We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Philip Czech, University of Salzburg,Lisa Heschl, University of Graz,Karin Lukas, Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte, Austria,Manfred Nowak, University of Vienna,Gerd Oberleitner, European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, University of Graz
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to the fore the many inequalities encountered by persons with disabilities in all spheres of life. In institutional settings, the pandemic has not only resulted in increased risks of isolation and exploitation, but it has also caused a disproportionate number of deaths among inhabitants of residential institutions and group homes. This has underlined the increased urgency to promote the transition from institutional care to community living globally and at the European Union (EU, the Union) level. Following the conclusion by the EU, in 2010, of the 2006 United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) – which has since been ratified by all EU Member States – the Union adopted several legal and policy instruments promoting the transition away from institutional care. Those instruments sought to ensure compliance with Article 19 CRPD (on living independently and being included in the community). Arguably the most prominent example of the EU's commitment to deinstitutionalisation is embodied in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF, or Funds) 2014–2020, which have very recently been replaced by new measures for the programming period 2021–2027. However, concerns about the use of the ESIF have been raised by the Council of Europe's Human Rights Commissioner and the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, among others. UN Special Rapporteurs have also drawn attention to the fact that the European Commission has authorised national projects whereby the ESIF have been used to continue practices of institutionalisation and segregation. Furthermore, the European Ombudsman has invited the European Commission to address the lack of an appropriate legal basis to ensure that the spending of EU Funds complies with the CRPD. The COVID-19 crisis has not only highlighted the structural challenges pertaining to institutional and social care systems in the EU, but it has also exacerbated the difficulty in monitoring the use of EU Funds, particularly in emergency situations. Against this background, this contribution critically analyses the response of the EU institutions to the pandemic, including the two key Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives (CRII and CRII +), and the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030.
Chapter 11 traces the development of EU legislation concerning non-discrimination on the grounds of disability. The chapter examines the key concepts of ‘direct discrimination’, ‘indirect discrimination’, the ‘burden of proof’ and ‘causation’. The chapter provides an overview of the key legislative enactment regulating disability discrimination within the EU, the Employment Equality Directive. In addition, it examines the case law of the CJEU relating to disability discrimination pre- and post-CRPD. The chapter highlights that, under the influence of the CRPD, the CJEU’s case law demonstrates a shift from the medical model to the social model of disability. Finally, the chapter reflects on the Commission’s proposal for a new non-discrimination directive.
In this first textbook on international and European disability law and policy, Broderick and Ferri analyse the interaction between different legal systems and sources. Guided by the global legal standards of the CRPD, students are equipped with the necessary background on disability, and are given a comprehensive overview of the legal and policy frameworks on disability. The narrative maintains the balance between theory and practice, focusing on the legal framework and challenges in the realm of policy-making, and ensuring that students are aware of current legal debates and controversial issues in the field. Accommodating different learning styles, the book employs a range of accessible features which include learning outcomes for each chapter, problem questions, group activities, extracts from legal debates and more. Including case studies and examples from around the world, this book has a truly global perspective, suitable for introductory and advanced modules in law departments, as well as interdisciplinary courses.
Chapter 9 addresses selected substantive CRPD rights together, namely, the right to education, the right to access culture and the right to participate in political and public life. In the first instance, the chapter contains an overview of the development of the right to inclusive education and the meaning of the concept. It then outlines the goals of inclusive education and the measures to be adopted by States Parties under Article 24 CRPD. It addresses the key challenges encountered in the implementation of Article 24 CRPD as well as best practices in the field. In the second instance, the chapter turns to an examination of the right to access culture and the obligations stemming from that right. In analysing the scope and content of Article 30 CRPD, the chapter also addresses the protection and promotion of sign languages and Deaf culture. Finally, the chapter sets out the right to political participation, which is an essential component in achieving active citizenship, and it examines the normative content of Article 29 CRPD.
Chapter 12 examines the main tenets of the current EU action on accessibility for persons with disabilities and identify the most relevant provisions in the EU legal framework. It analyses the relevant accessibility legislation that predates the conclusion of the CRPD as well as more recent regulations and directives in the domains of the physical environment, transportation, information and communications. It also briefly discusses accessibility of cultural goods and services, including audiovisual services. Then, the chapter turns to an examination of the proposal for a European Accessibility Act, which is currently under discussion in the EU legislative institutions. Additionally, the chapter examines accessibility requirements in public procurement legislation, and succinctly addresses the role of standardisation in guaranteeing accessibility. Finally, it goes on to discuss the role of state aid law and policy in fostering accessibility and in promoting the rights of persons with disabilities.
Chapter 4 analyses Article 5 CRPD, as a key norm to ensuring the exercise and enjoyment by persons with disabilities of all human rights without any discrimination. It also provides an analysis of the relevant constituent elements of Article 2 CRPD, which contains important definitions, for the purpose of applying Article 5 CRPD. It discusses in detail the duty to reasonably accommodate persons with disabilities, and it analyses the principle of equality in connection with positive action. The chapter examines the prohibition of multiple and intersectional discrimination, contained in Article 6 CRPD, and the rights of children with disabilities, as provided for in Article 7 CRPD. Finally, the chapter analyses from a theoretical and comparative perspective, the model of equality contained in the CRPD.
This chapter introduces the reader to the textbook and to the novelties and intricacies inherent to international and European disability law and policy. In that regard, the chapter begins with an overview of the developments that led to the emergence of disability law as an academic discipline. Thereafter, the chapter briefly discusses how the language of disability has changed over time. It then goes on to provide an account of the aims and objectives of this textbook, and it outlines the guiding perspective and the methodological approach adopted in the book. Finally, the chapter ends with an outline of the structure of the textbook as a whole.
Chapter 7 reflects on the scope of the right to access justice in the CRPD, taking into account the jurisprudence of the CRPD Committee. Firstly, it examines the right to access justice in international human rights law, before turning its attention to the barriers that people with disabilities face when they interact with the justice system on the whole. Then, the chapter discusses the scope and normative content of Article 13 CRPD and examines the role that other CRPD provisions play in ensuring equal access to the judicial system and protection from inhuman treatment in the event of a conviction. The chapter finally addresses the challenges associated with the participation of people with disabilities, either as victims or offenders, in the criminal justice system.
Chapter 5 reflects on how accessibility is understood in the CRPD and how it is interpreted by the CRPD Committee. It conducts a broad examination of the multidimensional concept of ‘accessibility’ and its relationship with universal design and assistive devices. It discusses the role of ‘accessibility rights’ in the Convention and focuses on the content and scope of Article 9, addressing the relationship between accessibility and non-discrimination. The chapter investigates the differences between accessibility and reasonable accommodation, in light of the CRPD Committee’s jurisprudence. Finally, the chapter briefly analyses Article 21 CRPD on access to information and communications.
Chapter 3 examines the negotiation process that lead to the adoption of the CRPD and provides a general overview of the innovative features of the Convention. It critically discusses the structure and core substantive rights of the CRPD, as well as its general obligations and general principles. In addition to analysing the role played by data collection and international cooperation in advancing disability rights, the chapter examines the role of the CRPD Committee in protecting and promoting the rights of persons with disabilities and in enhancing compliance with the CRPD globally. The chapter also explores the national monitoring and implementation system provided for in the Convention, including the role of the focal point and coordination mechanism. Finally, the role of bodies such as the UN Human Rights Council, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in advancing the implementation of the CRPD are briefly discussed.