing the main questions concerning the nature of custom that had been raised earlier by Western jurisprudence. The paper will explore the depth of Blackstone’s engagement with such traditions. In doing so, it will investigate whether custom was understood differently on the two sides of the Channel.