Life engagement represents a holistic concept that encompasses outcomes reflecting life-fulfilment, well-being and participation in valued and meaningful activities, which is recently gaining attention and scientific interest. Despite its conceptual importance and its relevance, life engagement represents a largely unexplored domain in schizophrenia. The aims of the present study were to independently assess correlates and predictors of patient life engagement in a large and well-characterized sample of schizophrenia patients.

To assess the impact of different demographic, clinical, cognitive and functional parameters on life engagement in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia, data from the social cognition psychometric evaluation project were analyzed.

Overall schizophrenia and depressive symptom severity, premorbid IQ, neurocognitive performance, social cognition performance both in the emotion processing and theory of mind domains, functional capacity, social skills performance and real-world functioning in different areas all emerged as correlates of patient life engagement. Greater symptom severity and greater impairment in real-world interpersonal relationships, social skills, functional capacity and work outcomes emerged as individual predictors of greater limitations in life engagement.

Life engagement in people living with schizophrenia represents a holistic and complex construct, with several different clinical, cognitive and functional correlates. These features represent potential treatment targets to improve the clinical condition and also facilitate the process of recovery and the overall well-being of people living with schizophrenia.

Depressive symptoms are a common feature of schizophrenia (SCH) and define bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD). Their emergence is related to altered neurotransmission at the serotonin receptors and potentially at dopamine D3 receptors.

The aim of this analysis was to examine the efficacy of cariprazine (CAR) in treating depressive symptoms in SCH, bipolar depression (BD) and MDD.

Clinical trials with randomised, double-blind, placebo (PLB)-controlled designs were included in these analyses. Data from 3 SCH [NCT00694707, NCT01104766, NCT01104779; 1.5-9 mg/d] and 3 BD [NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551; 1.5-3 mg/d] studies were pooled. In MDD, add-on CAR to antidepressant treatment was evaluated against PLB in two studies [NCT03738215: 1.5 and 3 mg/d; NCT01469377: 1-2 mg/d and 2-4.5 mg/d).

Least square (LS) mean changes were analysed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures: from baseline (BL) to Week 6 in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-derived Marder anxiety/depression factor items (schizophrenia); from BL to Week 6 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores (bipolar depression); and from BL to Week 6 [NCT03738215] and Week 8 [NCT01469377] in MADRS total score (major depressive disorder).

Altogether, 1466 SCH (PLB=442, CAR=1024) patients were included in the pooled analysis. In the BD analysis, data from 1383 (PLB=460, CAR=923) patients were pooled. In the MDD trials, there were 502 CAR (1.5mg/d=250, 3 mg/d=252) and 249 PLB-treated patients [NCT03738215], and 544 CAR (1-2 mg/d=273, 2-4.5 mg/d=271) and 264 PLB patients in the other study [NCT01469377]. In SCH, CAR achieved significantly greater reductions than PLB on the Marder anxiety/depression factor domain (LS mean change: PLB= -2.66, CAR= -3.26, p<0.01): the effect was driven by 3 out of 4 items. In BD, CAR yielded significantly greater improvement on the MADRS compared to PLB (LS mean change: PLB= -12.05, CAR= -14.69, p<0.001), which was driven by 9 out of 10 items. In MDD [NCT03738215], CAR 1.5 mg/d add-on significantly alleviated depressive symptoms compared to PLB (LS mean change: PLB= -11.5, CAR 1.5mg/d= -14.1, p<0.01), while in the other MDD trial [NCT01469377], CAR 2-4.5 mg/d add-on produced significantly greater reductions than PLB (LS mean change: PLB= -12.5, CAR 2-4.5 mg/d= -14.6, p<0.01).

These findings indicate that CAR is an effective treatment option for the treatment of depressive symptoms independent of disease (in SCH, BD and MDD), being a transdiagnostic broad-spectrum treatment option.

R. McIntyre Grant / Research support from: CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the Milken Institute, Consultant of: Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals, Viatris, Abbvie, Gedeon Richter, Recordati, Atai Life Sciences, Speakers bureau of: Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals, Viatris, Abbvie, Gedeon Richter, Recordati, Atai Life Sciences, R. Csehi Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc., G. Németh Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc.

Background: The number of suicide-related presentations to emergency departments (EDs) has significantly increased over recent years; thus, making staff often the first point of contact for people in suicidal crisis. Despite this, staff receive minimal psychiatric training and few opportunities for education on the treatment and management of people presenting in suicidal emergencies. Understanding the needs of those who work within EDs is key to maximising the opportunity to reduce suicidal behaviour. Aims: To examine staff perspectives and experiences of working with people presenting to emergency departments in suicidal crisis.

Qualitative study guided by thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with ED administrative, medical and mental health staff.

Twenty-three staff participated. Three key themes were identified: (1) factors influencing staff decision-making; (2) quality of care for both staff and patients; (3) staff burnout, mental health and well-being. Staff described an overall lack of confidence and training related to asking patients about suicidal thoughts, which resulted in defensive practice and risk adverse decision-making. Quality of care for both patients and staff were discussed in relation to availability of resources, staffing pressures and team collegiality.

Staff felt inadequately equipped to deal with suicide-related presentations. Organisational support is lacking with increased staffing pressures, poor service availability and lack of beds. Negative staff attitudes often reflected an inherent unintentional use of language. Changing ED culture from top-down is imperative to address negative language and behaviours towards suicidal crisis and improve patient pathways and experience. Mandatory and ongoing training is needed to improve staff confidence, knowledge and attitudes.

The recording of suicidal ideation in emergency departments (EDs) is inconsistent and lacks precision, which can impede appropriate referral and follow-up. EDs are often the first point of contact for people experiencing suicide-related distress, but while data are available on attendances for self-harm, no comparable data exist for suicidal crisis.

Data were collected from six EDs across Cheshire and Merseyside (N = 42,096). Data were derived from presenting complaints, chief complaints and diagnosis codes for all suicidal crisis attendances (suicidal ideation, self-harm, suicide attempt) from January 2019 to December 2021.

There was inconsistent coding within and between ED sites for people presenting in suicidal crisis. Attendances for suicidal ideation were often given the chief complaint code of ‘depressive disorder’ (12%). There was a high level of missing data related to the coding of suicide-related presentations (65%). Variation in coding was also reported for individual presentations; for example, 12% of attendances reported to be due to ‘self-inflicted injury’ were given a primary diagnosis code of ‘depressive disorder’ rather than ‘deliberate self-harm’. There was also high variability in the routinely collected data (e.g., demographic information, attendance source and mode, under the influence at time of arrival) both within and between EDs.

Accurate detection and documentation of suicidal crisis is critical to understand future risk and improve services. Research and development in monitoring systems for suicidal crisis should be a priority for health services, and a national data collection tool is urgently needed to maximise accuracy and utility. Better data could be used to inform crisis care policy and to target suicide-prevention resources more effectively.

Vortioxetine has demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), with the greatest effect observed with vortioxetine 20 mg/day. This analysis further explored the clinical relevance of the more rapid and greater improvement in depressive symptoms observed with vortioxetine 20 mg/day vs 10 mg/day.

Analysis of pooled data from six short-term (8-week), randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose studies of vortioxetine 20 mg/day in patients with MDD (N = 2620). Symptomatic response (≥50% decrease in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score), sustained symptomatic response, and remission (MADRS total score ≤10) were assessed by vortioxetine dosage (20 or 10 mg/day).

After 8 weeks, 51.4% of patients receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day had achieved symptomatic response vs 46.0% of those receiving vortioxetine 10 mg/day (P < .05). Significantly more patients achieved symptomatic response vs placebo from week 2 onwards for vortioxetine 20 mg/day and from week 6 onwards for vortioxetine 10 mg/day (both P ≤ .05). Sustained response was achieved from week 4 for 26.0% of patients receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day vs 19.1% of those receiving vortioxetine 10 mg/day (P < .01), increasing to 36.0% and 29.8%, respectively, over the 8-week treatment period (P < .05). At week 8, 32.0% of patients receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day were in remission vs 28.2% of those receiving vortioxetine 10 mg/day (P = .09). Rates of adverse events and treatment withdrawal were not increased during the week following vortioxetine dose up-titration to 20 mg/day.

Vortioxetine 20 mg/day provides more rapid and more sustained symptomatic response than vortioxetine 10 mg/day in patients with MDD, without compromising tolerability.

In patients with bipolar disorder, depression symptoms are associated with greater reduction in function and quality of life than hypomania/mania symptoms. Lumateperone (LUMA), is an FDA-approved antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder.

In a recent phase 3 clinical trial (Study 404, NCT03249376) in people with bipolar depression, LUMA 42 mg monotherapy significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with placebo (PBO). This analysis of Study 404 investigated the effects of LUMA on functional disability and quality of life as measured using the secondary outcome measure, the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF).

Patients (18–75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score ≥20 and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity [CGI-BP-S] score ≥4) were randomized to LUMA 42 mg or PBO orally, once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Day 43 in MADRS Total score, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) approach in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). This post hoc analysis evaluated the mean change from baseline to Day 43 in the Q-LES-Q-SF individual item scores using an analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward (ANCOVA-LOCF) in the ITT. Categorical shifts in individual items were also analyzed.

The ITT comprised 376 patients (LUMA 42 mg, 188; PBO, 188). Patients in the LUMA 42 mg group had significantly greater improvement on MADRS Total score change from baseline to Day 43 compared with PBO (least squares mean difference vs PBO [LSMD], −4.585; 95% CI, −6.344 to −2.826; effect size vs PBO [ES], −0.56; P<.0001). LUMA 42 mg treatment significantly improved Q-LES-Q-SF Total score from baseline to Day 43 compared with PBO (LSMD, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.59; P=.001).

The Q-LES-Q-SF items with the lowest mean scores at baseline in both groups were mood, leisure time activities, and sexual drive, interest, and/or performance. By Day 43, LUMA 42 mg treatment significantly improved 8 of the 14 items in the Q-LES-Q-SF (P<0.05). Overall life satisfaction also significantly improved with LUMA treatment (P=.0016). The largest improvements with LUMA 42 mg compared with PBO (ES>0.3,) were seen for the ability to function in daily life, family relationships, household activities, leisure time activities, and mood (all LSMD=0.3; all P<.01).

In patients with bipolar depression, treatment with LUMA 42 mg compared with PBO significantly improved patient quality of life and functional impairment. These results support LUMA 42 mg as treatment of MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder in adults.

Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.

Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a new long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulation for gluteal administration every 2 months. This 32-week trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of multiple-dose administration of Ari 2MRTU 960 in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or BP-I, versus that of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400; an LAI indicated for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in adult patients stabilized with oral aripiprazole and maintenance monotherapy treatment of BP-I [indication varies by country]). Safety and efficacy outcomes in the subpopulation of patients with BP-I are reported here.

Patients with BP-I were randomized to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 every 56±2 days or AOM 400 every 28±2 days. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (scale range: 0–100) for patient-reported injection site pain, and extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) monitoring. Efficacy was assessed at Week 32 by Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I), Clinical Global Impression – Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment – Short Form (SWN-S), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

Study completion rate was 72.5% (29/40 patients) in the Ari 2MRTU 960 group and 70.7% (29/41 patients) in the AOM 400 group. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment groups. Treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) incidence was 82.5% with Ari 2MRTU 960 and 87.8% with AOM 400. The most frequent TEAEs were increased weight (Ari 2MRTU 960, 25.0%; AOM 400, 26.8%) and injection site pain (Ari 2MRTU 960, 25.0%; AOM 400, 7.3%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) VAS score for pain after last injection was 1.2 (2.07) with Ari 2MRTU 960 and 1.3 (2.19) with AOM 400. Minimal change was seen in EPS in either group. At Week 32, mean (SD) CGI-I score was 3.1 [1.2] with Ari 2MRTU 960 and 3.2 [1.5] with AOM 400, and there was minimal mean (SD) change from baseline in CGI-BP score (Ari 2MRTU 960, -0.2 [1.0]; AOM 400, -0.6 [1.2]). Mean (SD) change from baseline in SWN-S Total score was 10.3 (16.1) with Ari 2MRTU 960 and 3.4 (21.4) with AOM 400. There was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups in MADRS Total score or YMRS Total score (difference of least squares mean change from baseline [95% confidence interval]: MADRS Total score -2.1 [-6.3, 2.1], p=0.3185; YMRS Total score 0.1 [-1.8, 2.1], p=0.8995).

In patients with BP-I, Ari 2MRTU 960 was generally well tolerated, and clinical stability was maintained during the study.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (Princeton, NJ, USA) and H. Lundbeck A/S (Valby, Denmark).

Treatments for MDD that can improve both overall depressive and anhedonic symptoms are urgently needed.

AXS-05 (dextromethorphan-bupropion) is a novel, oral, investigational NMDA receptor antagonist with multimodal activity being developed for MDD. The dextromethorphan component of AXS-05 is an NMDA receptor antagonist and a sigma-1 receptor agonist. The bupropion component of AXS-05 serves primarily to increase the bioavailability of dextromethorphan.

To evaluate the effect of AXS-05 in improving anhedonic symptoms in MDD.

GEMINI (N=327) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week study, which randomized adults with MDD to AXS-05 (dextromethorphan HBr 45 mg- bupropion HCl 105 mg) or placebo, twice daily. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the MADRS total score at Week 6. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to determine the impact of AXS-05 versus placebo on the 5-item MADRS anhedonia subscale (MAS).

Baseline MAS scores were 19.8 and 19.6 in the AXS-05 and placebo group, respectively. At Week 1, AXS-05 treatment resulted in a significant mean reduction from baseline in the MAS score of 4.44 versus 2.69 points for placebo (p< 0.001). At Week 6, the mean reduction from baseline in the MAS was 9.70 for AXS-05 compared to 7.22 for placebo (p=0.001). Response rates (≥ 50% MAS improvement) were significantly greater for AXS-05 compared to placebo at Week 1 (p< 0.001) and at every time point thereafter.

Treatment with AXS-05 was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events being dizziness, nausea, headache, diarrhea, somnolence, and dry mouth.

Treatment with AXS-05 rapidly and significantly reduced anhedonic symptoms as well as overall depressive symptoms.

Axsome Therapeutics

To examine and compare rates and methods of self-harm presenting to a tertiary referral hospital during an 18-month period since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with a similar period immediately prior to the pandemic onset.

Data from an anonymized database compared rates of self-harm presentations and methods employed between 1st March 2020 and 31st August 2021 to a similar time-frame prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

A 9.1% increase in presentations with self-harm was noted since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Periods of more stringent restrictions were associated with higher levels of self-harm (daily rate of 2.10 v 0.77). A higher lethality of attempt was demonstrated post-COVID-19 onset (χ2 = 15.38, p < 0.001). Fewer individuals presenting with self-harm were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 84, 11.1%, v. n = 112, 16.2%, χ2 = 7.898, p = 0.005), with no other differences pertaining to psychiatric diagnosis noted. More patients actively engaged with mental health services (MHS) presented with self-harm (n = 239 (31.7%) v. n = 137, (19.8%), χ2 = 40.798, p ≤ 0.001) since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite an initial reduction, an increase in rates of self-harm has occurred since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with higher rates evident during periods of higher government mandated restrictions. An increase in active patients of MHS presenting with self-harm potentially relates to reduced availability of supports and particularly group activities. The recommencement of group therapeutic interventions for individuals attending MHS in particular is warranted.